Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: California Patriot

She had nothing to lose in the debate. Its' broadcasting was so limited, it's like it never happened.


144 posted on 10/22/2006 7:36:56 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

The moderator rattled off a long list of stations or networks which were going to cover the debate (I don't think he included C-SPAN). I don't know what percentage of the voters were able to watch it but I would suspect most of them could.


146 posted on 10/22/2006 9:37:22 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Yes, but word will get out to a few people that she didn't do well. Knowledgeable people in both parties saw, or will hear, that she didn't do well. And that will encourage a few Republicans and disappoint a few Democrats. In politics, every little bit counts. You never know when such things will end up having an impact. Obviously the Shrew will win this year, and she'll win by a big margin. But a bad debate performance could, if nothing else, impact her presidential race later by impacting how some of the insiders see her.


151 posted on 10/22/2006 12:25:05 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson