Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Graphic Sexual Content in Webb's Novels Questioned
WTOP ^ | 10/27/07

Posted on 10/27/2006 5:44:03 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 next last
To: Elyse
I asked if you weren't sure you weren't a Democrat because this seems to be one of their favorite comebacks for anything concerning a person's opinion on the war that they don't agree with - have you volunteered or have you sent your children? Sorry, I got snide, it just hit a nerve.

I'm a former Naval officer, the son of a Naval officer and Vietnam War veteran, the grandson and nephew of many World War II veterans, and the brother of a Naval officer currently in harm's way. I have not been to war, and wouldn't be so pretentious to speak for any of my relatives who have been to war just because they are related to me. I'm sure combat affected each of them in a different and very personal manner, and that each of them drew their own conclusions about man's humanity during war. Good enough for you?

161 posted on 10/27/2006 8:32:45 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
So 'THAT' isn't sex either? Sounds like Webb and Bill Clinton have a LOT in common!!

Webb missed his calling--I SEE INTERN MATERIAL HERE!!

162 posted on 10/27/2006 8:34:03 AM PDT by stockstrader (“Where government advances–and it advances RELENTLESSLY-freedom is imperiled”-Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #163 Removed by Moderator

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Course not...it would only make a difference if a republican candidate had written this crap....double standard in the media??? You bet!


164 posted on 10/27/2006 8:34:07 AM PDT by auto power
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

"artificial standard"

I see nothing artificial about the standards. They seem to be a reasoned estimate of what the public wants to see on television. Moreover, I don't think you can claim that broadcast TV's depictions of incest or other social tragedies are less effective than the kind of thing that Webb wrote in his books. I'd say, in fact, they were more effective.

Regarding the "cycle of retail politics," I suspect it's more a function of lying than of brutal facts, which is how I view the release of this Webb material.

Webb may not be Burroughs, but his graphic language and imgages puts him as close to Burroughs as he is to, say, Joseph Conrad or Barbara Kingsolver.


165 posted on 10/27/2006 8:35:31 AM PDT by zook (America going insane - "Do you read Sutter Caine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

I have to say, I don't think this is such a big deal. Granted, Webb's descriptions of lurid acts and mysogyny are written with language that is a little too loving for my taste, but it is fiction and done for that purpose.

To me, this is a media story. Webb's work should have been discussed in the media, but they didn't. That's the story here. Let nobody call this an October Surprise because none of this is new.


166 posted on 10/27/2006 8:42:10 AM PDT by AmishDude (Mwahahahahahahahaha -- official evil laugh of the North American Union)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

Yes, and I'm sorry I've offended you because that really wasn't my intention. We will have to agree to disagree because I think there is enough evidence out there from personal accounts to draw a valid conclusion.


167 posted on 10/27/2006 8:53:05 AM PDT by Elyse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Elyse
Yes, and I'm sorry I've offended you because that really wasn't my intention. We will have to agree to disagree because I think there is enough evidence out there from personal accounts to draw a valid conclusion.

No offense taken; no harm, no foul. I understand how passionate people are about this issue, and their desire to defeat Webb. I just think there are other, better ways to do it, that's all---i.e., the strength of ideas vice the "politics of personal destruction" (ugh, what a term).

168 posted on 10/27/2006 8:56:40 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Very reasonable, my friend.


169 posted on 10/27/2006 8:57:17 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Begala was on earlier and spinning this as just novel writing.

Although not in the realm of politics, weren't people saying the exact opposite of Mark Fuhrman during the OJ trial? Didn't Fuhrman say that he was giving background to a writer when he used the "F-word" and the OJ defense used that to discredit everything about Fuhrman?

-PJ

170 posted on 10/27/2006 9:05:13 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hoodlum91
If it was actually released as a statement from the campaign, it makes them look incredibly desperate.

...but not serious.

171 posted on 10/27/2006 9:12:14 AM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Er, you do understand the concept that Foley's behavior is what is technically known as "fact", and how this differs from what is technically known as "fiction", right?


172 posted on 10/27/2006 9:13:19 AM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Miklaszewski is still p.o.'d because Rummy ripped his tonsils out yesterday.


173 posted on 10/27/2006 9:20:00 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Er, you do understand the concept that Foley's behavior is what is technically known as "fact", and how this differs from what is technically known as "fiction", right?

Let's try this again. We are dealing with facts in both instances. Foley is clearly a deranged pervert because of his approaches to young men. Webb obviously has some strange things rattling around his belfry to write such fiction. Surely the voters of Virginia should be informed of what's knocking around inside Webb's mind? Or would you prefer that this was swept under the carpet?

Ivan

174 posted on 10/27/2006 9:24:35 AM PDT by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
I'm sorry, but this really reeks of desperation from his opponent.

Also, it has considerable potential to backfire, given the facts that 1)much of Webb's writings relate to his experiences in Vietnam and 2)Allen's Vietnam experience is limited to deciding whether to order the Banh Hoi or the Mien Ga.

175 posted on 10/27/2006 9:26:48 AM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Hoo Wee. Guy must be having "Foley asms"!


176 posted on 10/27/2006 9:30:18 AM PDT by dforest (tired of the BS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Elyse
I haven't read the book, but the only thing I can possibly come up with is that Webb was trying to stress the point that people surrounded by war become numb to even the most abhorrent sights among them.

As I noted in my previous message, Allen is in trouble if the issue mutates in that direction....

177 posted on 10/27/2006 9:30:50 AM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Captain Jack Aubrey

Maybe I am "misremembering" but I think Mark Furhman was discredited and maligned because of the things he discussed about a novel he was writing or proposing to write. It seemed very important to folks at that time. Anybody remember this more clearly?


178 posted on 10/27/2006 9:34:35 AM PDT by Anima Mundi (Not LAND but LAW that is missing in Latin America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
Dunno 'bout little boys, but I wouldn't trust Newt with a teenage girl...

Well, let's just say that I would probably discourage any daughter of mine from working in the former Speaker's offices.

Of course Newt isn't actively running for office and Webb is.

And there hangs the tale (or is that 'tail'?).
179 posted on 10/27/2006 10:28:51 AM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Alia

Webb has reportedly said that one of his books IS being taught in college English classes.


180 posted on 10/27/2006 10:48:46 AM PDT by Carolinamom ("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson