[jaime1959]

> With Pelosi as 3rd in line to the POTUS, don't think some BDS loonies won't be thinking how cool it would be to take out Bush & Cheney in some kind of dual assassination plot. <

Get a freaking grip.

[alnick]

Wow. Like it or not, there are a LOT of insane people running around out there with severe cases of Bush Derangement Syndrome. Remember the movie that's about to come out, "Death of a President" that depicts the murder of GWB in 2007? This is their fantasy. You also seem to have forgotten that there are terrorists out there who would dearly love to murder this president. And they are willing to die trying. And they've already proven they're willing to do the unthinkable. We underestimate them at our own peril.

We're living in extremely dangerous times, and the Democrats are a huge part of the problem. Given the chance, they'll get us all killed.

[ChildOfThe60s]

> With Pelosi as 3rd in line to the POTUS, don't think some BDS loonies won't be thinking how cool it would be to take out Bush & Cheney in some kind of dual assassination plot. <

Get a freaking grip.

I have a grip. I don't actually think it would happen. Or that it would even be attempted. But I double damn guarantee ya there are more than a couple of leftie loonies that would fantasize about it.
Keep in mind that I'm talking about the same clowns that think I should be put on trial for not believing in global warming. That Bush blew up the twin towers & murdered 3,000 people. These are not stable, rational people. Some have already publicly advocated the assasination of Bush.

Do these people have the guts to do it? Who knows? I doubt it. But don't kid yourself. There are a scary number of them that would be more than happy to see it happen.

[Gaffer]

What you propose is dangerous, reckless, and illogical. If the House is controled by Democrats, no expiring tax cut legislation will be renewed. Defense? Financially, the President proposes, and the House disposes. Simply put, even if GW puts a budget forth with enough for defense, the controling party in the HOUSE doesn't have to enact it. Deadlock? Yes, it is and all the while, the military languishes under CRs (in case you don't know what that is, they are "continuing resolutions" that are subsistence allocations. IOW, nothing new, innovative or that can turn the tides in IRAQ.

Couple the financially crippling inaction (or absurd action by the HOUSE that forces GW to veto) with never-ending investigations, panels and hearings in the HOUSE over GW's impending impeachment, you have a serious impediment to the business of killing our enemies, Muslim terrorists. If you still think this is a good strategy, then you, sir, are a complete fool....