I'm not trained in the field, but others are and although there are not as many "doubting" radiometricians as there are like you in your camp, I suggest that as the scientist you claim to be that you begin questioninng your beliefs and your "science" - science is not written in stone you know. Genius men of science of the past really and truly believed in the theory of humors causing disease for example...or understanding human behavior by measuring skulls....phrenology was it?
When I have time I will look up the "other side' in your field however. Are you familiar with the critical literature or is your field one sided and intellectually blocked to any inquiry?
When I have time I will look up the "other side' in your field however. Are you familiar with the critical literature or is your field one sided and intellectually blocked to any inquiry?
I am familiar with both the literature on radiocarbon dating and with the creationist websites' distortions of that literature.
I welcome questions at any time.
I may be the only poster on FR who has actual experience with radiocarbon dating (coming up on 30 years worth), so I will try to explain things as well as I can.