To: RadioAstronomer
Under ordinary circumstances, such citations should be from established scientific organizations, but--as you ALREADY KNOW--those organizations are hardly unbiased. Why would they acknowledge that support for their current religious explanation of origins is waning? Creationism is popping up all over the news, with polls of people who support Creationism in large numbers. If the average Joe is increasingly skeptical of Macroevolutionism, surely it is logical that an increasing amount of scientists would be, too?
100 posted on
10/24/2006 8:25:34 PM PDT by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( The r/l thing is Japanese, not pan-Asian, and, in any case, making a mockery of it is rude.)
To: Jedi Master Pikachu
Creationism is popping up all over the news, with polls of people who support Creationism in large numbers. If the average Joe is increasingly skeptical of Macroevolutionism, surely it is logical that an increasing amount of scientists would be, too? Sorry, that happens not to be the case.
106 posted on
10/24/2006 8:59:18 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson