If I had a pound for every tabloid story about what Charles is 'said to believe', each one contradicting the last, I'd be pretty rich. I thought Freepers were supposed to be healthily sceptical about uncorroborated stories in the newspapers?
I thought Freepers were supposed to be healthily sceptical about uncorroborated stories in the newspapers?
Only one article would be deemed unbelievable, absolutely, but over the years there have been a lot of different newspaper and magazine coverages which are written largely without cross-referencing each other, a TV series, and a lot of antedotal evidences from the Prince of Wales's own engagements as well. The probability stacks up to much more than just a mere speculations.