Posted on 10/22/2006 7:06:11 PM PDT by Ladycalif
* * * *
Listen to the JOHN AND KEN SHOW 3pm - 7pm Mon - Friday http://www.johnandkenshow.com/
John and Ken have an idea - work to elect Tan for Congress to send a message to Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez http://www.lorettasanchez.house.gov/
TAN ARTICLE - letter sent immigrants http://ocregister.com/ocregister/homepage/abox/article_1325512.php
VOLUNTEER & VOTE FOR TAN
Join Tan Nguyen and volunteers as they walk our neighborhoods to register voters.
http://65.45.193.26:8026/cms/acct/tan4congress/main/
Meet at: Tan Nguyen for Congress Headquarters 12955 Main St. Garden Grove, CA 92840 Phone: (714) 530-1612 Tues, Wed, and Thurs, meet at 5:00 pm and start walking at 5:30 pm Sat and Sun, meet at 9:30 am, start walking at 10:00 am.
(coffee, juice and donuts provided)
Run Tan Win Ping
:)
Tan began by saying:
"Let me begin by answering all the political figures, including the Chairman of the Republican Party of Orange County, Scott Baugh, and their ridiculous call for my withdrawal. I am innocent, and there is no way in hell I am gonna withdraw. I'm not gonna quit this race, and I'm gonna win this race."
I used to live in Nguyen Ai Quoc, Vietnam. Therefore, I can't help but cheer for Mr. Tan to win.
Thanks for the reminder Ladycalif!
The audio of the news conference was posted here:
http://www.ocblog.net/ocblog/2006/10/audio_of_tan_ng.html
Unfortunately, they warn that it is unedited and the first 9 minutes are chatter. The wav file is also 20 MB! I didn't listen to it but am posting for anyone else that wants to try.
Thanks
Just call me : Operation Nag and Drag :-)
The initial application process is subject to readily available, fraudulent processes and verification at the polling place is essentially an honor system. The availability of a permanent absentee status, requiring only a request, is also a formula for gaming the system.
My hat is off to whomever wrote and directed the letter to voters and I'm sadly disappointed in the reaction of both political parties and the governor to the letter.
Until and unless candidate Nguyen is convicted of a crime, I urge voters to consider his suitability for office based on his viewpoints and his track record, not on any association with recent events in his district.
Loretta Sanchez has a public record of deceit and efforts to game our voting system to her advantage. Tan Nguyen does not.
thanks for the ping...I will listen in on monday.
Will Tan be on John and Ken's show?
From Tan Nguyen at press conference.
"I have learned that the letter in question was the Spanish translation of a letter in English urging green-card holders and illegal immigrants to not vote. What is wrong with that."From an attorney (Braniff) commenting on the letter on behalf of the campaign:"There is now some debate to what the Spanish translation really means, especially when it comes to the word 'emigrado'."
"I took a long walk last night along the beach and I met many hispanics. I asked about the word 'emigrado' and what it means. . . . it either means a person with a green card, or they are just here legally but they are not a citizen. This is also a term that is used by the U.S. Government's immigration services agents who would ask those who cross our borders whether they are a citizen or an "emigrado"--a person who is here legally but with only a greencard."
"... investigation has indicated that someone connected with Mr. Nguyen's campaign did draft a letter in English... that letter was given to a respectable Spanish translator... to translate into Spanish... with the Mexican idiom... "Braniff reading the "original English version of the draft" (saying he would limit himself to the relevant parts and not read it in its entirety..
You are receiving this letter because you recently registered to vote. If you are a citizen of the U.S., we encourage you to participate in the democratic process.Other tidbits:However, if you are here illegally, or are just a resident with a green-card, you should be advised that voting at any federal election is a crime.
Recent survey conducted by Public Opinion Strategies found:
Neck and neck with opponent Ms. SanchezRegarding Scott Baugh, OC GOP Chairman:
Leading by 13% among voters 100% sure that they will be casting ballots.
Didn't wait for results of investigationQuestions not answered:
Didn't call Nguyen to get his side of story
Why was the letter sent on forged letterhead of another group?A bad move, IMO:
Why did and LAPD officer pay for the letter?
Apologized to his office manager that he had discharged
Invited them to rejoin the campaign.With respect to his office manager, he said "her forwarding of the database without my knowledge was a mistake...." That seems to imply that she was not the author of the letter or the mastermind behind this effort. More facts to come, for sure!
If I was in early Rome, I would have gone to see the Christians being eaten."
-- Frank Barbaro, chairman of the OC Democratic Party, when asked why he joined the crowd watching Tan Nguyen's campaign office being raided by officials today.
That quote is a keeper. Says a lot.
(I posted it earlier, under his picture).
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1723642/posts?page=116#116
Thanks, could I get added to you ping list?
Tan Nguyen will be on the John & Ken Show Wednesday afternoon.
Why Is La Opinion Changing the Tan Nguyen Letter?
Posted by Gustavo Arellano under The Tan Nguyen "Immigrants Can't Vote" Letter
La Opinión is the dean of Americas Spanish-language dailies, dating back to the 1930s. Its owners, the Lozano family, are tireless advocates of Latinos, and the papers Pilar Marrero is one of Southern Californias best political reporters, damn the language.
But their coverage of the Tan Nguyen scandal (read previous Blotter posts below) is inconsistent when considering the infamous letters most infamous passagethat illegal immigrants and resident aliens cant vote. The Spanish-language letter states, Se le avisa que si su residencia en este país es ilegal o si es emigrado, votar en una eleción federal es un delito que podrá resultar en encarcelamientó, y sí sera deportado por votar sin tener derecho a ello (You are advised that if your residence in this country is illegal or you are a non-citizen immigrant, voting in a federal election is a crime that could result in jail time, and you will be deported for voting without having a right to do so.)
However, in this article, Opinión writer Araceli Martínez Ortega writes that the Nguyen letter says, Estás advertido que si tu residencia en este país es ilegal o eres un inmigrante, votar en una elección federal es un crimen que puede dar como resultado la cárcel. And in this second story, Martínez Ortega says the letter (sent to 14,000 Latinos in the 46th Congressional District) reads, Te advertimos que si tu residencia en este país es ilegal o si eres un inmigrante, votar en una elección federal es un crimen que puede resultar en cárcel. This article, however, has it right.
Were not going to translate the Martínez Ortegas two versions (mix-and-match with the original Spanish above!), cause it essentially translates word-for-word, sentiment for sentiment. Except for one wordinmigrante. Means immigrant, of course. But the original said emigrado.
So why the change? As reported earlier, emigrado refers to immigrants who are legal but not citizens; inmigrante refers to immigrants without distinction to legal status. The original letter tells readers non-citizens cant vote; La Opinións version spins it so that readers think even former immigrants who are now citizens cant vote.
You can excuse the English-language press for mistranslationwere just a bunch of gabachos y pochos, after all. But why would La Opinión change the content of Nguyens letter. Honest mistake (twice)or deliberate misdirection?
Here are the articles:
1. Araceli Martínez-Ortega, "Piden renunciar al candidato Nguyen," La Opinión, Viernes, 20 de octubre de 2006And here are the quotes, all reportedly directly from the campaign letter (again, the third is the language actually included in the letter):
2. Araceli Martínez-Ortega, "Catean oficina de Tan Nguyen," La Opinión, Sabado, 21 de octubre de 2006
3. Jorge Morales Almada, "Exigen ir a fondo," La Opinión, Sabado, 21 de octubre de 2006
1. "Te advertimos que si tu residencia en este país es ilegal o si eres un inmigrante, votar en una elección federal es un crimen que puede resultar en cárcel."2. "Estás advertido que si tu residencia en este país es ilegal o eres un inmigrante, votar en una elección federal es un crimen que puede dar como resultado la cárcel".
3. "Se le avisa que si su residencia en este país es ilegal o si es emigrado, votar en una elección federal es un delito que podrá resultar en encarcelamiento."
Ping. FYI.
And now for the "hypocrisy" category:
http://www.mexiconews.com.mx/21156.html
The Mexican government said Monday it will present the U.N. Human Rights Council with a resolution criticizing a U.S. plan to build hundreds of kilometers (miles) of additional fencing on the border. Mexican Ambassador Luis Alfonso de Alba, president of the 47-member council, said the resolution will denounce the fence for violating human rights and driving undocumented migrants to cross the border in more remote and dangerous areas. The United States is an observer but not a member of the council, which this year replaced the widely discredited U.N. Human Rights Commission. At the council´s first sessions this year, members failed to reach agreement on the most hotly debated issues, such as on human rights violations in Sudan. Last month, the U.S. Senate approved a bill to build 1,100 kilometers (700 miles) of border fencing. U.S. President George W. Bush has said he will sign it into law, despite pleas from the Mexican government for a veto. President Vicente Fox has called the plan "shameful" and compared it to the Berlin Wall. An estimated 11 million Mexicans live in the United States, about half them illegally.
Why don't WE file a complaint with the UN over Mexico's flagrantly anti-gringo immigration laws that lead to the poverty there of which they hypocritically complain? Their laws are detailed here:
http://www.directory.com.mx/immigration
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.