No thanks, we're stupid...... (conservatives who stay home)

Wash Times ^ | October 18, 2006 | Tony Blankley

[Howlin]

On the contrary, if they win the next election, they will learn that they don't need our votes.

They already figured that out LAST time.

I suspect that's why you all are squealing like stuck pigs.

Like I said before, it's amazing what a good swift kick in the butt will do.

Enjoy your irrelevancy.

[maryz]

Um, I was agreeing with you. There used to be quite a few conservatives in local races, but they were almost all Democrats. It's the MA GOP that wants to ditch the social conservatives and has wanted to for a while. They floated the idea (a few years ago) of putting a pro-abortion plank in the state GOP platform. I switched to Independent. So now we seldom have a conservative of either party to vote for. And the GOP is all but dead.

[A.Hun]

My point was that as screwed up as MA is, no conservative has a prayer regardless of their party affiliation.

For a state that blue, the GOP has to be liberal to maintain any presence at all. Pretty much the same for CT. That's not the GOP in MA's fault, that is the fault of the MA voters.

I don't blame you for switching to independent at all. So would I. But, even a liberal Republican is better than a Democrat.

[maryz]

Reagan carried MA both times. And if no one makes the argument, no one hears it. The liberals here are loud, but most of the people I know in Boston are either conservative or not very political. Many of the non-political are conservative in their leanings but don't know enough to put that name on it.

[A.Hun]

And if no one makes the argument, no one hears it.

I do agree with that.

[Dan Evans]

Enjoy your irrelevancy.

How can a political issue become irrelevant? Illegal immigration will not stop affecting the nation if you ignore it. California will not cease morphing into a banana republic if you shut out the people who complain about it. Burying your head in the sand does not make the world go away.

[onyx]

So is this the thread where people sign up to show just how willing they are to put their own personal agenda before that of the country's?

Tbis is one thread --- there will be more.

This is cool; now we have a list to consult for future reference concerning just WHO is and isn't with us!

LOL --- it's a start.

[Howlin]

And exactly what will YOU be able to do about it if you help take the ONLY party that is trying to do something about it out of power?

[BlackElk]

O: That Libertarians are perceived, fairly or not, as pro-abortion, pro-homosexuality and, often, not particularly religious, does not help them. They are wonderful on guns, tax reduction, regulatory reduction, government reduction, opposition to the welfare state and a bunch of other issues but, when I vote, I cannot ignore my Catholic Faith and abandon the babies or the family. I know some admirably pro-life libertarians but they are a small minority in libertarianism. More than many Libertarians imagine, these are vital issues to religious conservatives. Many Libertarians are also entirely too comfortable with the atheistic but anti-Marxist materialism of Ayn Rand for religious voters' comfort. We too are anti-Marxist but that is not enough.

Libertarians also have the virtue of being reliably principled people who have taken the trouble to study many of the things that matter and to react accordingly. I have my disagreements with some of their conclusions.

There are also those (libertarian or otherwise)who prattle on reflexively attacking what they call "neo-cons" who are more accurately called "conservatives." Paleo-pacifism is NOT conservatism. Conservatives are grown-ups.

We are less than three weeks from a very dangerous election. If the GOP wins, Hastert and Boehner should probably go. We need more charismatic and principled leadership. We need wartime generals in House and Senate. If the GOP loses, we need new leadership even more so, the Demonrats should get not one moment of "honeymoon" and our attacks must be relentless.

[onyx]

We are less than three weeks from a very dangerous election. If the GOP wins, Hastert and Boehner should probably go. We need more charismatic and principled leadership. We need wartime generals in House and Senate. If the GOP loses, we need new leadership even more so, the Demonrats should get not one moment of "honeymoon" and our attacks must be relentless.

I concur.

[BlackElk]

Imagine an Inaugural Parade on January 21, 2009: Preceding the Presidential Limo, carrying a newly triumphant Mrs. Arkansas Antichrist and the old lecher himself (Don't Stop Thinking about the Interns!), is the newly re-elected Speaker Nancy Pelosi, escorted by a few thousand fruits, nuts and vegetables and a strong contingent of Dykes on Bikes.

After a surprise coup in the Senate Leadership contest (Senator Harry Reid's whereabouts are still unknown as well as the whereabouts of Senators Joe Lieberman, Ben Nelson, and Bill Nelson, new Senate Majority Leader Charles (Chuckie) Schumer, riding with top assistants Senator Tom Harkin, Senator Barbara Boxer and new Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Edward M. (hic!) Kennedy, preceded Pelosi's vehicle and entourage. The actual swearing in of the Hldebeast was performed by Madame Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg when the Chief Justice was taken suddenly ill at the very thought of what was being inaugurated. Ms. Ginsberg also presented the new President with her resignation from the SCOTUS and those of Ms. Justice Souter and Mr. Justice John Paul Stephens as inauguration presents to allow Mrs. Antichrist to appoint her husband as Chief Justice and two 35-year old refugees from sanity as her first presidential appointments.....

[LowOiL]

Well, since you believe that then I suggest that you vote for the DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF EVIL in fact all you stay at homers who do not want to vote stay home.

I suggest you reread my posts sir, and not post while under the influence. I never miss an election, don't plan on it.

Also, read exactly where I said I don't plan on voting for evil, that most definitely includes most Dim candidates.

.

.

and have a rougher time by foreign countries invade us,

We have that now.. and a president that supports it.

.

.

.

set back, bytch and moan that we, the republican party didn't do enough when you refused to get off your lazy a$$ and go vote REPUBLICAN!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1070896/posts

"Let’s remember, we’re Free Republic, not some wanna be site, and certainly, we’re not some liberal chat site. Let’s keep our standards high. Strive for excellence. For the most part, we are educated, responsible adults. A simple comment to that effect will suffice. We don't need to see F*** or s***. The English language is a great tool; learn to use it. It really lowers your credibility as a poster when you resort to profanity and flames. It takes finesse to make your point without using these tactics." -- Admin Moderator

Having not missed an election since I was just a few months over 18 and voting for Reagan (if you had bothered to read my post you would of known this), I don't see where I once inferred I would skip voting. I just said I would not vote the lesser of two evils as Biblically commanded. I posted scripture, you have not done anything but misquote and curse.

You obvious need to clean up your act for the parties sake (and FR's). Good day sir.

[katyusha]

Congrajulations,
You ignored my entire reply and just took something I said entirely out of context. I'll grade you on the curve; here is an F+.