Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CommerceComet

Part of the reason it was the "best selling car" was because it was stupendously cheap and lots of rental car companies and fleets bought them, even though they were horrible POS.

If you remove the fleet sales, Taurus was only a top seller for a couple of years after introduction - which is why Ford stopped breaking down sales into fleet and normal, to make their numbers look better.


249 posted on 10/20/2006 12:57:56 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr
Hi Spktyr-

I don't believe a fleet manager or rental car buyer would seek cars with a known poor reliability record because the price was right. Breakdowns are an enormous drain on profits for a rental car company since they also degrade goodwill. The last thing they want is an angry customer stranded at the side of the road.

~ Blue Jays ~

250 posted on 10/20/2006 1:15:53 PM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr

Given that Ford has a very successful 20-year run with the Taurus, had years of favorable reviews, and set the standard for mid-sized sedans for years, I'm sure that all manufacturers would have loved to have made the Taurus. An opinion of "horrible POS" flies in the face of available evidence.

I sure that every manufacturer in the world would love to make a car you would deem a "horrible POS" if it would be a successful as the Taurus. I don't think that they would care one iota that you didn't like it or wouldn't drive it.


257 posted on 10/20/2006 2:26:16 PM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson