Sloppy sentence. My bad.
The intent was not to provide a comprehensive overview of statistical mechanics, merely an introduction to the relation of entropy to statistical mechanics.
Are we assuming no internal degrees of freedom (monatomic gases)? The author is merely assuming "air" and adds that it is a 'simple' example. While some elements of air are monatomic (ex noble gases), the other elements (obviously more) are diatomic elements hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen etc...
"Entropy is a relationship between macroscopic and microscopic quantities. To illustrate what I mean by that statement I'm going to consider a simple example, namely a sealed room full of air. A full, microscopic description of the state of the room at any given time would include the position and velocity of every air molecule in it."
Wikipedia provides the example of a classical ideal diatomic gas.....
Do you happen to remember the term "partition function"? The partition function is still a statement of probability that a system occupies or does not occupy a particular microstate
Thermodynamics can be used to describe the probability of a certain arrangements of entities compared to another, and which general direction those arrangments are most likely to move in without interference. While the definition of orderly is vague, it is clear there are orderly arrangments which we observe which it is absurd to assume that a natural process organized them. "a forest where all of the trees were equally spaced, you would probably conclude that the forest was man-made" or "leaves laid out in perfectly straight rows or in one neat pile. We can express the results of such observations by saying that a disorderly arrangement is much more probable then an orderly one if the laws of nature are allowed to act without interference." from the
3rd edition of this book (The edition I own)
There is an Organizer outside of nature who interfered when the world was created.
The author is merely assuming "air" and adds that it is a 'simple' example. While some elements of air are monatomic (ex noble gases), the other elements (obviously more) are diatomic elements hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen etc... Sigh. Have you ever heard of quantum mechanics, and quantization of rotation or vibration of polyatomic molecules?
There are partition functions to describe the relative populations of molecules in the various internal states, too.
This is important because the molecules can exchange energy with one another (including changing their translational kinetic energy) upon collisions.
In other words, stating merely the velocity and positions of the molecules is not enough to specify the exact state of the system precisely. Only to a certain degree of approximation...which is why I mentioned monatomic gases.
Thermodynamics can be used to describe the probability of a certain arrangements of entities compared to another, and which general direction those arrangments are most likely to move in without interference.
In particular, the assumption is made of so-called "equal a priori probabilities". That is, all of the microstates are assumed to be "equally likely"--energetic considerations excluded. Then for each different macrostate, there is some set of microstates which gives rise to that macrostate. The idea being that the macrostates which have the largest number of contributing microstates yada yada. There is an analogy to the combinatorics of arriving at a given total when rolling a pair of dice, but on a much larger scale.
There is an Organizer outside of nature who interfered when the world was created.
I agree completely, but the sentence seems like a non-sequitur given the rest of your post. For the nonce, what is problematical is that the physical evidence which we have of the Earth and the cosmos does not match what we would expect from things, *if* the Creator made them in the way some folks interpret Genesis, *and* if we assume that the laws of nature (including physics, chemistry, etc.) have remained in operation in their present form from the word GO.
Cheers!