Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRAQ WRAPUP 7-Diplomat 'mispoke' on U.S. arrogance in Iraq
Reuters ^ | 10/22/06 | Claudia Parsons

Posted on 10/22/2006 7:40:03 PM PDT by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Dubya should kick his dumb butt all the way back across the Rio Grande.
1 posted on 10/22/2006 7:40:05 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

There needs to be a pink slip in that little boy's pay envelope...


2 posted on 10/22/2006 7:46:08 PM PDT by redhead (Valley Trash: The beer of champions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
More douche-bags in State I see... state is full of these wieners... mostly the reason they aren't in a more practical section of gov't.

The traitors there are second as dangerous as the moles in the "Justice Dept" the past 6yrs...
3 posted on 10/22/2006 7:47:16 PM PDT by FreedomNeocon (Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I have a feeling he did.
This jerk "misspoke" before and no one stopped him.


4 posted on 10/22/2006 7:48:01 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

No mulligans.

People DIE because of this kind of propgandist BS encouraging the evil ones.


5 posted on 10/22/2006 7:48:07 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I think it's written in the US Diplomat Handbook, don't talk to Al-Jazeera.


6 posted on 10/22/2006 7:48:34 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

This loser needs to be fired. This whole "misspeak" thing is BS and he knows it. A diplomat's job (esp. one as qualified as this jerk, see previous postings.) is to speak the right words at the right time. He didn't misspeak, he knew exactly what he was doing when he dissed the administration.


7 posted on 10/22/2006 7:48:57 PM PDT by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

It is also written to never to tell the truth, when the news is bad.


8 posted on 10/22/2006 7:49:38 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: redhead

If he said this at the New York Club he should get a pink slip. Saying it on Al Jezzerra should get him a bullet. I wonder how many of our young men and women will die as a result of this emboldening statement that will be played over and over again?


9 posted on 10/22/2006 7:50:25 PM PDT by geopyg (If the carrot doesn't work, use the stick. Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

"U.S. State Department official Alberto Fernandez told Al Jazeera television..."

What the heck is anyone in our government doing on the TV channel which touts our enemies (even more than CNN!)???

Fernandez needs to be sent somewhere else, like the dark side of the Moon.




10 posted on 10/22/2006 7:57:02 PM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
You can't have your own diplomats say crap like this, not fire them, and retain any credibility.
11 posted on 10/22/2006 7:57:28 PM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Par for the course from a foggy bottom minion.
12 posted on 10/22/2006 8:00:06 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead (At worst the Pope's comments might cause a "war of words" but mohammedans prefer a "war over words".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
I would hope they would tell the truth even if the news is bad but not to Al-Jazeera or any other media. There is a chain of command for a reason and I've never seen the media as a part of it.
13 posted on 10/22/2006 8:06:45 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Some diplomat! What is he ... channeling Bin Ladin?


14 posted on 10/22/2006 8:09:26 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
That this treasonous bastard still has his job is outrageous! He should have been fired within seconds of finishing the interview.

It's this kind of total crap that's gonna bring on the Second American Revolution. People are getting fed up with Politically Correct squishiness.
15 posted on 10/22/2006 8:32:15 PM PDT by upchuck (Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: LibWhacker
The rest of what he said, which properly was a message to the Arab world to quit being such morons and thinking they 'won' when something goes badly for USA in Iraq, when in fact it is a loss for the Arab world. I frankly think it was a throwaway line to the Arabs to acknowledge "hey, we make mistakes, but our democracy is strong because we admit them. Now, go ahead and start admitting mistakes of your own, dammit" ... : "We focused today, and the media focuses on blame. There is no doubt that there is plenty of room for blame. Blame of the United States or others, but we haven't focused enough on the future and the possibility of failure in Iraq. If we are witnessing failure in Iraq, it's not the failure of the United States alone. Failure would be a disaster for the region. We, all of us in the region, countries in the region, have a role in what is happening in Iraq. Failure in Iraq will be a failure for the United States but a disaster for the region. We must all focus on saving Iraq for the sake of the Iraqi people and for our sakes, us in the West, and also you in the Arab world. I know that sometimes there is a kind of gloating in the Arab world that America has problems in Iraq. I fully understand that. But, in the end, we must think of the Iraqi people, the Arabs, the Muslims and the citizens of Iraq more than gloating about the United States.
17 posted on 10/22/2006 8:46:45 PM PDT by WOSG (Broken-glass time, Republicans! Save the Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
There have been a couple of threads posted re this story. I thought that I read somewhere earlier that the "diplomat" said he was "misinterpreted" and "misquoted", lol. So now he back-pedals and apologizes.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1723739/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1723816/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1723903/posts
18 posted on 10/22/2006 8:46:51 PM PDT by khnyny (God Bless the Republic for which it stands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

...self defeating, seed sowing, fine piece of work.

i have to ask how did one get such a nicely titled job?



ps....when they use arrogance, they REALLY mean I am envious of your accomplishments. I wish our system could deliver the same social benefits of technology, education, jobs and quality of life.


19 posted on 10/22/2006 8:51:01 PM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

From Michelle Malkin:

[It was only last October, you see, when Alberto Fernandez, newly minted by Secretary Condoleezza Rice as director for public diplomacy at State's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, made one of his obligatory "live dialogue" appearances on Islamonline.net. After cooing about the new Iraqi constitution, taking pains to stress that it expressly "recognizes the role of Islam" (thanks in no small part to State's labors), Fernandez proceeded straight to the required gushing over Qaradawi.

But wait a second. Hasn't Qaradawi has been banned from the U.S. for promoting terrorism? Surely the State Department can mount a full-throated defense of that, right? After all, isn't our moral compass supposed to be the Bush Doctrine — the one that says "you're either with us or with the terrorists"? Is it really that hard for State to say Qaradawi is a disgusting character promoting a noxious agenda, rather than a model of moderation?

Apparently. Such a choice, our chic-sensitive public-diplomacy pirector opined, was "for the Muslim Umma to decide." As for the rest of us, Fernandez would brook no denying that it is "important to listen to intelligent and thoughtful voices from the region like Sheikh Qaradawi, ... an important figure that deserves our attention."

You can still see Fernandez's endorsement of Qaradawi right here.

You want to know how Fernandez responded to criticism of his reckless jihadi suck-up remarks? He sniffed that they were "minor" comments, which he made just to be "polite," and were much ado about nothing. Look:

He's still surprised how minor comments get amplified when he does grant a rare English interview. Take the way right-wing pundits singled out one response from a 50-question live forum he did on the English-language Web site Islam Online. Fernandez referred to revivalist Sunni Muslim scholar Yusuf al Qaradawi—the founder of Islam Online—as "a respected scholar and religious leader worthy of the deepest respect." The National Review denounced Fernandez for being a "chic-sensitive" apologist "gushing over Qaradawi," who is banned from U.S. soil for his alleged links to terrorist groups. "It was just some BS answer, just to be polite, and they picked up on that one thing," says Fernandez If this is "the face of the United States in the Middle East," we need to withdraw all State Department bureaucrats from the region, find out what else Fernandez and his Arabic-speaking colleagues have been telling the Arab media, and boot them off the airwaves. Permanently. If showing "politeness" towards suicide bomb-embracing jihadi clerics and showing contempt for our country on enemy airwaves is how we plan to win "hearts and minds," we're screwed.]


20 posted on 10/22/2006 9:01:41 PM PDT by khnyny (God Bless the Republic for which it stands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson