To: Dr. Marten
The data storage capabilities required to do this would dwarf anything else out there.
Why not require phone companies to record all conversations, too, just in case the FBI wants to listen to them?
2 posted on
10/18/2006 8:39:08 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why not require phone companies to record all conversations, too, just in case the FBI wants to listen to them? Wait, don't forget we have to tell the postal service to make photocopies of all the paper snail mail too, just in case...
9 posted on
10/18/2006 8:52:10 AM PDT by
USF
(I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Can't they just get all the data from the NSA?
18 posted on
10/18/2006 8:58:35 AM PDT by
HereInTheHeartland
(Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The data storage capabilities required to do this would dwarf anything else out there. From the article:
Privacy groups and industry groups have generally opposed mandatory data retention, with some companies such as Comcast voluntarily agreeing to retain user data for longer periods.
Hell, the data storage capabilities required to maintain a list of reasons why Comcast sucks would dwarf anything else out there. The list just got a bit longer....
20 posted on
10/18/2006 8:59:20 AM PDT by
steve-b
(It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The data storage capabilities required to do this would dwarf anything else out there. Why not require phone companies to record all conversations, too, just in case the FBI wants to listen to them?
Sheesh! This is beginning to sound like the ultra-paranoid efforts of the Stasi!
22 posted on
10/18/2006 9:00:39 AM PDT by
TChris
(The United Nations is suffering from delusions of relevance.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson