Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NPR's Ken Rudin Predicts Democrats Will Take Control of House of Representatives
NPR ^ | October 26, 2006 | Ken Rudin

Posted on 10/27/2006 1:06:25 PM PDT by StJacques

Oct. 26, 2006  With the midterm elections less than two weeks away, the Republican Party faces the real possibility of forfeiting its grip on the House of Representatives for the first time since 1994. As the chart above shows, at last count, the forecast from NPR Political Editor Ken Rudin sees Democrats ahead in 211 races, Republicans ahead in 204 races, and 20 races as tossups.

At last count, NPR's numbers suggest there are 60 key races that could swing control of the House. . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006; congress; election; house; wishfulthinking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Here's the graphic from the page:



Sadly; the numbers RealClearPolitics.com presents, race by race, seem to support Rudin's conclusion, though their overall outlook is not quite as grim.

It looks like I'm going to be buying a lot of Rolaids in the near future. Election night will almost certainly turn my stomach if these numbers hold up.
1 posted on 10/27/2006 1:06:28 PM PDT by StJacques
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StJacques

And I predict I will be given $10 million dollars tomorrow morning.

There, all of us can have fun. What a great game.


2 posted on 10/27/2006 1:08:15 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StJacques
NPR's Ken Rudin Predicts Democrats Will Take Control of House of Representatives

This is an example of the Democrat based "educational faith-based" propagandizing.

3 posted on 10/27/2006 1:08:51 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

The NPR political editor is not a source that I would turn to for a straight-up assessment


4 posted on 10/27/2006 1:10:24 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

That's why he is at NPR and not some high paying prognostication job.


5 posted on 10/27/2006 1:10:37 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

NPR, that bastion of truth? WE'RE DOOMED!


6 posted on 10/27/2006 1:10:42 PM PDT by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

More like WISHING, than predicting.


7 posted on 10/27/2006 1:10:49 PM PDT by mutley ("I read the Koran, and didn't find anything of value in it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alia

Exactly. I wonder if anyone from NPR has EVER predicted a Republican victory?


8 posted on 10/27/2006 1:13:18 PM PDT by The Blitherer (You were given the choice between war & dishonor. You chose dishonor & you will have war. -Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mutley

The numbers at RealClearPolitics.com -- see the link in my "Comments" post -- suggest the Democrats are very likely to get a gain of 16 or 17 seats. And those guys are not shivvin' for the Dems.


9 posted on 10/27/2006 1:14:32 PM PDT by StJacques (Liberty is always unfinished business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

Michael Barone and National Review are looking at a 16-17 RAT pick in the House.


But, we can still make those predictions false. The House is all about GOTV. I compare our chances of holding the House to a football team trying to kick a 50 yard field goal.


10 posted on 10/27/2006 1:15:23 PM PDT by Kuksool (Design your Own Polls. Go Vote and Take a Few Others With You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I will be given $10 million dollars tomorrow morning.

I'll split it with you.

11 posted on 10/27/2006 1:16:19 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

Rocko predicts Ken Rudin will be proven wrong.


12 posted on 10/27/2006 1:17:13 PM PDT by Rocko ("Ned Lamont doesn't know anything. You might as well vote for Michael Bolton." -- O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

No, but they are basing their bets on dim controlled polling!

LLS


13 posted on 10/27/2006 1:18:02 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: StJacques
This is NPR and Real Clear politics ain't that much better.

Remember the polls of Obragore in Mexico winning by a landslide?

14 posted on 10/27/2006 1:18:36 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

"suggest the Democrats are very likely to get a gain of 16 or 17 seats. And those guys are not shivvin' for the Dems."

That may be so, but I won't believe it till I see it happen. The American people aren't that stupid...at least, not enough of them.


15 posted on 10/27/2006 1:20:39 PM PDT by mutley ("I read the Koran, and didn't find anything of value in it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

Trust the Perdogg, the GOP will retain control.


16 posted on 10/27/2006 1:20:59 PM PDT by Perdogg (Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

NPR IS the voice of the DNC. Don't believe ANYTHING they say.

NPR is why AA could not find a liberal audience.


17 posted on 10/27/2006 1:21:44 PM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

The fact that we still pay for NPR is one of the reasons the Republicans are having difficulties. I hope we are rewarded on election day with a Republican majority in Congress that finally cuts all government funding for NPR and PBS.


18 posted on 10/27/2006 1:21:46 PM PDT by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mutley
That may be so, but I won't believe it till I see it happen. The American people aren't that stupid...at least, not enough of them.

You can fool all of the people some of the time, and you can fool some of the people all of the time, but you can often fool enough of the people enough of the time to control Congress.

I'll remain cautiously optimistic, and agitate for everyone I know to get out and vote.
19 posted on 10/27/2006 1:23:52 PM PDT by WardMClark (Semi-Notorious Political Gadfly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: StJacques

One hopes in the near future, that NPR, that socialist wing of the left, will no longer be funded by hard working tax-payers.


20 posted on 10/27/2006 1:24:22 PM PDT by KenmcG414
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson