Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ON FOX NEWS NOW: WAR STORIES: IWO JIMA FLAG RAISERS
FOX NEWS ^ | 10/22/2006 | FOX NEWS

Posted on 10/22/2006 5:00:54 PM PDT by RaceBannon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: kilowhskey

There may be something here

http://www.rooseveltmyth.com


41 posted on 10/22/2006 5:45:24 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mware

No, I didnt stay for the credits! Really?


42 posted on 10/22/2006 5:46:04 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas
I have a lot of old WWII era songs

Ali,
do you have the Ship Fitter's Blues or I'm a cranky old crank in my clanky old tank, I've got the bay-do,bad-do all day Yokohama Blues ? (allegedly the world's longest song title)

just asking.....

43 posted on 10/22/2006 5:47:25 PM PDT by llevrok (Rummy! Let the Marines shoot back, damnit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Yes, as a matter of fact the photo they just showed of Iggy was one of the photos shown.


44 posted on 10/22/2006 5:48:45 PM PDT by mware (By all that you hold dear... on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: US Navy guy

I'll see the movie. I figure you know more than a film critic does.


45 posted on 10/22/2006 5:50:33 PM PDT by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

stick around after the movie during the credits that show actual photos of some of the marines that were portrayed in the movie. Not just the ones raising the flag.


46 posted on 10/22/2006 5:52:26 PM PDT by mware (By all that you hold dear... on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mware

Will do.


47 posted on 10/22/2006 5:53:05 PM PDT by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Of course the picture was posed, as a kind of photo op. So what. The men who raised the flag had been through a horrific battle and won. They had captured the top of the hill. So they did what victors always do, and raised the flag at the top. And then they did it again, for the camera.

The famous photo was not posed, although it was the second raising of the flag (replacement with the larger flag in the photo). The photographer did take another photo with a larger number of soldiers obviously posed, and when asked by his boss if the picture was posed, he said "yes"...but his boss was asking about the now famous photo, and the photographer thought he was talking about the posed photo that did not hit the headlines... Flags of Our Fathers the book, read it. Also watch FoX news, they have the real story.

48 posted on 10/22/2006 5:53:13 PM PDT by Enlightiator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mware
I am sure this has already been posted, but for anyone who hasn't seen it or sent a card, go here....

(Let's Say Thanks)

49 posted on 10/22/2006 5:58:30 PM PDT by Repub4bush (Tony is the Best Press Secretary Ever!!!!! (Sorry Ari, I liked you too, but you ain't Tony!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

Take PLENTY of Kleenexs. This was one movie that this old retired squid cried at. Stick around for the credits at the end, THESE ARE REAL TEAR JERKERS!


50 posted on 10/22/2006 5:59:03 PM PDT by US Navy guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
JAMES BRADLEY

My father helped raise the flag on Iwo Jima.
But he never talked about it.

Good read and photos

51 posted on 10/22/2006 6:01:06 PM PDT by Dubya (Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
What a terrific episode. I love the show and try to watch as often as I can. But tonight's episode was more touching than most.

World War II always brings thoughts of what my dad must have been dealing with (Sargent, 1st class, US Army) in both the Phillipines and later in Europe in early 1945. He has never spoken much of the war, other than a few repeated stories of the more enjoyable times. He carried the BAR, and reportedly used it to defend a troop truck while on duty in Europe - a story he never told until it was revealed by others.

I will see him at Thanksgiving and I will bring up the war one more time. His days are growing short, and his is a story that needs to be told. At least I think it does.

Sorry for the diversion. Iwo Jima is an amazing story, and Ollie North's narrative really touched me.

52 posted on 10/22/2006 6:04:36 PM PDT by meyer (A vote for amnesty is a vote against America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Fifty Years Later, Iwo Jima Photographer Fights His Own Battle

The Flag Raisers

53 posted on 10/22/2006 6:04:38 PM PDT by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Patriotic Fervor and the Truth About Iwo Jima

By Karal Ann Marling and John Wetenhal

3-04-02: Fact & Fiction

Patriotic Fervor and the Truth About Iwo Jima
By Karal Ann Marling and John Wetenhall
http://hnn.us/articles/599.html

Ms. Marling is professor of art history and American studies at the University of Minnesota. Mr. Wetenhall is executive director of the John and Mable Ringling Museum of Art.

Editor's Note: Because Iwo Jima has been in the news, we decided to republish this piece, which first appeared in The Chronicle of Higher Education in 1993.

IWO JIMA has a special place in our nation’s past. For many Americans it is a place where emotion merges with memory, where feeling and facts become one. It is a holy place in our civil religion, where emotions gather and linger--for generations. With our notes and books and claims of objectivity, we historians sometimes trespass--at our peril--upon this terrain where others have fought and died.

When we wrote about the commemoration of the World War II battle at Iwo Jima in Iwo Jima: Monuments, Memories, and the American Hero (Harvard University Press, 1991), we, as outside observers, became part of the process of remembering deeds of war. But quite unintentionally, we were dragged into a vortex of misremembering, as hearsay and emotion quickly subsumed the truth.

On February 23rd, 1945, the fifth day of the bloody battle of Iwo Jima, Marines were ordered to take Mount Suribachi, the besieged Japanese stronghold. A 40-man patrol ascended the volcanic slope, attained the summit, and hoisted "Old Glory" on a makeshift flagpole. That was at 10:35 a.m., precisely. Horns blew. Bells tolled. Cheers rang out from American positions below. "Mopping up" skirmishes followed, but, within an hour, the men of Easy Company had declared Suirbachi secure.

Early that afternoon, some combat photographers circumvented security outposts and climbed up to the restricted position. They arrived at the top just in time to witness, and photograph, an impromptu ceremony as the first, historic flag was exchanged for a larger one.

Within a week, the Associated Press spread AP photographer Joe Rosenthal's triumphant picture across front pages nationwide, accompanied by stirring headlines detailing the capture of Suribachi. The image captivated war-weary America and was rapturously compared with Delacroix's painting "Liberty Leading the People," with Leutze's "Washington Crossing the Delaware," even with Leonardo's "Last Supper."

In the course of the next few weeks, the story of the first flag merged with the photo of the second one. The original flag-raisers faded into anonymity while the country became obsessed with the identities of the faceless heroes in Rosenthal's picture. The aesthetic power of the photo seemed to demand a full and revised explanation of how it became to be taken. So history was rewritten--not by conspiracy, but through partial truths, omissions, overstatements, and poetic license. Before long, the gallant men in Rosenthal's photograph--by now a Pulitzer Prize-winning photograph--came to be considered the original heroes.

Our book simply retold the facts of the battle and sorted out the confusion that followed. We traced the evolving myth of Iwo Jima from John Wayne's Sands of Iwo Jima, through the booze-soaked martyrdom of flag-raiser Ira Hayes (the hapless last figure in the Rosenthal photograph), to the oversized colossus of the Marine Corps Memorial near Washington. We ended with the somber memories of the men who fought the battle and their poignant reflections on the tragedy of war. Why did this matter? The truth was important to the men who were there, many of whom complained to us that their deeds had been revised for the sake of public relations. In a larger sense, it was values such as truth and justice for which World War II was fought, not half-truths and orchestrated sentiment.

Yes, we thought we had this story nailed: we would set the popular misconceptions straight once and for all. What we couldn't foresee was that our book would embroil us in a tragi-comical farce, all in the name of patriotism or outright nostalgia.

Shortly after publication, our account was blindsided by Richard Harwood, The Washington Post's ombudsman, in a review in that newspaper that expressed outrage that we had dared to broach the very subject of the first flag-raising. He accused us of criticizing Rosenthal's photo as "phony" and the men in it as "imposters." But we never wrote this. In fact, we went to considerable lengths to prove that the photo was legitimate, the men reluctant heroes who consistently said they had not dodged bullets to raise the flag, but had simply replaced one flag with another. Mr. Harwood assumed the true story somehow undermined the valor of those who participated (it did not), and he set us up as straw men for a conspiracy theory--that the deception was planned--that the book overtly disproves.

A few weeks later, The New York Times took the same tack under the headline: "Birth of an Icon, but an Illegitimate One." The review attributed to us--again falsely--allegations that the Iwo Jima icon was "illegitimate, a fraud, a dark hoax unworthy of the men who died in that battle."

The review in The Times touched off a barrage of letters to the editor. G. Greely Wells, the oft-proclaimed "man who carried the flag" to the foot of Suribachi, got three columns of space in The Times's op-ed page to rebut our book--space he used to recount, with pristine accuracy, facts that he might have read on our Page 42. (Mr. Wells hadn't read the book. We called him the day that his column appeared and offered to send him one. He replied that he had ordered one, but that it had not yet arrived.)

Undeterred, Mr. Wells took his crusade to National Public Radio, where Alex Chadwick of "Morning Edition" announced to the nation's breakfast tables that we had pronounced the Iwo Jima photo "staged propaganda." Had he bothered to read the book, he might have seen the photo and caption on Page 79 that asserts the "spontaneity" of Rosenthal's picture.

MORE ANGRY LETTERS followed in The Times, and other newspapers picked up the story--often assembling their opinions from misstatements contained in the Post and Times reviews. The best came from the West Coast: a column by William Endicott in The Sacramento Bee titled "Can an Icon Sue for Libel?" Mr. Endicott blasted us as leftist revisionists and tried to bury our account by invoking his venerable father: "My dad watched from a troop transport as the flag was hoisted, and he never forgot the sight for as long as he lived."

But the great moment that Endicott senior remembered was not the one in the Rosenthal photograph. That moment occurred, that flag was raised at 10:35 A.M. Photographed by Louis Lowery of Leatherneck magazine, it is a forgotten footnote in history.

Once begun, distortions spread by the news media are almost impossible to correct. The New York Times rejected no fewer than three rebuttal letters from us. Editors called us twice to negotiate what they might print: 100 words without reference to any error in the Times review. In the end, even though they had printed six columns of misdirected attacks inspired by their inaccurate review, the newspaper editors refused to publish anything from us.

Ironically, our experience demonstrates precisely how the process of patriotic myth-making works. It isn't a conspiracy; it isn't orchestrated. It is a series of assumptions, a few leaps of faith. A reviewer who's too busy, complacent, or lazy to read carefully and check the facts. An editor too pompous to concede that the "Fourth Estate" might have gotten something wrong. Over time, a story is crafted out of scraps and innuendo. This was the very process that had led to the convolution of the Iwo Jima story in the first place--the very web of half truths and hearsay that we had worked so hard to untangle.

IN THE END, though, we were the ones who were wrong. We underestimated the patriotic fervor that we had so carefully chronicled. It is an overwhelming reverence for the heroic feeling of the Iwo Jima myth that still renders the facts of its birth--to some people, at least--irrelevant. Americans want desperately for the real-life story of the heroes of Mount Suribachi to turn out like the Duke's heart-rending martyrdom in Sands of Iwo Jima, when his last vision was the raising of Old Glory amidst a shower of enemy fire. The famous War Bond poster--"Now All Together"--made Rosenthal's image look so real that it had to be true. And the Marine Corps Memorial stands proudly as the last great vestige of monumental realism in American sculpture--big, commanding, more real that reality. In the noble cause of celebrating our nation's reverence for truth and justice, Americans prefer to let reality slip by, to ignore inconvenient facts.

But Americans' yearning goes deeper than a willingness to believe Hollywood formula and fantasy. It involves the preservation of a passionate faith in the hero, a belief in the individual's ability to change the course of history (the valor of Delacroix's flag-waving "Liberty" and the resolve of Leutze's "Washington"), a faith now so distressingly contradicted by the 58,180 names on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.

We discovered an unusual phenomenon in the course of our research: the fake flag-raisers, people who insisted they had been in Rosenthal's picture and had helped hoist the Stars and Stripes over Iwo Jima. There were, and are, a lot of them.

Some Iwo vet, probably a fine Marine, spins a few Pacific yarns in a local tavern. Over the course of years, his story takes him from the D-Day landing, to the base of Suribachi, and on up its sulfurous slopes, until one unfortunate evening, he tells how he grabbed a length of metal pipe and helped his buddies hoist Old Glory in the Pacific breeze. Before he knows it, somebody at the next table tips off a reporter. An interview. A picture. A story in the hometown newspaper. Then the wire services. Another hero. And for the rest of his life, this unlucky hero will have to go on spinning his yarn to sustain his newfound glory.

And so what difference is there between getting caught up in a good story and creating a national myth?

Hardly any.

This piece first ran in The Chronicle of Higher Education, September 26, 1993, and is reprinted with permission.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Remember That Flag On Iwo!
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/dickg/flagwtc.html
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/dickg/flagwtc.html




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CONTACT:
GyG1345@yahoo.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please Forward!
Want On GyG's E-Mail List?
Send: GunnyG@GMail.com
ADD In Subject Line....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RESTORE THE REPUBLIC!
R.W. "Dick" Gaines
(The Original "Gunny G")
GnySgt USMC (Ret.)
1952- (Plt #437, PISC)-'72
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

GyG's....GLOBE & ANCHOR
Sites/Forums....
~~~~~~~~~~
For... The Thinking Marine!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The GyG Archive/Bookmarks @FURL
GyG's History/Traditions, Etc.
GyG's Globe and Anchor! --Sites & Forums
GyG's Old Salt Marines Tavern ~Interactive~
GyG's Globe and Anchor Weblog

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
USMC, History, Politically Incorrect,
Unusual/Controversial, News-n-Views, etc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


54 posted on 10/22/2006 6:13:52 PM PDT by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC; 2nd Bn, 11th Mar; 68 grunt; A.A. Cunningham; ASOC; AirForceBrat23; Ajnin; AlaskaErik; ...

BUMP! AND A PING!


55 posted on 10/22/2006 6:19:10 PM PDT by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freema

Thanks for the ping Ma...


56 posted on 10/22/2006 6:23:45 PM PDT by NYleatherneck (It ain't a World War until the French surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: NYleatherneck; RaceBannon

Wait 'til you see Race's Ma at Post #3!


57 posted on 10/22/2006 6:27:52 PM PDT by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

The correct title to that Hoagy Carmichael tune is "I'm a Cranky Old Yank in a Clanky Old Tank on the Streets of Yokohama with my Honolulu Mama doin' those Beat-O Beat-O, Flat On My Feet-O Hirohito Blues."


58 posted on 10/22/2006 6:29:40 PM PDT by kilowhskey (Land of the free, because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kilowhskey
The correct title to that Hoagy Carmichael tune ....

Thanks. I've always heard parts of the title over the years. Now I know the skinny. It's worse - or better - than I expected! :-)

59 posted on 10/22/2006 6:43:13 PM PDT by llevrok (Rummy! Let the Marines shoot back, damnit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: freema; RaceBannon

Just returned from seeing Flags of Our Fathers movie. I preferred the book. Movies sometime really take away from the real story, though this movie did show how these guys were paraded around like objects.


60 posted on 10/22/2006 7:08:26 PM PDT by Chieftain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson