Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shifting Alliances in the Salafi Movement After the Lebanon War
The Jamestown Foundation ^ | October 19, 2006 | Abdul Hameed Bakier

Posted on 10/25/2006 7:42:25 PM PDT by neverdem

NVM: Modules
 

 
Volume 4, Issue 20 (October 19, 2006) | Download PDF Version



Shifting Alliances in the Salafi Movement After the Lebanon War

By Abdul Hameed Bakier The recent war in Lebanon could become a significant factor leading to a transformation within the Salafi movement in the Arab world. The conflict may also have a similar impact on Salafis as did the Gulf War of 1991. Transformations within the Salafi movement tend to create divisions and cause new splinter groups to form. When the new splinter groups emerge, they generally are more radical in nature and closer to Salafi-Jihadi extremist ideology. This article explores the early fractures in Salafi ideology, examines the controversial arguments among Salafis in the wake of the war in Lebanon, and attempts to understand how the recent war in Lebanon may affect the Salafi movement as a result of the increasing sectarian conflict in the Arab world and the acute divisions over the perspectives of Shiite Hezbollah.

Origins of Modern Salafi Factions

On the eve of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1991 and the eruption of the Gulf War, the Arab-Islamic world witnessed severe internal divisions. The presence of U.S. troops in the region was a source of internal disagreements in the Salafi movement about the justification of the U.S. presence on the Arabian Peninsula. As a result of these disagreements, the Salafi movement splintered into two factions: the "traditional faction" and what can be labeled as the "center-wing faction." A third faction—the Salafi-Jihadis—was formulating in Afghanistan at the time and would remain concentrated in Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network.

The traditional Salafi faction expressed Saudi Arabia's and the Gulf States' approved government perspective of Islam and justified the presence of foreign forces in the region, particularly on the Arabia Peninsula.

The second faction, however, formed what became the first modern Salafi political opposition. This new Salafi orientation can be labeled as the center-wing faction or the al-Sorour faction, an attribution to Syrian Sheikh Mohammad bin Sorour Zinalabdeen. Sheikh Salman al-Odeh and Sheikh Safar al-Hawali were the two prominent clergymen of the center-wing faction and were considered unique in the history of Salafi movements because they politicized the movement to a degree that had not been seen previously. This Salafi faction was opposed to the U.S. military's presence in the region and against other political issues in Arabia such as government corruption and the mounting influence of the liberal movement in the Arab world.

The influence of the center-wing spread across the Arab world and the lectures of the "two sheikhs of resurgence," al-Odeh and al-Hawali, circulated throughout the Muslim community. Some of these lectures included, "Why They Fear Islam" by al-Odeh, and "Kissinger's Promise" by al-Hawali. The Salafi movement, even though not fully mature, emerged as a popular political movement. The imprisonment of both al-Odeh and al-Hawali from 1994 to 1999 by Saudi authorities made them symbols of that movement.

After the events of September 11, the center-wing and the Salafi-Jihadi factions witnessed deep discord, especially when the two sheikhs were released from prison. These divisions occurred because after the two sheikhs were released, they were less radicalized and less willing to irritate the Saudi government. They became especially conservative on the use of violence. The disagreements between both factions exacerbated over time. These differences were manifested when a prominent Salafi-Jihadi, Yousef al-Ayyiri, released an article criticizing Saudi religious reformists by calling them weak and accusing them of begging the West to spare the Muslim world [1]. In a message to Sheikh Safar al-Hawali, in response to al-Hawali's declaration to the umma entitled "Message to Bush" released in November 2002, al-Ayyiri commenced by describing al-Hawali's declaration as "a scholar's slip of tongue that should not dishonor him"; nevertheless, he criticized al-Hawali for not having a clear position regarding the mujahideen, governments that do not apply Sharia and Western culture. Al-Ayyiri insinuated that al-Hawali was using the mujahideen to pressure the government without participating in jihad himself [2].

The deep dissidence between the center-wing and the Salafi-Jihadis was further manifested in another message by al-Ayyiri to representatives calling for Islamic reforms on the eve of the inauguration of al-Hawali's "Global Campaign for Aggression Resistance" [3]. Al-Ayyiri rejected the campaign and accused al-Hawali of becoming a pro-government intellectual and of removing the duty of jihad from Islam [4]. Further, he says that al-Hawali does not support jihad, citing an interview that the latter gave to al-Majd Islamic television declaring his disapproval of jihad in Afghanistan and calling upon the Taliban to hand over Osama bin Laden to stop the bloodshed there [5]. Al-Ayyiri also criticized al-Odeh for altering his previous perspectives that were more in-line with center-wing and Salafi-Jihadi ideology. This was a significant development in the Salafi movement because al-Ayyiri was once a major supporter of al-Odeh and al-Hawali.

In the Salafi-Jihadi publication Sawt al-Jihad, a writer by the name of Mohammad bin Salem wrote an article that said fatwas issued by some Saudi religious scholars prohibiting suicide bombings were gifts for Jews [6]. He criticized al-Odeh for forbidding the mujahideen to travel to Afghanistan to fight U.S. forces. The writer accused Safar al-Hawali of turning Ali al-Faq'asi al-Ghamidi into the authorities; al-Ghamidi was on the Saudi most wanted list of 19 terrorists issued in 2003. Al-Ghamidi, however, surrendered to the authorities himself and is still in prison.

From the aforementioned, we notice the state of antipathy and escalation that culminated between the two factions that started from admonitions, arguments, ideological queries, acquiescence and ending with accusations that center-wing Salafis were collaborating with the state.

The Impact of the Lebanon War

To understand the impact of the Lebanon war on the Salafi movement, there are three developments to be considered. First, the traditional Salafis that represented the state's opinion argued that it was permissible to sign a truce with Israel. The argument was presented by Sheikh Abdul Mohsen al-Obeikan who strayed from the traditional norms of Salafis and said "min al-Siyasah Ala Natdakhal bel Syasah" (it is good policy to quit policy). This sanctioned a truce with Israel by citing Islamic historical practices toward Jews. He said that "resorting to peace, reconciliation or political and peaceful solutions with the Jews is needed at this time for the lack of Islamic might to liberate by force what is righteously theirs" (Asharq al-Awsat, July 27).

Second, the Shiites' glory and increasing popularity after the Lebanon war in the Arab world caused concern among Salafi-Jihadis. They were afraid that they would lose the lead role in the global jihad. Salafi-Jihadis have expressed many times that they are leading the global Islamic liberation war. Consequently, the analogies drawn between Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah and al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in the Arab street were in favor of Nasrallah. The analogy was that Nasrallah is a nationalist leader with political legitimacy who is fighting the direct enemy Israel; bin Laden, on the other hand, is a global leader who is fighting the indirect enemy, the United States, without credible political justifications (CNN Arabic, September 16). The Salafi-Jihadi fears of losing the lead role were expressed by Ayman al-Zawahiri, who, on September 11 of this year, threatened to take revenge on Israel and called upon the Muslim nation to fight the "Zionists and crusaders." Al-Zawahiri added that "al-Qaeda cannot standby and watch missiles fall on our people in Palestine and Lebanon," a statement perceived by many as an attempt by al-Qaeda to pull the rug from underneath Hezbollah.

Third, the center-wing faction became divided during the conflict in Lebanon. While this division started with the release of al-Odeh and al-Hawali from prison, it culminated when the Lebanon conflict began. After their release from prison, both sheikhs became more traditional and less radical. This caused elements of the center-wing faction to move further away from al-Odeh and al-Hawali, yet not all the way into the Salafi-Jihadi camp. These new elements can be labeled the "conservative" center-wing faction and they have been led by Nasser al-Omar, who replaced the ailing Safar al-Hawali. The conservative center-wing faction has refused to support Hezbollah and the Shiites, while the more traditional center-wing faction has supported Hezbollah in its latest conflict with Israel. The division in the center-wing was manifested in a fatwa issued by Nasser al-Omar prohibiting support for Hezbollah. On the other hand, al-Odeh, who represents the traditional center-wing, called for the postponement of internal Islamic struggles—such as Sunni-Shiite violence—promising to debate these issues at a later stage (al-Hayat, August 25).

Conclusion

In the wake of the divisions over the Lebanon war, the proclamations of the conservative center-wing faction are in concurrence with Salafi-Jihadis. In the September issue of al-Bayan magazine, published in London, an article was published warning of the rise of the Shiites after the Lebanon war. In an article entitled "Lets be Frank, Salafi is the Last Defense Line," the writer indicated that Hezbollah is active in upholding the interests of Iran, Syria and the Shiites, therefore the victory of Hezbollah serves an Iranian expansionist policy that aims to strengthen Shiite penetration and dissemination of Shiite ideology through fueling minorities and sectarian disputes among Sunnis. The writer calls upon world Salafis to unite. Furthermore, he reiterates the need to develop genuine political rhetoric so that Salafi ideology appeals to more Muslims.

With each new conflict in the Middle East, the Salafi movement has experienced divisions, which have created new strains within the movement. Yet, as each new strain forms, it becomes more radical in nature and closely resembles the ideology of the Salafi-Jihadis. The conflict in Lebanon furthered this trend, and the intensifying sectarian violence in Iraq between Sunnis and Shiites is also playing an important role that will only increase tension over time. It is likely that this increase will result in added strength to the Salafi-Jihadi movement and this may cause severe security problems for the Gulf States when these veteran Salafi-Jihadis begin returning to their home countries.

Notes

1. Yousef al-Ayyiri, Fadlan Inbatiho Siran ("Please Lie Down Secretly"), 2002, http://www.albatar.org.
2. Yousef al-Ayyiri, Letter to Safar al-Hawali, 2002, http://www.albatar.org.
3. The campaign was an effort to explain the righteousness of Islamic causes. It primarily consisted of a website at http://www.qawim.org. Its general secretary was al-Hawali.
4. Ibid.
5. Ibid.
6. Sawt al-Jihad, Issue 5, p. 34-35.

 
 

Find this article at:

    http://www.jamestown.org/terrorism/news/article.php?articleid=2370171



TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: islam; lebanon

1 posted on 10/25/2006 7:42:27 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

save for later read


2 posted on 10/25/2006 8:04:24 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Really good article...I wonder if it is truthful.

I am getting paranoid about anything in the media anymore, especially where the Muslims are concerned.


3 posted on 10/25/2006 8:07:12 PM PDT by Txsleuth (EVERYONE VOTE---AND VOTE REPUBLICAN,...even if you have to hold your nose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach; Bahbah; Mo1; MNJohnnie; sofaman; STARWISE; debg; Sage 1; Lizarde

PING


4 posted on 10/25/2006 8:08:57 PM PDT by Txsleuth (EVERYONE VOTE---AND VOTE REPUBLICAN,...even if you have to hold your nose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Interesting article. Thanks for posting.

(Why isn't terrorist Nasrallah dead yet?)


5 posted on 10/25/2006 8:18:02 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
...the Shiites' glory and increasing popularity after the Lebanon war in the Arab world caused concern among Salafi-Jihadis. They were afraid that they would lose the lead role in the global jihad.

The Iranians never really did relinquish this lead, it was just that bin Laden managed a theatrical coup de main that got a lot of people in the madrasas (where the Salafi really do have a tremendous advantage) screaming that the Shi'ites had been passed by in revolutionary passion. It wasn't actually the case. The Shi'ites possess a state behind them and the Salafi, for all the suspicion in the West toward the Saudi government's intentions, do not. The upshot is that the Shi'ites are contemplating the acquisition of nuclear weapons and a proxy army in Hizbollah and the Salafi have found themselves on the outside looking in.

The enemy of our enemy is not our friend. Both of these sides want to kill us and the only real contest is to see who gets the most credit.

6 posted on 10/25/2006 8:43:11 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Just to lay a little background

Encyclopaedia of the Orient
http://i-cias.com/e.o/salafism.htm
Salafism

Arabic: salafiyya
Also called: Salafiyyah, Salafi Islam


A number of interpretations of Islam within its Sunni branch, which claims that the true Islam rests with the practice of the earliest Muslims, the followers of Muhammad.
As is, Salafism is used in so many different meanings that it has become very confusing. Either the term is employed to identify important characteristics of many conservative Muslim groups which are known by other names, or it is used as names for some distinct orientations.

Among the most commonly accepted ways of using the term, is to designate Wahhabism, although the wahhabis promote another term, Muwahhidun.
Often Salafism is also used as another name of Islamism. The most extremist groups are distinguished by being called Jihadist-Salafis.

When Salafism is used as an actual name, it is of the moderate, modernist reorientation of Islam as defined by the Egyptian Mufti, Muhammad Abduh, early in the 20th century. He used the principle of the pious forefathers, the salafiyya to create his understanding of Islam in a modern world. He asserted that they represented a rational and practical understanding of the society. From this, he claimed that Islam both had the capacity to, and was forced to adjust to modernity. He claimed that ijtihad (legal independent judgement based upon case law or past precedent) still could be performed. Despite being a moderate of his time, his teachings seems to have been taken up by the founders of Islamism, transforming them into a strict and rigid system without will to compromise and the will to resolve the unsolvable by violence.

Attempts to systemize Salafis have resulted in divisions like this:

1. Jihadist or Jihadist-Salafis, would be extremist groups willing to use violence and terror to promote their views.
2. Salafis, would be those who reject violence, but share the same belief in the value of imitating the earliest Muslims.
3. Islamists, which is used in this context to indicate that there are Islamists who cannot be labelled Salafis, simply because they are willing to interpret the principles of Islam. This appears to be a construction, mainly because this understanding of Islamism places it within moderate Islam.
4. Discontented Muslims, would be used to indicate Muslims in favour of change, but wanting to use more than just the basic principles of Islam to bring that through.

With the two first understandings of Salafism, it involves a great degree of imitation of every aspect of the lives of the first Muslims. Being an orientation ascetic in nature, there is a great focus on laws and punishments, with the claim that correct actions of an entire society will lead to rewards in terms of safety, stability, welfare and progress.

Central to understand the confusing variation of using the term is principally linked to the different understandings of how and why the earliest Muslims acted. Judged from Muslim sources they can be interpreted as acting out in perfect guidance with God, or as acting as normal humans resolving normal problems of a society but with firsthand knowledge of the divine truth.

Central for a true Salafi is to value tawhid, identifying God in everything, from ordinary actions to any form of worship. Also to reject what they consider bid'a, inventions to the religion. This has caused tension with the beliefs of Sufis and Shi'is, the veneration of prophets and saints and the celebration of the birthday of Muhammad. Still most Salafis support other forms of bid'a, like the building of minarets on mosques.

For Salafis, growing a long beard and wearing a long robe of the dishdasha style are popular accessories and indicators of belonging.


7 posted on 10/25/2006 9:12:31 PM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
One mans opinion freely given...and worth almost that much.

Over the years I've found The Jamestown Foundation to be a very credible source of information. What you won't find is any nuke em all or Robert Spencer type of articles.




Remember just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
8 posted on 10/25/2006 9:24:30 PM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
If they can't make it this year (Loss might ruin Democrats for good)

Sulfur Island

American Exceptionalism

From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

9 posted on 10/25/2006 9:31:23 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
If they can't make it this year (Loss might ruin Democrats for good)

Now there's a pleasant thought!
10 posted on 10/25/2006 9:55:11 PM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Thanks for the link & Salafi post.


11 posted on 10/25/2006 10:09:57 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


12 posted on 10/25/2006 10:30:00 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill; Valin

Thanks for giving the article greater context. BTTT!


13 posted on 10/26/2006 5:01:16 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. also

2006israelwar or WOT

..................

14 posted on 10/26/2006 6:56:07 AM PDT by SJackson (A vote is like a rifle, its usefulness depends upon the character of the user, T. Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

Over theyears I've found the Encyclopaedia of the Orient to be a good source of info.

http://i-cias.com/e.o/


15 posted on 10/26/2006 7:17:41 AM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson