Posted on 10/26/2006 7:18:40 PM PDT by kristinn
Nightline contacted me Tuesday looking to interview Jim about a story they were working on about the Dixie Chicks. Jim declined as is his wont and he said I could do it if I felt like it. I informed ABC of Jim's decision. They did a pre-interview with me by phone Tuesday afternoon. Yesterday they called back and scheduled the inteview for late this afternoon. They asked if I had an office they could film the interview at. I laughed and said, no, so we set it up for the ABC News D.C. bureau on DeSales St.
This morning, they asked if they could move the interview up to mid-day. I said sure and arrived at the bureau promptly at 2:30, accompanied by Nofel al Jazairi, an Iraqi friend who has spoken at many of the D.C. Chapter's support the troops and their mission rallies over the past four years. Nofel and I had a meeting on Capitol Hill planned for this afternoon.
We were met downstairs by a waiting Nightline producer who took us upstairs to the Nightline offices. She offered us coffee and tea, which we glady accepted. Another woman brought us to the studio where the interview would be conducted. However, it wasn't exactly a studio. It was the office of Nightline co-anchor Terry Moran. I guess they were intent on not using a sterile set for the interview.
They applied no make-up to me, but they did have me wipe my forehead to ease some of the shine reflecting off my ever receding hairline.
I introduced Nofel to the producer who would be doing the interview off-camera. She said she had been to Iraq at the beginning of the war. We spoke about Iraq for a few minutes before we got down to business. Nofel sat on a couch off-camera while I sat on a chair in front of Moran's desk.
The producer told me she didn't really know that much about the blogosphere and would be interested in meeting later to learn more about it ( When she said that, I thought back to Mary Mapes' crash course on the Internet the day after Rathergate broke.) I told her she should, because we were driving her profession out of business. I didn't mean that in a snarky way, but it's a fact that even ABC's political director Mark Halperin has been sounding the alarm about.
The interview went on for what seemed liked thirty miinutes, but it was probably shorter. It was a decent interview, question wise. One thing that threw me for a bit of a loop was when she read back a quote by one of the Dixie Chicks from the interview they did for the show this morning. The gist of it was they were blaming Free Republic for creating an atmosphere of hate that led to death threats. I answered by saying, "Don't lay that at our door" and spoke about the death threats that conservatives get on a regular basis and about the new Bush assassination film and the similarly themed books and plays, and Air America host who called for Bush's assassination. I asked where's the outrage for that.
I also said that if Natalie Maines had made her remark in Iraq about Saddam Hussein at that time, that she would have been kidnapped, raped, tortured, mutilated and her body dumped ina canal or buried in the desert and that her family would never hear about her again.
The producer began the interview by asking about Free Republic. I gave the usual answer, "It's a conservative news, analysis and activism forum..."
We got in to the London incident and what role Free Republic played in the downfall of the Dixie Chicks. We spoke about the film and certain scenes in it. She wanted to know how we felt about our 'victory' over the Dixie Chicks. I tried to put it in context with other efforts that received less acknowledgement, like Freepers helping to get President Clinton impeached and later instigating a boycott of Morgan Stanley for having Clinton speak at a meeting shortly after Clinton left the White House in disgrace. I was reluctant to claim complete responsibility for the 'victory' as it was more than the reaction of Freepers that laid the Dixie Chicks low. Freepers played a visible and effective role, but we weren't the only ones outraged by the Dixie Chicks back then.
There were more questions and discussions, but I don't have a detailed recollection because.....a few minutes after the interview ended the producer came over to me with some bad news. The audio recording was blemished by static. She asked if I could do the interview over. I said sure. Nofel, who has a background in broadcasting, told me he had a feeling there was a problem with the sound, but he didn't say anything as he assumed the professionals had it under control.
The sound engineer explained later that the piece of equipment he was using is twenty years old and is designed so you can only moniter the sound from the mic to the recorder and not the output.
We had planned to go outside and film a shot of me walking about a tiny park. It's a much used, but much denigrated in the business technique for B-Roll that can be used with a voiceover by the reporter. Thankfully, that went out the window with the botched first interview. Nofel went outside any way after having witnessed the magic of network television firsthand. Once was enough.
Terry Moran was not put out by his office being tied up for a while longer. We ended up speaking for about five minutes while they reset the camera and lights. Despite how surly he came off when he was dealing with Scott McClellan, we had a decent conversation about the the foundering mainstream news business. He was flabbergasted when I told him Katie Couric was down to a 1.1. in Los Angeles.
The second interview was shorter. I got the feeling, having been an interviewer myself, that the producer had a more precise idea of what would work for the segment after having gone through the first round.
Some of the questions were the same, like the Dixie Chicks accusing FR of inciting hatred, and some were different. I was a bit fatigued for the second try. The producer had to remind me a few times to look up when I was speaking because I was lowering my eyes while I was thinking back to how I responded the first time the question was asked.
After it was over, she said told me that she thought this round was better than the first. "The first one was good," she said, "but the second was great!"
I laughed and said, "You say that to all the interviewees."
She said she meant it but I had my doubts because I felt like I needed an espresso after the two go-rounds.
The sound engineer agreed with the producer, saying, "You had some great (sound) bites in this one."
All I can say is, we'll all be able to find out later tonight. 11:30 eastern, 10:30 Central and after your late local news in the Mountain and Western time zones.
"Note to self: If ever giving an interview use a pocket recorder."
This is so, so, so important. You should have every right to have, at a minimum, an audio recording of the interview for your own records to be able to prove what was or wasn't said, how the interview was cut up, to counter any false impressions from creative editing.
The fact that ABC was purportedly using a 20 year old piece of equipment, didn't place you in a studio and then stated they "missed" the first take just sets off a BS alarm. It may be a standard tactic to say the first go around was flubbed so that when the same questions are asked the second time around one doesn't come across as genuine because one tends to be rewinding to remember how the more spontaneous response to the first round was framed. Then again for some this would not be an issue and one could very well be able to be more succinct.
PS: Did ABC risk losing the a first go around by using 20 year old equipment when it interviewed "The Chicks"?
Our technical glitch was totally unrelated to the Dixie Chicks or the news coverage. It was purely technical and on our end. Thankfully, John was able to isolate and fix the problem within minutes. There was no denial of service attack and no black helicopters (they were white with blue UN markings).
What did you expect from Terry????
In fact, in the film, the Chicks are shown a photo of the suspected threatener, and Natalie Maines said that he was "kinda cute." I'm not making that up.
Thank goodness for 'evolving' technology...lol.
Check it out:
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/
I was thinking the same thing...
That it is all well and good that he walks around in a floppy hat, and no armor...but, that wasn't exactly Baghdad that he was walking in....
I bet the troops that cleaned it up to the point that he COULD dress like that, wore helmets....(those meanies).
I'm no fan of Nightwhine but I think they and these other shows always tape their interviews at least a few days in advance, unlike the late-night comedy shows, which I think are taped the same night they are shown.
Thank you CedarDave for clarifying. :)
LOL. That is scary. The white ones are the worst. You can't see them in the daylight. I was sweating bullets for a few minutes there boss.
"PS: Did ABC risk losing the a first go around by using 20 year old equipment when it interviewed "The Chicks"? "
Bump
Technical difficulties are probably reserved for Republicans.
DU'ers attacking the FR server flew through my mind.
;-)
I'm still amazed that the "progressive" (i.e leftwing) think-tank treated you so well last week. The questions were fair and they seemed to want to be educated, even though it would unlikely change anyones mind. You did a tremendous job and got along well with the particpants. Getting out of the lion's den without a scratch is quite an accomplishment.
Will check back in tomorrow night to watch the ABC show.
I not working this Saturday so I could stay up LOL!
I expect the worst, but hope for fair and balance.
Yours was a very interesting post. Well said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.