Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lamont Aims to Widen Pitch in Conn. Race
AP ^ | 10/19/6 | ANDREW MIGA

Posted on 10/19/2006 11:28:49 AM PDT by SmithL

A single towering issue — Iraq — powered Ned Lamont in his dramatic primary victory over Democratic Sen. Joe Lieberman. Now Lamont is letting voters know he's got more to talk about than that, because Iraq alone isn't doing it for him in the fall campaign.

Lamont is ticking off plans for expanded health care, universal preschool education and curbs in the influence of lobbyists. He's decrying U.S. addiction to foreign oil. To be sure, Iraq is no more settled than when he tapped the anger of so many Democrats over the war's course, securing the Democratic place on the ticket from an 18-year veteran who almost became vice president.

But Lamont's post-primary glow has faded and he trails Lieberman, who is running as an independent in a state with a vast pool of independent, if Democratic-leaning, voters.

And when he stood in a college lecture hall in the old mill town of Willimantic, the war he wanted to talk about is the one he thinks should be declared on American reliance on foreign oil.

"It's dangerous to be buying billions of dollars of oil from a region of the world that's mired in conflict," Lamont said as he rolled out a plan for energy independence.

Two months ago, the multimillionaire businessman became a rising star with his insurgency against Lieberman, a moderate Democrat who dug in his heels in supporting the war even when other Democrats peeled away.

"He was a national celebrity," Gary Rose, a politics professor at Sacred Heart University in Fairfield, said of Lamont. "But after he won his primary, it seemed like he became the invisible man for a while. Something was lost there."

Lamont trails Lieberman by 8 percentage points in the latest poll.

"His numbers seem to be frozen right now,"...

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: lament; lamont

1 posted on 10/19/2006 11:28:50 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Maybe Lament can use the "Dump Nixon" platform. I'm pretty sure California's Phil Angelides is finished with it.


2 posted on 10/19/2006 11:29:18 AM PDT by SmithL (Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Lamont and Lieberman. Extreme leftist loons. I can't wait to be able listen to the radio without those ads.


3 posted on 10/19/2006 11:38:18 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Look up Lamont's wealthy forbears Thomas Lamont and Corliss Lamont on wikipedia or some more reputable encyclopedia some time.

These Lamonts have done real damage over the last century. Ned Lamont's great-grandfather was a big supporter of Italian fascism and helped bankroll Mussolini. This is not a matter of vague rumour. It is not circumstantial, like serving on the board of a bank that did business with some bad German company before WWII. This is big time boosterism in an open and proud way.

Great-uncle Corliss Lamont was a major American communist.

4 posted on 10/19/2006 12:13:58 PM PDT by Montfort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Ned can broaden his message to ensure voters know that he will be finaancially OK after he has taxed the rest of us out of existance. I am sure that concern for his wealth maintenance has helpd some voters back. And if it became tight Harry Reid can let him on an off-the-books land deal or two. That might reassure CT voters and broaden his base-of advocacy--not.


5 posted on 10/19/2006 1:21:13 PM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
not from that state but if i was i don't know who i would vote for. vote repub or independent. i don't think the repubbie has a chance and i would not want the rat to win. how would you all vote???
6 posted on 10/19/2006 1:26:05 PM PDT by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camas

I'm not from CT, but if I was, I'd have to vote for Lieberman.

The Republican has no chance. Voting for him is a wasted vote.

However, Lieberman was abandoned by the Donkeys. They gave money and open support to Lamont, especially after Lamont took the nomination.

The Donkeys also promised to erase his seniority if he ran as an independent.

I have a hunch that Lieberman may not be as gung-ho for the Donkey caucus as he used to be.

It remains to be seen with whom he will caucus, after all is said and done.


7 posted on 10/19/2006 2:29:54 PM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
thanks for the reply. i agree, i wonder how the FReepers in CT will vote
8 posted on 10/19/2006 3:06:57 PM PDT by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Montfort
I don't know where you dug that up, kudos to you. Ping O'Reilly!

This just proves to me that FR is filled with ex-investigative reporters...you're outed, darling.. ~Pray

9 posted on 10/19/2006 5:00:16 PM PDT by pray4liberty (School District horrors: http://totallyunjust.tripod.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: camas; Westbrook
I live in Connecticut... I, my husband, some friends and family members and some FReepers are all holding our noses and voting for Joe Lieberman. It pains me to do it, but the GOP candidate - Alan Schlesinger - simply isn't viable and the margin between Lieberman and Lamont has been steadily tightening over the past few weeks.

If the candidates were only Lieberman and the GOP candidate (and the usual Green Party and "other" types), I assure you I would vote for the GOP candidate, just as I have always done over the years.

10 posted on 10/19/2006 11:46:14 PM PDT by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...

Connecticut ping!

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.

11 posted on 10/19/2006 11:46:44 PM PDT by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg; All

The enemy you know is better than the one which is unknown. Joe may require holding one's nose while voting, but the alternative is to watch Connecticut be flushed down a toilet, along with the rest of the country if the dems obtain power in congress. Maybe in the next election the Repubs can field a viable candidate.


12 posted on 10/19/2006 11:51:41 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier fighting in Mahmudiyah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I keep getting these annoyingflyers from Neddie. Guess it's cause I registered as an Independent back in college and just never got around to changing it to an R

I'm about to call up the Lamont headquarters and complain. Been thinnking that I should go the green route," how dare you cut down trees to send me this" line.


13 posted on 10/20/2006 5:16:50 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
When the choices are so-so, lunatic and a no-hoper, go for so-so.

Regards, Ivan

14 posted on 10/20/2006 5:18:21 AM PDT by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
When the choices are so-so, lunatic and a no-hoper, go for so-so.

I'm afraid those are our sad choices this year, Ivan. The devil you know is better than the RED devil you don't know...

Any other year, there is no question... I would vote for the GOP candidate.

15 posted on 10/20/2006 9:56:54 AM PDT by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
The enemy you know is better than the one which is unknown. Joe may require holding one's nose while voting, but the alternative is to watch Connecticut be flushed down a toilet, along with the rest of the country if the dems obtain power in congress. Maybe in the next election the Repubs can field a viable candidate.

Great post. Unfortunately that's the way it is in Connecticut right now.

God bless and a big THANK YOU to you and your son, by the way! :o)

16 posted on 10/20/2006 9:59:09 AM PDT by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Thank you for your kind comments regarding my son. I will pass them along to him the next time he calls.


17 posted on 10/20/2006 11:04:55 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier fighting in Mahmudiyah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson