Posted on 10/24/2006 4:14:02 PM PDT by wagglebee
TORONTO, Ontario, October 19, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Ontario Superior Court Chief Justice Roy McMurtry, who was accused earlier this year of pro-homosexual bias on his same-sex marriage cases, has stepped forward to hear another potentially major precedent setting case brought forward by homosexual activists.
Three justices were originally assigned to take the case involving a lesbian womans claim for full parenting rights as a third legal parent for her partners child, the first of its kind in Canada. Chief Justice Roy McMurtry showed up as a replacement for one of the assigned justices on the day of the case hearing.
REAL Women of Canada, a womens rights organization, filed a formal complaint against Justice McMurtry with the Canadian Judicial Council in July 2006, alleging judicial misconduct for his participation in a case that had potentially personal significance for the judge.
McMurtrys 2003 decision on the Halpern case, which effectively overturned Canadas traditional definition of marriage, was unduly influenced by his personal and familial interest in the case, REAL Women charged. The organization had learned that McMurtrys daughter was in a lesbian live-in relationship with another woman.
Further, the organization charged McMurtry with deliberately selecting judges sympathetic to same-sex marriage to hear the case. Justice McMurtry, along with a group of other prominent Ontario judges, had close ties to the homosexual activist movement and were on a special guest list of dignitaries at a celebration during the 2003 Gay Pride week.
McMurtry was photographed along with several other judges at the party with Kevin Bourassa and Joe Varnell, the two principals in the Halpern case.
See related LifeSiteNews coverage:
Ontario Well on Way to Declaring More Than Two Legal Parents For Children
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/aug/06083103.html
Judge Who Gave Canada Homosexual "Marriage" Had Conflict of Interest Says Women's Rights Group
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jul/06071907.html
The Activist Judges Behind the Ontario Homosexual 'Marriage' Ruling
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2003/jun/03061101.html
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Bizarre.
Plaintiff shouldn't be allowed anywhere near anybody's kids, IMO.
Ping
This is sick.
Looks like the 9th Circus has a branch in Canada.
Oh Canada.... [shaking my head] :)
Please send me a FReepmail to get on or off this Canada ping list.
Heather Has Two Mommies was bad enough. Now, it's Heather Has Two Mommies and a Daddy. If this trend continues, legalized polygamy won't be far behind.
Roy McMurtry: shameless legal hack,
Canada's most openly corrupt Judge
Professor Lorraine Weinrib and Chief Justice
Roy McMurtry, Court of Appeal of Ontario
hold up a newspaper announcing same-sex history
The International Lesbian and Gay Law Association
Conference, Toronto, June /05, themed "Rights are Right"
Source
The absence of a law, is in itself , a law.
"Unjust law is no law at all" ~ St. Augustine
"Heather Has Two Mommies was bad enough. Now, it's Heather Has Two Mommies and a Daddy. If this trend continues, legalized polygamy won't be far behind."
Wonder what Daddy had to say about this. Being it went to court, I could guess. More elimination of father's rights??
Next thing it will be three way marriages and polygamy.
***********
I fear you are correct.
The motive here is to use children in a setting of degenerates to advance the cause of degeneracy. Imagine what young age this child will be used in their group sex machinations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.