Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anthrax - New York Times ORDERED to name confidential sources
Court Docket - Hatfill v The New York Times ^ | October 23, 2006 | EdLake

Posted on 10/23/2006 9:00:24 AM PDT by EdLake

ORDER that Pltf's [83] Motion to Compel the Identity of Deft's Confidential Sources is GRANTED. Deft shall reveal the identity of Confidential Sources #2,#3 and #4, to Pltf no later than Wednesday, 10/25/06 (see Order for details). Signed by Judge Liam O'Grady on 10/20/06. Copies mailed: yes (Copies faxed by chambers) (pmil) (Entered: 10/23/2006)


TOPICS: Anthrax Scare
KEYWORDS: anthrax; hatfill; newyorktimes; nyt; nytimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-214 next last
To: EdReform

Thanks for the ping.


21 posted on 10/23/2006 9:46:42 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet; BIGLOOK

fyi. Crunch time at the NY Slimes.


22 posted on 10/23/2006 9:47:23 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg; Peach; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Cindy; mhking; Enchante; weegee; abb; Milhous

fyi and ping lists.


23 posted on 10/23/2006 9:48:19 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; kcvl; piasa

FYI and indexing.


24 posted on 10/23/2006 9:49:15 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdLake

What ever happened to that Pakistani guy who they were investigating until they were called off and sicced on Hatfill?


25 posted on 10/23/2006 9:49:24 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Thanks for the heads up on this, Grampa Dave.

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

26 posted on 10/23/2006 9:52:14 AM PDT by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
They obviously targeted him but I have to ask. Why did the New York Times target Dr. Hatfill? What motive did they have?

If you go all the way back to the beginning, it was all about the Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention (BTWC) in July and August of 2001. The Bush Administration disrupted that convention because they refused to go along with inspections of bioweapons facilities. They claimed that such conventions wouldn't apply to terrorists, only to countries.

And then a month or two later, someone sent anthrax through the mails. The conspiracy theorists saw it as an act by the Bush Administration to PROVE that inspections were not in the best interests of the United States.

In November of 2001, at the next BTWC meeting, Barbara Hatch Rosenberg gave a speech suggesting that the U.S. government knew who sent the letters. And she started point the finger at Dr. Hatfill without actually naming him.

That was the start of a campaign to get Dr. Hatfill investigated. Nicolas Kristoff was just ONE of the reporters who believed the conspiracy theory. Marilyn Thompson at the Washington Post was another.

And don't forget, there's another lawsuit underway because Vanity Fair Magazine and Readers' Digest Magazine printed an article by Don Foster which pointed the Finger at Dr. Hatfill. There could be a settlement in that case at any moment.

Ed

27 posted on 10/23/2006 9:52:30 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EdLake

All I know is that someone would have to have access to the technology to make weaponized anthrax...


28 posted on 10/23/2006 9:59:13 AM PDT by gman992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
The Right Wing Media has been insisting all along that it was Muslims - even though the evidence says otherwise.

You're joking, I hope?

Of course not. People who want to believe that Muslims did it look for things they can twist to "prove" they are right. They have a whole list of things about how the 9/11 hijackers COULD have been working with anthrax. It doesn't make any difference to them that the 9/11 hijackers were DEAD at the time of the mailings, and that no sign of anthrax was found anywhere they went. They just assume that some other Muslims could have done it, and (until the real culprit is tried and convicted) no one can prove otherwise.

Somehow it makes sense to such people that Muslim terrorists would send anthrax through the mails to two liberal Senators, and that Muslim terrorists would include medical advice in the media letters to make sure no one was harmed, that they'd take precautions to make sure the damage was MINIMAL, and that, even though these Muslim terrorists had anthrax, they didn't use it in a MAJOR bioweapons attack when Afghanistan was invaded, etc.

The idea that Muslims sent the anthrax letters is just plain STUPID. But no one can prove it wrong.

Ed

29 posted on 10/23/2006 10:07:16 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gman992
All I know is that someone would have to have access to the technology to make weaponized anthrax...

And it was stated by General Parker from USAMRIID at the very beginning that the term "weaponized" was not the proper term for the anthrax used in the attacks. He said the term "professionally done" was more appropriate. That means it could have been done by just about any microbiologist. And it could have been made in just about any hospital lab or well-equipped college microbiology lab, and certainly in any professional microbiology lab.

Ed

30 posted on 10/23/2006 10:11:14 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Battle Axe; Peach

ping


31 posted on 10/23/2006 10:16:16 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
What ever happened to that Pakistani guy who they were investigating until they were called off and sicced on Hatfill?

I don't think any "Pakistani guy" was ever seen as a serious suspect. Those Pakistanis who were investigated as a result of a tip because they were throwing out liquids were investigated like a lot of other people, but nothing came of it. There was no reason to link them to the anthrax attacks. The liquid they were throwing out was just water from a dishwasher that broke.

Ed

32 posted on 10/23/2006 10:17:19 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Good deal!


33 posted on 10/23/2006 10:21:37 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EdLake

Thanks for posting the information on this. I too wonder why the MSM hasn't made this known everywhere.


34 posted on 10/23/2006 10:26:58 AM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdLake
Ed, thanks for keeping us updated on this case. To add some background to what you gave here, let's not forget that due to the Oklahoma bombing and to serve the Ciltons' agenda, the worst terrorism facing the US was said to be the "right wing extremists." The FBI was totally immersed in getting the bad white guy terrorists - the real terrorists - not the poor Muslims even though the Muslims bombed the WTC during Clinton's rule and this anthrax attack followed the second Muslim WTC attack.

The Left wanted to divert America's attention and rage from the 911 WTC atrocity (and muddy the waters for Bush's agenda to go after Muslim radicals) back toward fearing the vast right wing conspiracy - angry white American men (who were politically incorrect). As the Democrat party media ran this witch hunt against Hatfield, they were shouting that Ascroft was protecting one of his own (right wing extremist) by not investigating him.
35 posted on 10/23/2006 10:31:45 AM PDT by Texas Chilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EdLake
I would think that an Order compelling the New York Times to name confidential sources would be BIG news.

I agree. Glad you noticed and reported on these happenings..

36 posted on 10/23/2006 10:44:58 AM PDT by syriacus (LORD, bless the good people of Iraq and our troops AND confound those who plot evil against them..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Texas Chilli
I think what's most important to remember is that this whole anthrax investigation has been distorted by BOTH SIDES. The Right has been pointing at Muslims, the Left has been pointing at Dr. Hatfill and the Bush Administration.

Meanwhile, the FBI has presumably been trying to figure out who actually sent the anthrax letters. They've said for years that they were whittling down a list of from 12 to 30 possible suspects.

My personal feelings is that BOTH SIDES are wrong. The culprit was neither a Muslim nor a Right Wing extremist. He was a worried scientist who was absolutely convinced that 9/11 would be followed by a devistating biological attack that could kill MILLIONS, and no one seemed to be taking any measures to prevent it. So, he sent anthrax letters to the media, telling them "THIS IS NEXT" (meaning a biological attack with anthrax is next) and "TAKE PENICILIN NOW" (meaning: take pecautions and protect ourself. Penicillin will protect you from anthrax).

When the media just ignored his first mailings, and when a couple liberal senators were fighting the Patriot Act in order to protect "civil rights" when MILLIONS could die at any moment, the anthrax mailer decided to send something that they couldn't ignore. He sent REFINED anthrax to the two senators.

Ed

37 posted on 10/23/2006 10:50:30 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: geezerwheezer
I too wonder why the MSM hasn't made this known everywhere.

A site called OpinionBug.com is also spreading the word.

Ed

38 posted on 10/23/2006 10:56:18 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EdLake
Good theory, Ed. Is this what the FBI thinks now?

In a way the witch hunt against American white guy (Hatfill)reminded me of Chief Moose's investigation of the snippers... I have a hard time believing someone would be showing their concern and care for our Nation's vulnerability by poisoning American people. That would be one sick ba$tard.
39 posted on 10/23/2006 11:01:01 AM PDT by Texas Chilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Texas Chilli
Is this what the FBI thinks now?

That appears to be what they've been thinking since around November of 2001.

I have a hard time believing someone would be showing their concern and care for our Nation's vulnerability by poisoning American people.

Yes, a lot of people have a hard time believing that. But that doesn't mean it is not true. After all, he did give medical advice in the first mailing and in the second mailing he TOLD the recipients the powder was anthrax. Plus, anthrax does not kill instantly. If there's time to take antibiotics, the risk is a lot less. Plus, he took precautions to limit the exposure -- he taped the letters shut and used a totally phony return address on the Senate letters so there would be no chance that the letters would be returned to a REAL school. (Would a Muslim terrorist have worried about that?)

Ed

40 posted on 10/23/2006 11:12:16 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson