Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Campus Jihad
Wall Street Journal ^ | October 23, 2006 | Anthony Glees

Posted on 10/23/2006 4:31:39 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

LONDON -- U.K. intelligence officials have just provided a chilling assessment of the terrorist threat Britain faces. The country has become "al Qaeda target No. 1," security sources told me, confirming last week's press reports. Intelligence services now judge Britain's "home grown" terrorists to be organized, trained and controlled either directly from Pakistan or via Pakistani networks in Britain.

Until now, intelligence services thought British Islamist terrorists had no hard links to al Qaeda despite sharing its ideology. "Clean skins" in the security jargon, they were believed to have acted alone or in self-constructed cells. This theory was the product of what MI5 thought it knew about the terrorists before last year's July 7 bombings, which was far too little. Just two months before the attacks, MI5's Joint Terrorism Analysis Center concluded, "there is not a group with both the current intent and capability to attack the U.K."

The ringleaders of the July 7 bombers, Mohammed Siddique Khan and Shahzad Tanweer, both former students at Leeds Metropolitan University, showed up on MI5's radar on as many as nine occasions before the attacks. According to Whitehall sources, credible intelligence indicated that Mr. Khan had visited Pakistan between November 2003 and February 2004 and sought to contact al Qaeda. But MI5 discounted the significance of these visits at the time and only started taking them more seriously early this year. The London bombers' connections to Pakistan were initially dismissed as harmless, requiring no further analysis. It was "obvious," security sources explained in the aftermath of the attacks, that people of Pakistani descent would visit "their families" back home or take a "long holiday or gap year" there. The generally accepted theory was that the terrorists had simply used information from the Internet to build their organic peroxide bombs.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: campuses; college; colleges; enemywithin; england; eurabia; fifthcolumn; greatbritain; islam; islamists; islamofascism; islamofascists; jihad; jihadists; koranimals; londonbombings; londonistan; moslems; muslims; professors; radicalislam; radicalmuslims; religionofpeace; religionofpieces; rop; sharia; terror; terrorism; terrorists; trop; uk; universities; wot
If anyone can find a link to this article on a free site, feel free to post the link so that non-subscribers can read the article.
1 posted on 10/23/2006 4:31:40 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; Mrs Ivan

BTTT!


2 posted on 10/23/2006 4:34:50 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Non-smoker who hates smoking nazis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

And the gun grabbers want to take OUR guns away-NO WAY!!!


3 posted on 10/23/2006 4:36:50 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The Brits better get their shit together before they don't have any left.


4 posted on 10/23/2006 4:39:47 PM PDT by NurdlyPeon (Wearing My 'Jammies Proudly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I'm thinkin' "our partner/ally Pakistan" falls under the same oximoron as "the peaceful religion of Islam"


5 posted on 10/23/2006 4:54:25 PM PDT by Hambone02 (Need I say more?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NurdlyPeon
sometimes....as in chess....moves that felt good early on, will be your downfall in the endgame..
6 posted on 10/23/2006 4:58:50 PM PDT by M-cubed (Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hambone02

The ally in Pakistan is the government. Evidently our enemies agree: Islamist air force officers tried to stage a coup recently, while Musharraf was visiting the US.

The problem is that there are elements in the Pakistani intelligence services and armed forces that are on the other side, and the government's writ doesn't run throughout its nominal territory.

The Sunni tribesmen in Waziristan are definitely on the other side, but I've not heard of any terrorism perpetrated by Shi'ite 'seveners' (a.k.a. Ismaelis) who make up the bulk of Pakistan's professional class (well not at least since the Mongols got done dealing with them, way back when).


7 posted on 10/23/2006 5:11:58 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: M-cubed
sometimes....as in chess....moves that felt good early on, will be your downfall in the endgame..

"felt good". That's the heart of the problem. Too many people are being "tolerant" because it makes them "feel good", like they are doing something noble and enlightened. One of the differences between children and adults is that adults understand that just because something feels good, or sounds good, or tastes good, doesn't mean that it is good.

8 posted on 10/23/2006 5:12:42 PM PDT by NurdlyPeon (Wearing My 'Jammies Proudly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Just think - if Hitler had been smart he would have invaded Britain under the cloak of religion. Gotta hand it to mohammed (piss on him), he picked a great imperialist tool.


9 posted on 10/23/2006 5:14:24 PM PDT by gotribe (It's not a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

"The problem is that there are elements in the Pakistani intelligence services and armed forces that are on the other side, and the government's writ doesn't run throughout its nominal territory."

Same in our State Department, CIA etc.


10 posted on 10/23/2006 5:35:39 PM PDT by stubernx98 (cranky, but reasonable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson