Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/24/2006 11:57:12 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: tobyhill
Absolutely delusional.
2 posted on 10/24/2006 11:59:56 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Well of course it's true. As Rush once said, they're all idealist moonbats that think they're going to save the world from all its troubles. (Rush didn't say "moonbats" though)


4 posted on 10/24/2006 12:02:01 PM PDT by subterfuge (Tolerance has become the greatest virtue, and hypocrisy the worst character defect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
Note: When the media-bias issue was raised in one long-ago chat, Weingarten asserted, essentially, that journalists are more liberal than the average person because they are better informed than the average person.

Uh... can I get a barf bag, please. Can you super-size that? Yeah, thanks.

Is there no end to their arrogance?
5 posted on 10/24/2006 12:02:50 PM PDT by RedCell ("...thou shalt kill thine enemy before he killeth you by any means available" - Dick Marcinko)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
"Note: When the media-bias issue was raised in one long-ago chat, Weingarten asserted, essentially, that journalists are more liberal than the average person because they are better informed than the average person."

That is laughable.

6 posted on 10/24/2006 12:04:27 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

All I need to know about the problem with the media can be traced back to an interview given by Tim Russert to the dark haired female reporter who used to sit on the Mclauglin Report panel. Can't think of her name but this is her reason for getting into Journalism - To influence policy. She said she grew up helping to raise an autistic sibling and decided she could do the most good for the cause by being a journalist and making people aware.

Remove yourself from the good cause of helping people who have autism in their lives and consider it is not the reporter's job to influence public policy. Too many people who get into the media today see it as a shortcut to political power. That is dangerous.


9 posted on 10/24/2006 12:05:41 PM PDT by kinghorse (I calls them like I sees them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
...we think the Dems are better this year...

It would never occur to them to ask whether the Dems or Reps are better this year. Do fish ask whether the water is wetter this year?

11 posted on 10/24/2006 12:06:37 PM PDT by omega4412 (Multiculturalism kills. 9/11, Beslan, Madrid, London)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
This does not mean there is no subtle bias.

About as subtle as Goebbels or Pravda.

The bias is strong and obvious to anybody with an education beyond the 7th grade level. Unfortunately, that's only about 52% of the population.

15 posted on 10/24/2006 12:08:35 PM PDT by meyer (A vote for amnesty is a vote against America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

I missed the part where he explained why journalist lean left. Certainly nothing that infuriated me.


16 posted on 10/24/2006 12:08:51 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

save


17 posted on 10/24/2006 12:09:44 PM PDT by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

"Yes, we are somewhat liberal, and it will totally surprise you why.... We think we are SMART and you are dumb." hahahah.


21 posted on 10/24/2006 12:13:38 PM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
Incredible arrogance, absolutely incredible.

In my experience, professional journalists are less informed about many subjects than people of comparable intelligence and education in other fields. In science, history, business, military affairs, and global geo-politics, professional journalists are notoriously ill-informed and gullible.

The reason is not hard to figure out. Their education is in how to communicate and not in the subjects of that communication. Further, media of all kinds are phenomenally competitive and this tends to skew the personality profiles of those who are likely to be successful. The real reason for political and social bias in the media has to do with the need to set oneself apart in simple, indeed simplistic, terms; and to cater to the commercial requirements of advertisers. The latter is often unconcious but advertising requirements do favor certain biases and attitudes.

For more on this very important issue, I could not do better than to recommend Thomas M. Franks' landmark cultural history, The Conquest of Cool. This is a damning indictment of the media culture and Franks' status as a high-profile leftist only helps his credibility.

25 posted on 10/24/2006 12:15:39 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (Islamo-terrorists: Strike force of the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Alert the media!


26 posted on 10/24/2006 12:16:25 PM PDT by tom paine 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
"I'll tell you, though, that most good writers are aware of their biases"

Therein lies the core of this article. Most everyone is biased. Few journalists will admit their biases. I think this means that most journalists are not "good writers".

27 posted on 10/24/2006 12:18:34 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
Articles like: Democratic blowout predicted this year, infuriate me. You never see the converse: "Republicans to blowout Democrats this year". It is free advertising for the Democrats.

This business that they lean sometimes to the left is preposterous. Just switch democrats for republican in the article and ask if you have never, or would you ever see an article like that?

Do you see the media going ga-ga over Republicans as they have democrats like Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama? Using terms like Brilliant, Genius, like they do over the democrats. Not, just no you don't, but h*ll No!

The bias is so blatant, especially in election years, but it is translating into few viewers and fewer reader every month. The Main Stream Media are dying, it is no longer a question of will they die, but when.

28 posted on 10/24/2006 12:19:11 PM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
Rush seems to be well informed...he ain't liberal!
30 posted on 10/24/2006 12:21:25 PM PDT by Edgerunner (Democrats break...Republicans fix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
Journalists as a general rule probably are pretty suspicious of the religious right.

Read: Journalists loathe the religeous right.

32 posted on 10/24/2006 12:28:12 PM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
When the media-bias issue was raised in one long-ago chat, Weingarten asserted, essentially, that journalists are more liberal than the average person because they are better informed than the average person.

"Our ratings and subcriptions are in the toilet, but gosh darnit, we're better, we're smarter, and people like us!"

34 posted on 10/24/2006 12:32:09 PM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("By the time I'm finished with you, you're gonna wish you felt this good again" - Jack Bauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
Weingarten asserted, essentially, that journalists are more liberal than the average person because they are better informed than the average person.

No, it's because they're LESS informed than the average person. They don't know the facts, just their own biased opinion.
37 posted on 10/24/2006 12:52:02 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill; All
From my file "89% Voted"( for Clinton...)--

Public disclosure: Media are finally admitting their biases.

D.C. journalists favor Kerry 12 to 1: N.Y. Times informal poll confirms media lean left

Creator of 'Mr. Sterling' Admits: We TV Writers Are '99% Leftist'

Professor's Study Shows Liberal Bias in News Media

No Bias in Media, ha ha, tee hee

---92% voted for Clinton.

-Poll confirms Ivy League liberal tilt--

The Politics of Hollywood


From my own files:

-The Old Grey Info-Slut... the NYT/Jayson Blair Affair--

-The Access of Evil-- CNN's Duplicity --

-That "Rush" to Judgment- Limbaugh Links--

Scams, Scalawags, and an all-too-gullible Public...famous frauds sold to America

-The lies of Paul Krugman-( BLAIR, BRAGG, DOWD ... KRUGMAN? ) --

-60 Minutes to Infamy- those forged memos and The Shot Heard Round the World--

42 posted on 10/24/2006 1:03:29 PM PDT by backhoe ("It's so Easy to spend somebody else's Money..."[ My Dad. circa 1958 ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
I can tell you there is NEVER any covert hidden agenda, wherein editors will say or think or act on the notion of: "Hey, the election is coming up and we think the Dems are better this year, so let's have some nice stories about them to help sway the votes." Never happens.

Statements of absolutes like always and never are most often complete BS.

43 posted on 10/24/2006 1:05:35 PM PDT by Petronski (CNN is an insidiously treasonous, enemy propaganda organ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson