Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Get chipped.
1 posted on 10/25/2006 6:13:35 AM PDT by zek157
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: zek157

And live longer.....


2 posted on 10/25/2006 6:14:58 AM PDT by misterrob (Bill Clinton, The Wizard of "Is")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157; IslandJeff

YAY!

This is wonderful news!


3 posted on 10/25/2006 6:16:21 AM PDT by JRochelle (You can believe what you want, but you can't have your own facts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157
Great for diabetics.
Just a thought though - chips that can detect levels of certain chemicals in the blood may have other more intrusive uses as well.
4 posted on 10/25/2006 6:20:25 AM PDT by mollynme (cogito, ergo freepum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157

this is great, as a Type 1 diabetic under tight blood sugar control, this would save me from sticking my fingers 6 to 8 times a day!


6 posted on 10/25/2006 6:27:35 AM PDT by Bottom_Gun (Crush depth dummy - proud NRA member & Certified Instructor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157

Wow.... Prolly a ways from the market, and plenty of hurdles to go, but my diabetic son could use something like this.


7 posted on 10/25/2006 6:28:55 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157

Slave the output to an insulin pump and Voila! - an artificial pancreas.


8 posted on 10/25/2006 6:28:59 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (USAF Air Rescue "That others may live.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157; JRochelle; Bottom_Gun
Note of caution. Just because they got a patent doen't mean the technology either works or is practical (and it depends a GREAT deal on what was specifically patented). The patent may just be a "paper patent" with the idea of combining an "imaginary" glucose sensor with an implantable RFID chip.

The HUGE bug-bear for this approach is that there is, as yet, no known technology for glucose sensing with the necessary analytical reliability, ESPECIALLY in the relatively hostile environment of the human body (basically sea water).

My area of expertise is analytical chemistry, much of which has involved sensor design and development. A LOT of research has been done trying to come up with a really good, really reliable, accurate and precise sensor for glucose. AFAIK, no success yet.

10 posted on 10/25/2006 6:35:05 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157

Make one sensitive to ethanol, put a scanner in a car, and you'd reduce drunk driving incidents (the chip would be mandated by court order after judicial due process).


11 posted on 10/25/2006 6:35:49 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157

If it works or if it at the least leads to something that works, it is great news for me. Type 1 since Sept '81.


13 posted on 10/25/2006 6:53:28 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157

Thanks for the stock tip! Just bought 2000 shares.


14 posted on 10/25/2006 7:11:13 AM PDT by itslex71 (southern by birth, republican by the grace of my dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157

Resistance is futile.


15 posted on 10/25/2006 7:17:26 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Show them no mercy, for you shall receive none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157

This will be highly significant if it works as advertised. Diabetes is a horrible disease to have and must be monitored very closely. And we should all watch this closely; even those who are in the range of "pre-diabetes" which suggests full blown diabetes is a high risk. That's something everyone should keep their eye on and not just diagnosed diabetes. The range now has been lowered to anything over 100 on the glucose levels. About 126 and you're a diabetic for life. Mine is at 103 and I watch that very carefully and am trying to get it below 100 with some weight loss.


16 posted on 10/25/2006 7:43:51 AM PDT by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157

Not what they need to do is install readers at donut shops and make the wearers insert a dollar bill each time they want to read the glucose level.


19 posted on 10/25/2006 8:40:24 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157

I have a 9 year old with type 1. I've been hearing about this for some time. From what I've heard the external closed loop system is in trials right now. I could care less about the implantable tester. Right now the closed loop system looks extremely promising.


22 posted on 10/25/2006 9:26:20 AM PDT by pray boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zek157

Super duper....this is so great.

My granddaughter's little bitty fingers are getting so scarred from finger pricks! 3 years already, and she is only 8.

Actually, she also has had such a build up of scar tissue from her insulin shots, that she has had to go 4-5 months at a time, not using her upper arms or thighs..

If this thingy works, though, it will really help. Thanks for posting it.


24 posted on 10/25/2006 1:17:33 PM PDT by Txsleuth (EVERYONE VOTE---AND VOTE REPUBLICAN,...even if you have to hold your nose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson