Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP sources: Newt moves to become the Republicans' savior in ‘08
Insight n the News ^ | 10/17/2006

Posted on 10/18/2006 10:25:32 AM PDT by rob777

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has quietly positioned himself for a comeback to head the Republican Party as early as 2008.

GOP sources said Mr. Gingrich does not plan to run for president, but intends to be available as the savior of conservatives dismayed by candidates who seek to move the party to the left in the aftermath of George W. Bush’s presidency. Over the last few months, Mr. Gingrich has become the favorite of conservatives and has outlined a new vision for the GOP that seeks for the party to return to the moral clarity of the late President Ronald Reagan.

“I believe that whatever the results of the November elections, Newt will become a major force in the GOP for 2008," a senior Republican Party strategist said.

Mr. Gingrich has already become the choice of conservatives and the Christian Right. He has won the Human Events presidential straw poll for September, topping the list for the second month in a row.

The achievement marked a major boost for Mr. Gingrich. For much of 2006, Mr. Gingrich trailed Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican, in the poll, but last month Mr. Gingrich led the House member by 31 to 17 percent.

Among conservatives, Mr. Gingrich is more popular than senior allies of President Bush and members of his administration. In the Human Events poll, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice dropped to sixth place with 6.68 percent. Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, the president's younger brother, reached 3.37 percent in the presidential straw poll.

GOP sources said Mr. Gingrich decided to raise his profile in 2006, with the publication of a weekly newsletter and the gathering of a brain trust. Over the last few months, he has been campaigning for Republican candidates and commenting on both domestic and foreign issues.

On several issues, Mr. Gingrich has taken positions that differ with that of the administration. While Mr. Bush has urged diplomacy to deal with a nuclear North Korea, Mr. Gingrich has been calling for regime change that echoed the Reagan era and the president's efforts with then-British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and the late Pope John Paul II to undermine the communist regimes in Eastern Europe.

"When you look at a country such as North Korea, you see tremendous poverty," Mr. Gingrich said in a radio interview last week. "You have to believe that there are thousands of people who might want to collaborate with the West. We're remarkably bureaucratic. Rather than work with the North Korean government, we ought to be cooperating with those willing to smuggle food into the country. We have to recognize what a bad dictatorship this is."

GOP sources said Mr. Gingrich will most likely not run for president in 2008. But they said he would seek to represent the conservative wing of the party, the endorsement of which would be regarded as crucial for any GOP nominee.

"It's obvious that in 2008, the party will move away from the Bush era and will be looking for a change in direction," another GOP source said. "I think Newt will be in a position to lay out a strategy that would appeal to both conservatives and old-line Republicans."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: newt; newtgingrich; ohyes; uhhhhhhhidontthinkso
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-130 next last
To: jamese777

and before reagan, it never had one who was divorced.


61 posted on 10/18/2006 11:17:41 AM PDT by PDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
Look, I'm not saying that Newt is even close to as bad as the others you list. But with the MSM all it takes is to have an allegation for them to drumbeat to death against a Republican, and they will do it. I simply point to the ongoing Mark Foley affair to prove my point. Yes, Newt is a valuable asset, in the same sense that Rove is a valuable asset. He is no longer valuable as a candidate.
62 posted on 10/18/2006 11:18:39 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: dollar_dog

she passed away several years ago.


63 posted on 10/18/2006 11:18:48 AM PDT by PDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rob777

Newt Gingrich/ben Stein in 2008


64 posted on 10/18/2006 11:19:45 AM PDT by Lewite (Praise YAHWEH and Proclaim His Wonderful Name! Islam, the end time Beast-the harlot of Babylon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

"The US has never had a President who was married three times."

Especially when two of the marriages were to the aides he was cheating on the previous wife with.

A man who will cheat on his wife will cheat you too. I don't trust cheaters.


65 posted on 10/18/2006 11:22:12 AM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Well, if he runs, you won't have any choice. It will be the main thing written about him.


66 posted on 10/18/2006 11:24:41 AM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy

"Are you referring to girl #1 or girl #2, since he is now on his third wife.

"

Doesn't matter. He cheated on #1 with #2. Then he cheated on #2 with #3. He's a serial adulterer.


67 posted on 10/18/2006 11:26:33 AM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: All

If a scientist found the cure for cancer, but was divorced 3 times, would you still take the medicine?

If a realtor could sell your home in this market, but was divorced, would you let him sell it?


Newt may or may not be great in a relationship, I don't know the specifics, but the man is very knowledgable in history and has a great conservative and realistic view of how our government should run. He's a great candidate and if the people here can't get over his marital troubles, then we will all lose in the end.


68 posted on 10/18/2006 11:26:40 AM PDT by HelloooClareece ("We make war that we may live in peace". Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: rob777

Newt Gingrich/Ben Stein in 2008


69 posted on 10/18/2006 11:26:55 AM PDT by Lewite (Praise YAHWEH and Proclaim His Wonderful Name! Islam, the end time Beast-the harlot of Babylon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rob777

Newt Gingrich/Ben Stein in 2008
or
Ben Stein/Karl Rove, talk about demoncrap blood vessels bursting like gangbusters!!!


70 posted on 10/18/2006 11:28:29 AM PDT by Lewite (Praise YAHWEH and Proclaim His Wonderful Name! Islam, the end time Beast-the harlot of Babylon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rob777

Neutered Newt still alive? Hmn!


71 posted on 10/18/2006 11:30:17 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Well, if he runs, you won't have any choice. It will be the main thing written about him.

You are completely ignoring Newt's involvement in this discussion. It is almost as if he is a passive observer and couldn't shape the discussion as he chooses, which couldn't be farther from the truth. If Newt were to run again it would be with something like the Contract with America. The media wouldn't have a choice on whether on not to discuss that. Newt has had several years to lick his wounds and prepare for the next round. It isn't 1999 again.

72 posted on 10/18/2006 11:30:40 AM PDT by burzum (Despair not! I shall inspire you by charging blindly on!--Minsc, BG2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains

Any Republican who complained about Clinton's marital failures and thinks Newts are no big deal is a hypocrite
________________________________________________________


Allegations of rape and Oval Office sodomy might account for the different points of view.


73 posted on 10/18/2006 11:34:56 AM PDT by wally-balls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

Wow...how is one worse than the other? A lie is a lie regardless(whether under oath or not).


74 posted on 10/18/2006 11:35:20 AM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: FreedomProtector

Yes!!


75 posted on 10/18/2006 11:38:56 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rob777

No one can deny that Newt made some brilliant moves in 1994. Trouble is that at the first whine from the liberals, Newt chose to resign. How are we to believe he would not do the same thing, if he were President?


76 posted on 10/18/2006 11:39:01 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell ( I predict a victory for Republicans that will make Dims remember 1994 as the good old' days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rob777

Infidelities aside (and I'm saying that ONLY for the sake of argument), Newt got rolled pretty badly on the government shutdown. No one that inept in the face of opposition -- even, or perhaps especially, unfair opposition -- should be President.


77 posted on 10/18/2006 11:39:39 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geezerwheezer

As much as I admire Newt's intellect and ability to take it to the dimcrats, I do sense that Gingrich's Achilles' heel is his desire to be liked.

He has been so banged up by the media as the scourge of all scrooges that I know he just couldn't make the tough decisions behind the Oval Office desk.

That was Clinton's fatal flaw (apart from that other one), and I fear Newt suffers the same disposition to please.


78 posted on 10/18/2006 11:40:38 AM PDT by A'elian' nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: angkor

He's been married THREE times.


79 posted on 10/18/2006 11:41:58 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains

Newt walked the walk and talked the talk.

He did the stand up thing when he resigned.

unlike clinton.

Now that we KNOW and he has fallen on his sword, we can evuate his qualifications. The measure of a man is his deeds. When Newt had done wrong he then did the correct thing to right the wrong as was appropriate for his station.

However Newt can make a difference, in fact a R majority makes it an even better launch vehicle for him.

(remember the picture of all the elephants at Captiol Hill.)


80 posted on 10/18/2006 11:42:02 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson