You didn't. You having reading comprehension trouble?
Perhaps you should re-read it. This time, pay attention to each and every word. And don't answer a question you want to answer, the one you made up, answer the one asked.
Respond to my answer or give up the gig, Prot. No one's falling for your little game here.
You asked about when the stakes have been low enough (to vote against a Republican, I presume). The question is flawed on its face because my statement didn't imply that such a time had ever existed. You just made that part up.
In response I spoke of the former Democrat party who at least cared about the safety of the country. In the past, one could vote for a Dem and not risk the very existence of this country and the survival of its people.
There is a greater chasm between the parties than there has ever been, and that, coupled with the fact that we are, for the first time in our history, fighting an enemy that wants to destroy every last one of us, and there has never been a time prior to 9/11 when the stakes were higher.
I don't want to presume to speak for every intelligent Republican on this board, but I would guess that if Zell Miller were running against Lincoln Chafee, that every one of us would vote for Zell. That is NOT what this thread is about.
But then, you knew that all along, and you knew what I was saying all along as well, didn't you? And you knew that I was right too, didn't you?
Stop playing games, Prot. It's tedious.