Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Kim Has No Plans for Second Nuclear Test, Regrets First Test
FOX NEWS ^ | Friday, October 20, 2006 | AP

Posted on 10/20/2006 5:08:47 AM PDT by psychopuppy

BEIJING — North Korean leader Kim Jong-il told a visiting Chinese delegation that the communist nation didn't plan to conduct additional nuclear tests, a news report said Friday.

Kim told Chinese envoy Tang Jiaxuan that "we have no plans for additional nuclear tests," Yonhap news agency reported, citing an unnamed diplomatic source in Beijing.

Kim also expressed regret about his country's nuclear test to the delegation and said Pyongyang would return to nuclear talks if Washington backs off from its financial sanctions, a South Korean newspaper reported Friday.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: axis; brix; nodong; ronery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last
To: carton253

Cue the music....rorry oh ro rorry.


Take the mad man out.


81 posted on 10/20/2006 9:35:57 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: psychopuppy
He's lying.
82 posted on 10/20/2006 9:38:24 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (Religion of peace my arse - We need a maintenance Crusade - piss on islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Who is to say that Kim doesn't have that at his disposal?

He does not...........Yet.... He has the same plans and info that the AQ Kahn network sold to Lebanon, Iraq and Iran, and this came from Pakistan research and development.

Knowing is a far cry from implementation, and this is what the test was about.

What is distorting this picture, is the Clinton claim that they shut the NK nuke project down for eight years, but all they did was freeze the access to plutonium, which NK did not need anyway, until they had further progressed in their research and development. When they were ready for the plutonium, they ditched the agreement, and withdrew from the proliferation treaty. They never stopped the program at all.

Now we come to this test, and it is becoming obvious that the test did not work as planned. They need this test to be successful so they can complete the package by creating a complete device that Iran can use to jump miles ahead from where they are now in tech, as they develop their infrastructure to reverse engineer the device and make plenty more.. They then need to work on the miniaturization to put it on their missiles but that is not something we can wait for, as they can deliver the package in many other ways, including a truck or barge to Israel or where ever.

The test did teach them a few things, and the next would likely be successful, or the next. They would then be very close to a working hydrogen bomb capable of mass destruction on a huge scale. This is what Iran wants, and why it is likely they are funding all of this.

You apparently misread what I was trying to say to the other poster. I was not discounting the test. I was only discounting the idea that it was plutonium based. They don't need to test that part, they need to test the initiator. The yield from the test apparently was way off, and that is not surprising. The next test, or the one after that, will likely succeed, and away we go!

Not with NK, but with Iran. They are the ones who need this bomb and they are quite willing to pay NK through the nose for it, no doubt. NK is just a service provider. As I read this situation.

83 posted on 10/20/2006 9:38:49 AM PDT by Cold Heat (I just analyze it, I did not create the mess...so go pound sand:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Arcy
... point out that the approach the administration has taken thus far is a fruitful...

Unlike his predecessor, President Bush does not take Kim Jong Il at his word.
84 posted on 10/20/2006 10:04:11 AM PDT by msnimje (Democratic Leftists are nothing like LIBERAL. They are intolerant and intellectual cowards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Agreed!


85 posted on 10/20/2006 10:08:42 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Our troops will send all of the worlds terrorists to hell in a handbasket with no virgins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DAC21

Methinks the Chinese envoy told Kim somthing like this....

We need American dollars more than we need Korean nukes. Stop this nonsense, or China will cut off your funds and start paying the N Korean generals directly. And, if you get the jones to do another nuke test, we will oblige you...and you will be the official bomb-holder....

China has this one under control. Now the US needs to take care of Iran...


86 posted on 10/20/2006 10:08:53 AM PDT by seeker_two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: LZ_Bayonet
Perhaps. But given our countries recent track record in sticking it out in a fight I wouldn't count on any defense from the United States. Especially given the RATS 5 th column activities. If I was Japan, Taiwan, or South Korea I would be getting my nucs ready to go. United Stated defending them, don't count on it.
87 posted on 10/20/2006 10:14:30 AM PDT by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

I don't mock you. You are absolutely correct.


88 posted on 10/20/2006 10:18:34 AM PDT by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: psychopuppy
Lemme see... China told us that North Korea told them something... That's rather like: one liar told us that another liar promised him something. And we're going to believe whom exactly? Both liars?

I certainly hope China laid down the law to lil' Kim, but I'm not going to get those hopes up too high.

89 posted on 10/20/2006 10:33:48 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Well, I'm going to disagree with because I don't believe that the tyrant is not in charge.


90 posted on 10/20/2006 10:38:15 AM PDT by carton253 (Sadness is just another word for not enough chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: psychopuppy

Well, OK, as long as he's sorry.


91 posted on 10/20/2006 11:03:14 AM PDT by Buck W. (If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

"For decades I have been saying that China and Russia will join forces against the US. Everyone always mocks me but I believe it firmly.
Our enemies will have help from their fellow travellers here in the US who hate this country with a passion."

And if either North Korea or Iran provides nuclear material to Al Queda we must hold China and Russia accountable. If a nuke is used on our cities coming from either source, we must nuke a Chinese or Russian city. Otherwise, we will be attacked again and again this way until we are easy prey.


92 posted on 10/20/2006 11:29:18 AM PDT by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

"I don't believe a word of what Kim Jong Idiot has to say. The only thing this freak needs is a .50-cal round to the head. As for his "nuclear" test, it was pretty much a fizzle and he used most of his plutonium to do it."

I wouldn't be too sure on that one. We all know his plutonium source is limited but I don't think you need a larger amount of plutonium/yield to know your nuclear technology will cause the fission needed for detonated. An expert here reading this may shed more light into this issue.


93 posted on 10/20/2006 11:32:15 AM PDT by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: quantfive
If a nuke is used on our cities coming from either source, we must nuke a Chinese or Russian city. Otherwise, we will be attacked again and again this way until we are easy prey.

You are quoting the policy of M.A.D.

It is our current policy, and the response will be tailored accordingly. Any attack response to any continent, automatically gets the rest involved. It's accepted policy, and this is why it works.

94 posted on 10/20/2006 11:35:36 AM PDT by Cold Heat (I just analyze it, I did not create the mess...so go pound sand:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: psychopuppy

China is getting a little antsy about Japan re-arming.


95 posted on 10/20/2006 11:37:36 AM PDT by BJClinton (Celebrate diversity: re-elect Congressman Foley!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: psychopuppy
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
96 posted on 10/20/2006 11:39:34 AM PDT by b4its2late (I'm not insensitive, I just don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steveegg

"Divide your timetable by 10 and you've got it."

I believe you are right, we are 5-7 years away from the next great world war. It takes real time to build a technology saavy military with modern combined arms tactics. Add to that China and Russia having to conduct more shared exercises with the new equipment/tactics. They are close but not there yet in my opinion. Both countries economically have the means to easliy continue this effort and grow their militaries into something scary.

When the crap does hit the fan, I won't be surprised to see at least one if not 2-3 weapons on NYC/LA & Chicago. This would instantly destroy our economy. We would figure out who was responsible and retaliate but I would expect Russia and China (along with Iran and North Korea) to make it's moves within the first three months of this attack. This would include an all out nuclear attack by the above mentioned countries. I was reading an article here a couple months ago about China building underground facilities similar to Russia's underground cities/complexes. The bummer for us in this scenerio is Russia has her own energy source and we don't. I believe we will win long-term but it's certainly an Armeggedon type scenerio in-between.


97 posted on 10/20/2006 11:43:02 AM PDT by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: quantfive
I believe we will win long-term but it's certainly an Armeggedon type scenerio in-between.>/I>

Ummmmmmm.....I beg to differ, but the reality is that nobody wins.

98 posted on 10/20/2006 11:45:41 AM PDT by Cold Heat (I just analyze it, I did not create the mess...so go pound sand:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

"The Chinese must have threatened to take away his basketball."

More like a personal message from China's POTUS delivered a few days ago. I am sure the message said " the timing is not right, cut the crap or we cut off food aid." The regime would collapse in 3 months if that happened.


99 posted on 10/20/2006 11:45:53 AM PDT by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SelectiveJNJ

"You know how I'd end this...I'd take 1000 of our 20,000 or so nukes...put 250 on the Island of Japan, 250 in South Korea, 250 on the Island of Taiwan, and 250 in Georgia (the country not the state for those of you in Rio-linda). Then I would send a letter to the ChiChoms, Putin, and "Little Kim" with nothing but a smiley face in front of a nuclear explosion - "Have a nice day!" "

We should begin production of mass nuclear weapon development and tell the world. Let Russia and China burn it's resources on keeping up like during the Cold War instead of having the resources to wage war by proxy and cause more problems.


100 posted on 10/20/2006 11:47:37 AM PDT by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson