Posted on 10/24/2006 10:55:25 AM PDT by lizol
These are deep conclussions... from evolution theory to anti-Semitism?
You know, don't you, that "that's sooo condescending" is from one of the earlier Geico Caveman commercials. Delivered with a little snort and an effete toss of the head by the caveman tickling the ivories of the baby grand.
I believe I went out with a couple of Neanderthal women, my first year in college.
:') Nope, not doin' it. ;')
The Neandertal EnigmaFrayer's own reading of the record reveals a number of overlooked traits that clearly and specifically link the Neandertals to the Cro-Magnons. One such trait is the shape of the opening of the nerve canal in the lower jaw, a spot where dentists often give a pain-blocking injection. In many Neandertal, the upper portion of the opening is covered by a broad bony ridge, a curious feature also carried by a significant number of Cro-Magnons. But none of the alleged 'ancestors of us all' fossils from Africa have it, and it is extremely rare in modern people outside Europe." [pp 126-127]
by James Shreeve
Hmmm - I've often said the same thing...
somebody wake up on the wrong side of the rock???
D'OH!!
Yeah that new caveman ad with the split-screen is even more hilarious.
They are even worse science-deniers than the ones in the US. Well, just as bad.
"Research shows that dinosaurs and man were contemporaries. In every culture, there are indications that we remember (dinosaurs).
All that's lacking is scientific evidence. Old stories are nice, but look at all those dinosaur fossils--none of which are in association with human fossils (or even primate fossils).
Look at all those early hominid fossils--none of which are in association with dinosaur fossils.
Even most creationists admit those footprints in Texas are faked.
And this is supposed to be evidence for dinosaurs and man living contemporaneously? What a laugh!
Actually this is kind of refreshing in contrast to mewling American creationists who whine like liberal intellectual relativists/nihilists about "fairness," "balance" and teaching "both sides". I mean the guy is an idiot, but at least he has the courage of his convictions; and however preposterous his claims, he's at least willing to follow them to their obvious and logical conclusions.
If you genuinely believe evolution is a "lie" and/or pseudoscience, then of course it follows that you should advocate its exclusion from science curricula. But here, on these very threads, we have creationists baldly assert that evolution is a lie, but insist they wouldn't think of banning it and only want to "balance" it with creationism or ID.
They take the position that idea "A" is utterly lacking in merit, and indeed is thoroughly invidious, and that idea "B" is both true and socially beneficent, but want both taught as equally valid!
the 1st one ordered the 'duck with..."
the second one didn't "have much of an appetite"
What problems would those be?
Just another uneducated stupid moonbat.
Cite sources please. And not some creationist screed from an uninformed and biased website please.
[pinging Coyote since he knows about this stuff professionally]
It's my understanding (don't have time to research right now) that Neanderthals had a differently-shaped rib cage. If this is so, why not produce an x-ray of a living person with that sort of bone structure? I've never seen such a thing.
I asked Dave to share with us just one reason he thinks the evidence doesn't support evolution. It's been well over a full day now, with no response.
Did you actually expect one?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.