New Jersey Court Backs Full Rights for Gay Couples

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/26/nyregion/26marriage.html?hp&ex=1161921600&en=179e1fdb5c46876e&ei=5094&partner=homepage ^

[zippy the razor]

TRENTON, Oct. 25 — New Jersey’s highest court ruled on Wednesday that gay couples are entitled to the same legal rights and financial benefits as heterosexual couples, but ordered the Legislature to decide whether their unions must be called marriage or could be known by another name.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

Since when does a court "order" legislation like a fast food drive through?

[HiTech RedNeck]

Since the legislature lays down for it that's when. So far no state faced with a situation like that has told its court to stuff it.

[Farmer Dean]

The homo-friendly judges that were appointed by gay boy Jim carried the day for the fag agenda.

[no dems]

Where does little Tommy Jr. stand on this issue?

[traditional1]

What has been done is to now determine legal rights based on a person's sexual behavior, as opposed to his conduct in a natural, moral, traditional lifestyle. We have relegaed sexual deviance to be a qualification for benefits normally intended to promote family units and societal benefit.

On this basis, you cannot discriminate against the deviance of ANY preference, then, meaning a NAMBLA proponent, a bestiality freak, etc. can use this logic to gain benefits for him and his sheep or goat, etc.

Where do we end the entitlements?

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

So far no state faced with a situation like that has told its court to stuff it.

I think if they pulled that in Texas, the legislature wouldn't have to say or do anything and the gallows would be built in minutes...

[HiTech RedNeck]

By the time a guvner has nominated enough of these vermin and the legislature ratified them, the state is certified as being backbone-free anyhow.

[musikman]

And now on to people who want to live together just so they can get insurance benefits, etc.

Whatever !!! That's the word to describe the philosophy of our day --- WHATEVER !!!

[SR 50]

I was thinking the same thing yesterday when I heard this on the news. If the law doesn't allow this for everyone (even those just living together) then the law would be discriminating against them.

[Wilhelm Tell]

One thing I haven't heard much discussion about is how gay "marriage" will cause the price of health insurance to skyrocket. Imagine if a gay person decides to sign up an uninsured friend as a "partner" -- and this friend has AIDS. The homosexual lobby has two goals -- make the idea of marriage meaningless and have a scheme that helps uninsured homosexuals get health insurance.

When the health care system finally collapses, the leftists will introduce socialized medicine. The system will offer lavish support for people with AIDS but most people with other chronic, expensive diseases will be offered euthanasia as the only "treatment."

[JimRed]

So now, any two (and eventually, "or more") individuals sharing living quarters can benefit from percs formerly provided to families? OK, then be sure that they are taxed with the "marriage penalty", just to make it fair.