Posted on 10/26/2006 9:08:52 AM PDT by Kaslin
You ask, in your recent "60 Minutes" commentary, for the president to finally flat-out "explain" why we have troops in Iraq. While busy preparing your commentaries, you perhaps failed to hear the president explain this -- over and over and over again.
Allow me to try.
-- The world changed for many -- apparently not you -- after 9/11.
-- Saddam Hussein violated numerous United Nations resolutions following the first Persian Gulf War. Saddam's military continuously shot at U.S. and British planes patrolling the Northern and Southern No-Fly Zones. He offered $25,000 to families of homicide bombers. We know he possessed chemical and biological weapons because he used them during the Iraq/Iran war, and on his own people, the Kurds.
-- The October '02 National Intelligence Estimate concluded with "high confidence" -- the highest certainty allowed -- that Saddam possessed stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons. All 16 intelligence agencies contributing to the NIE unanimously agreed on the chemical and biological weapons assumptions, with disagreement only on how far along Saddam was toward acquiring nukes.
-- Weapons inspectors found no WMD stockpiles, leading many Americans to feel that the president either lied or cherry-picked intelligence to lead us into war. But the Robb-Silverman Commission concluded that the president didn't lie. The bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee's 511-page report concluded that the president did not lie. The British Butler Commission, which examined whether Prime Minister Tony Blair "sexed up" the intelligence to make a case for war, concluded the PM didn't lie.
-- Kenneth Pollack, an opponent of the Iraq war, served as Iraq expert and intelligence analyst in the Clinton administration. Pollack writes that during his 1999-2001 tour on the National Security Council, " . . . the intelligence community convinced me and the rest of the Clinton Administration that Saddam had reconstituted his WMD programs following the withdrawal of the UN inspectors, in 1998, and was only a matter of years away from having a nuclear weapon. . . . The U.S. intelligence community's belief that Saddam was aggressively pursuing weapons of mass destruction pre-dated Bush's inauguration, and therefore cannot be attributed to political pressure. . . . Other nations' intelligence services were similarly aligned with U.S. views. . . . Germany . . . Israel, Russia, Britain, China, and even France held positions similar to that of the United States. . . . In sum, (SET ITAL) no one (END ITAL) doubted that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction."
-- Meanwhile, neighboring Iran defiantly pursues nuclear weapons. Bush reasoned that a free, democratic and prosperous Iraq would destabilize Iran, accomplishing regime change without military force. This would encourage the rest of the Arab world to direct their grievances toward their own leaders, rather than against the "infidels."
-- We remain in Iraq because, as former Secretary of State James Baker put it, "[I]f we picked up and left right now . . . you would see the biggest civil war you've ever seen. Every neighboring country would be involved in there, doing its own thing, Turkey, Iran, Syria, you name it, and even our friends in the Gulf."
-- Former Secretary of State and informal Bush adviser Henry Kissinger -- who knows something about the consequences of cutting and running -- wrote, "Victory over the insurgency is the only meaningful exit strategy."
-- The political aim of our Islamofascist enemies is a worldwide Caliphate, or Islamic world. Renowned Islam expert Bernard Lewis recently reiterated his support for the war: "The response to 9/11 came as a nasty surprise [to bin Laden and his followers]. They were expecting more of the same -- bleating and apologies -- instead of which they got a vigorous reaction, first in Afghanistan and then in Iraq. And as they used to say in Moscow: It is no accident, comrades, that there has been no successful attack in the United States since then. . . . [T]he effort is difficult and the outcome uncertain, but I think the effort must be made. Either we bring them freedom, or they destroy us."
True, 2,800 of our best have died. Any figure above zero is a tragedy. But America -- on both sides of the Civil War -- lost more than 600,000 soldiers, or 2 percent of the country's population of 31 million. Of our country's 132 million, we lost more than 400,000 in World War II, or .3 percent of our population. In the Korean War, we lost 37,000, and the Vietnam War saw 58,000 dead.
Many people say that after failing to find stockpiles of WMD, Bush "switched" rationale for the war. Consider this excerpt from a New York Times editorial about a speech Bush gave weeks before the coalition entered Iraq:
"President Bush sketched an expansive vision last night of what he expects to accomplish by a war in Iraq. Instead of focusing on eliminating weapons of mass destruction, or reducing the threat of terror to the United States, Mr. Bush talked about establishing a 'free and peaceful Iraq' that would serve as a 'dramatic and inspiring example' to the entire Arab and Muslim world, provide a stabilizing influence in the Middle East and even help end the Arab-Israeli conflict."
Still confused? Please write back, and I'll try again.
Sincerely yours, Larry Elder
Larry Elder is an accomplished attorney, radio personality, syndicated columnist, host of daytime television's The Larry Elder Show, and author of Showdown : Confronting Bias, Lies, and the Special Interests That Divide America .
Larry is one of the good guys.
This is a keeper
Love his SIRIUS radio program.
Bravo for Larry Elder.
It's time for Andy to put his teeth back in, trim his eyebrows, take his meds and fade into the sunset.
There is too much truth, and far too many facts, in this letter by Larry Elder for the ideologically destitute like Andy Rooney, Jon Stewart, CNN, WAPO, everyone at the NYT...Nancy Pelosi...etc....
"following the first Persian Gulf War"
This is the only thing I disagree with here. Correct me if I'm wrong. There is no first or second Gulf war. It's the continuation of the sa,e war, cause there was never a peace treaty signed, there was an armistice or a ceasefire. Saddam violated the conditions of the ceasefire, so the war never stopped. This campaign could be referred two as Phase 2 or the Gulf war.
Andy Looney is of my generation and has been a looney leftist all of his life.....which is a long time.
These leftists have used the WMD issue all along to cloud the real reason of why the war in Iraq is being waged. Just their way to undermine the president and defeat their own country...in the name of regaining their power.
When your voter base is stoned out kids or welfare bums you have to break issues down into "either/or."
Look out! Facts! Quick, Lefties, plug your ears and chant the Big Lie, "No WMDs, no terrorist links, quagmire."
The Sage of South Central rocks!
If that's the case, then it isn't even a war at all under any formal definition. The U.S. never declared war against Iraq -- either in 2003 or in 1990.
I would also like to know what qualifies Mr. Rooney, or any other person who is not actually doing any fighting for our country, to be taken seriously. It has constantly amazed me that a plethora of unqualified people have concluded this, that, and the other because it sounds good to some.
And it is also good to know how very much these people seem to care not for the Iraqi people, that have been slaughtered by a ruthless dictator, for that appears to be quite irrelevant...
And what did we get in return for a cease fire and 37,000 lost lives? (Not exactly "cut and run", but close enough.) The world's biggest nutjob was allowed to pursue nuclear missiles.
Damn right he is a great spokesman for the truth..
Rooney is a egomaniac who is still in the spotlight
because he spouts the CBS bash Bush line..He is an
old codger (like me) who acts and looks like he hates
anything and everything....He would be long gone
from any credible organization....Jake
Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.