For some reason, you left out David Barton's (rather mealy-mouthed) retraction of the phony "founding fathers" quotes that he previously cited as factual.
http://www.wallbuilders.com/resources/search/detail.php?ResourceID=20
Your point? Feel better?
I have found your link, but I would not characterize it as "mealy-mouthed." And I don't understand how you can do so. Barton sought to raise the academic standard, not weasel out of a position previously held.