They are even worse science-deniers than the ones in the US. Well, just as bad.
"Research shows that dinosaurs and man were contemporaries. In every culture, there are indications that we remember (dinosaurs).
All that's lacking is scientific evidence. Old stories are nice, but look at all those dinosaur fossils--none of which are in association with human fossils (or even primate fossils).
Look at all those early hominid fossils--none of which are in association with dinosaur fossils.
Even most creationists admit those footprints in Texas are faked.
And this is supposed to be evidence for dinosaurs and man living contemporaneously? What a laugh!
And don't try to pin down Creationism as being racist, it is clearly stated that all mankind are descended from one man (twice, Adam and more recently Noah), and that mankind is of one blood, and that there is neither Jew nor Greek, etc. In contrast, Macroevolution states that mankind has been separated for many thousands of years (according to them, homo sapiens--used to be homo sapiens sapiens) is some 200,000 years old?) during which evolution is still occuring, including evolution of the brain. It brings the rules of natural selection from the animal, plant, protist, fungi, and bacteria kingdoms (etc.) and tries to apply it to humans, too, even today, after the explicit term Social Darwinism is shunned.