Posted on 10/19/2006 11:03:05 AM PDT by Res Nullius
I was just wondering the same thing; since when did "budget concerns" have anything at all to do with whether the people have the right to assemble and speak their piece?
Basically what they are saying is if anybody objects to your being there they can deny your right because it might cost too much?
I don't think so.
I don't need a permit if I have a gathering on my property.
Some places you do. Being a political gathering as opposed to a family gathering.
Yes, they can deny you the use of their facilities if it would risk busting the municipal budget.
"It's a double-edged sword. If we allow them to meet and someone gets hurt, we'll be blamed. And if we don't let them meet, people will say we're discriminating against them,"
So it seems you choose to discriminate against the Minute Men in favor of the Protestors.
Careful with the P.A./music/noise ordnances -- just meet in the park or in front of city hall...
Mayhaps they weill see it is better to permit them to meet inside in public spaces...
If they go nazi... and try to forbid the peaceable assembly.. and/or the redress of grievances...
Cry havoc ---> loose the dogs of courtroom drama...
IMHO
No, we'll say you're too chicken-sh** to stand up to mobs that seek to stifle basic Constitutional rights of the Minutemen to peaceably assemble.
Try thinking through this a bit.
Because the Minutemen are threatened unlawfully, the town will not allow them to meet. What kind of message does that send?
Be MORE violent next time and you'll REALLY be able to stifle your opposition. That is why the town needs to stand up to the thugs, and call in help from the State Police if needed to arrest the thugs.
Then call in the State Police to stand up to criminal intimidation. Or else we'll just get more if it by rewarding it.
Bump.
No, FREEDOM OF PEACEABLE ASSEMBLY is protected by our Constitution. And your goons are trying to prevent such. Which is not a right, BUT A CRIME.
The State of Washington needs to crack down on this.
Problem: the municipality must then compensate the state government for the cost of the State Police coverage. The cost is still there. The usual rule of thumb is that the group requesting the facility covers the additional costs incurred, whatever their nature or their cause.
Then the city should have thought about that before building a PUBLIC convention center with PUBLIC funds.
That's the last thing we need now. Whatever one's views might be on illegal immigration and the Minutemen, rewarding left-wing thug behavior by denying them a permit will only engender a lot more left-wing thug behavior.
Civic Center
This building is used for meetings, dances, and other activities. It can be rented and used by anyone. It has a kitchen and eating area too.
http://www.selah.k12.wa.us/PartnerLink97/AnsteyH/recreation.html
Funny, I don't recall the Klan getting billed for the police costs of one of their marches.
A critical role of government is to enforce basic Constitutional provisions. At all levels. Kowtowing to thugs is a gross abdication of such, and only encourages more of such. And that is the case no matter what you might feel about the Minutemen.
That's a fairly idiotic argument.
The general rule of thumb is that if your event is likely to impose large unplanned costs on the municipality in question, your organization gets to cover those costs. Always has been, always will be.
She said, checking the shine on her jack boots in the mirror.
And you would know the detailed bits and pieces of the Klan's budget because . . . ?
They get billed, at least around here. I once pulled overtime to protect Tommy Metzger's fat a$$ when he lived in Fallbrook and had a march down in San Diego. Yes, the KKK covered the costs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.