You asserted that tag was banned at this school because "competative games were bad" in responce to a posters honest inquiry. According to the school it was banned because of the fear of injuries and potential lawsuits. Your response was just dishonest. Banning tag is idiotic, but how can we have an intellegent discussion on the merits of the case when we cann't even present the facts accurately or honestly?
"Your response was just dishonest."
My reply was an honest assessment. To the excessively literal, who take representatives of the educational establishment at their word, without question, perhaps this is offensive somehow. However, there is a track record going on thirty years of viewing competition as "bad," so this is at the root of the issue, all deflection aside.