[grey_whiskers]

No, I already answered it in the original post, explaining why your turn of phrase (tho' condescending) revealed a lack of critical thought. I even supplied the "missing thought links" for you; and followed up with the post you just responded to.

So, what is it you *meant* when you called it a "game" ...?

Cheers!

[ml1954]

Here is my point ...."trying to claim the evidence shows the earth and the universe are 6000 years old is just plain nuts and inherently anti-science".

Throw out the 'just plain nuts' if you find it offensive. That shortens it to..."trying to claim the evidence shows the earth and the universe are 6000 years old is inherently anti-science."

Leading up to that I indicated that believing God just made it all look older by performing miracles at least accepts that science is correct in it's analysis and interpretation of the evidence and data.

Instead of addressing this you chose to lecture and scold me using phrases like "it looks like something between a sneer and propaganda" and "And if they *are* miracles, then science won't be able to explain them, by definition. Why you feel that means the word must be used as a perjorative is another matter..". And that is the game you are playing.