Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Durham) Prosecutor (Nifong) Yet to Interview Rape Accuser
Associated Press ^ | October 27, 2006 | Aaron Beard

Posted on 10/27/2006 12:36:17 PM PDT by Arec Barrwin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: madison10

This case has been a disgusting sham from the beginning. Nifong needs to pay for this some day.


21 posted on 10/27/2006 12:56:21 PM PDT by mutley ("I read the Koran, and didn't find anything of value in it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

The current governor of North Carolina is a Democrat, and that party is still dominant at the state level. That should say a lot.


22 posted on 10/27/2006 12:56:23 PM PDT by johnpannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

This must utterly astound every lawyer who reads it, as it astounds me. Basic practice requires any lawyer who's going into an adversarial proceeding to interview and prepare his primary witness, especially if that individual is a complaining witness. Without doing it the lawyer simply doesn't know whether he has a case or not. A prosecutor is ethically required at least to have a good faith belief that he can prove a case against a defendant beyond a reasonable doubt before he moves to indict that defendant. The complaining witness's testimony is the lynch pin of any rape case with a living complainant and no circumstantial evidence, like a positive DNA test. Interviewing that person is essential for the prosecutor to know if there is a minimally prosecutable case. Nifong has just admitted to blatant prosecutorial malpractice and abuse. He should be disbarred and sued for violating the defendants' Federally guaranteed civil rights by attempting illegally to deprive them of their liberty under color of law.


23 posted on 10/27/2006 12:56:24 PM PDT by libstripper (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Nifong could represent himself, but if I were in his spot, I would want a competent attorney...


24 posted on 10/27/2006 12:57:07 PM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Arec Barrwin
Nifong...
...you will be charged with malicious prosecution.

Hmmmmm... I see an ancient and revered legal principle at work here:
FISH OR CUT BAIT!
aka... PAINT OR GET OFF THE LADDER!

I think serving the county with a federal complaint for the violation of the alleged defendants' constitutional rights might move things right along.... up to an including dismissal...

This guy is a disgraced political hack.... C ya

26 posted on 10/27/2006 12:58:13 PM PDT by Wings-n-Wind (All of the answers remain available; Wisdom is gained by asking the right questions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I hope Nifongs's life is a legal and financial nightmare for years because of this.


27 posted on 10/27/2006 12:58:45 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

This is BS, he interviewed her, he's just stonewalling.


28 posted on 10/27/2006 12:59:15 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin

Just when I thought I could not be more astounded by this case!


29 posted on 10/27/2006 12:59:25 PM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
He should also be made to re-embursh the legal fees of these students.

I agree. Actually, I think if the state brings a case against citizen and the citizen is found innocent, I think the state should be required to reimburse attorney's fees. It's a loser pays system like we needin civil law.

However, there is one point I have to disagree on, and it probably rubs most conservatives the wrong way, but the taxpayers of Durham should be made to pay those attorney's fees. Ultimately, the taxpayers are responsible for the actions of those they choose to represent them.

As for personal consequences, I'd like to see Nifong lose his election and get disbarred. By all rights he should be charged with Prosecutorial misconduct, but those charges almost never stick.

He should at least get disbarred. That way when I drive up I can tell him that I really don't want fries with that.
30 posted on 10/27/2006 1:00:17 PM PDT by JamesP81 (Rights must be enforced; rights that you're not allowed to enforce are rights that you don't have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CowPalace1964
Check out some of the child abuse witch-hunts of the 80s/90s. Absolutely chilling.

I can believe it. Someone somewhere either wanted to keep a job, write a master's thesis, or get revenge. There is no recourse once a person is labeled unjustly.

31 posted on 10/27/2006 1:00:21 PM PDT by madison10 (Live your life in such a way that the preacher won't have to lie at your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: meandog
"There really ought to be an effort by the courts of N.C. to remove Nifong from this case and disbar him from further practice!"

It would take and act of malfeasance and trust fund embezzlement that affected prominent democrats before a disbarment and prosecution would happen.
32 posted on 10/27/2006 1:00:50 PM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dreagon
A speedy trial is not Nigong's goal, getting re-elected is. He's stalling until after the November 7 election.

-PJ

33 posted on 10/27/2006 1:01:03 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Arec Barrwin
"I haven't talked with her about the facts of that night. ... We're not at that stage yet." - Nifong

The whole case is a bunch of Barbara Striesand !

34 posted on 10/27/2006 1:01:07 PM PDT by patriot_wes (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem - may they prosper who love thee...Ps 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

If I were one of these boy's father, I'd have put that POS in the hospital by now.


35 posted on 10/27/2006 1:03:03 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: babaloo

It sure seems that way


36 posted on 10/27/2006 1:03:28 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

I don't disagree with that at all. He represents taxpayers and if taxpayers have to pay for legal bills so be it for bringing a bogus charge..

Nifong should be jailed.


37 posted on 10/27/2006 1:04:00 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: madison10
There is no recourse once a person is labeled unjustly.

Indeed. It's a severe problem these days.

If there's ever a rebellion in this country, it will be something like this that gets it touched off.
38 posted on 10/27/2006 1:05:42 PM PDT by JamesP81 (Rights must be enforced; rights that you're not allowed to enforce are rights that you don't have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

"He's stalling until after the November 7 election."

He's stalling because he has NO CASE. This travesty will never come to trial.

-TW


39 posted on 10/27/2006 1:06:09 PM PDT by teawithmisswilliams (Question Diversity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

Maybe you're right, we'll see, but surely you expect that the accused & their families will be hitting him with civil lawsuits, don't you? I still think he's setting up a defense of incompetence for himself.


40 posted on 10/27/2006 1:07:15 PM PDT by leilani (Dimmi, dimmi se mai fu fatta cosa alcuna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson