To: LS
I'm becoming more convinced that the misrepresentation of the polls is a planned tactic so that when the Republicans don't lose the House and Senate the MSM and their partners in crime, the Democrats, can scream voter fraud.
I would like to have a nickel for every time, after November 7, we hear the words "Diebold", "intimidation", "disenfranchisement",... well you get the picture.
22 posted on
10/25/2006 10:23:09 AM PDT by
Clink
("Government is not the solution, government is the problem".--Ronald Reagan)
To: Clink
You know, Clink, I blew this Diebold stuff off as sheer nonsense . . . until today, on the faculty/staff list, I got an e-mail to "all" from someone in the department warning "whether you plan to vote Dem, Repub, or Indy, . . ." then went on about Diebold machines malfunctioning, and urging people to vote absentee, ending with, "Contrary to what you may have heard, EVERY absentee ballot is counted."
It seems that this can only help Rs, who significantly outdo Dems in the absentee business. But you are definitely right about the Diebold/conspiracy stuff starting up.
39 posted on
10/25/2006 3:00:55 PM PDT by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: Clink
I'm becoming more convinced that the misrepresentation of the polls is a planned tactic so that when the Republicans don't lose the House and Senate the MSM and their partners in crime, the Democrats, can scream voter fraud.
**
I think you are definitely onto something there. I think Bush's wins in 2000 and 2004 would have been a lot more lopsided were it not for the immense Rat voter fraud machine. It just so happened that the turnout for Bush was just large enough to overwhelm all of the fraudulent Rat votes, especially in precincts where turnout was mysteriously 100% or more.
76 posted on
10/26/2006 11:36:26 AM PDT by
Bigg Red
(Never trust Democrats with national security.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson