To: atlaw
My point? I don't know, maybe that David Barton is a less than reliable source? That the "Christian Nation" project is a bunch of hooey? That you presented as authoritative a collection of cites from David Barton without including David Barton's own retraction of the phony quotes he fobbed off in his prior claims? That not much is left of David Barton's credibility? You choose. None of this actually seems to be substantiated by the link. Were all (or most) of his original quotes unsupported?
41 posted on
10/24/2006 12:20:54 PM PDT by
KayEyeDoubleDee
(const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Yes. Another interesting discussion of Mr. Barton's dubious historical revisionism can be found here:
http://www.bjcpa.org/resources/pubs/pub_walker_barton.htm
The list of quotes that Mr. Barton concedes to be either false or questionable is found at the bottom of the article, at sec. 11.
42 posted on
10/24/2006 1:17:26 PM PDT by
atlaw
To: KayEyeDoubleDee
45 posted on
10/24/2006 3:50:25 PM PDT by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson