Bush on O'Reilly NOW

FoxNews ^

[don-o]

Actually - BOR laid on the wood pretty good at the end

[Laverne]

Woodward, like all journo's don't believe in secrets. If he had his way, he would print all the operational plans and disect them before they happen. His comment on getting the truth is ridiculous. The truth is told, its just not told with the secrets Woodward wants revealed. He thinks he is a star, in mybook, he is a dud.

[Txsleuth]

jeez louise, Woodward was just name-dropping like crazy...and all of them supposed Republicans..

And I LOVE this talking point he continues to use about Abizaid saying he was "this close" to Murtha..supposedly TO Murtha..

I don't believe Abizaid said any such thing to Murtha...

[BlueAngel]

I think that O'Reilly genuinely likes President Bush and would like to help him. IMHO

He just has to do the fair and balanced thing.

[oceanview]

ashcroft is on with Olbermann.

[Keith]

Wheaton Illinois...

[oceanview]

you know my opinion on abizaid. he is a big part of our problem in iraq.

[truthkeeper]

Where in hell is that fool from originally anyway? His accent is very off-putting to me. Sounds like maybe Ohio or Michigan?

Nooooo, NOT Michigan. Geneva, Illinois is his birthplace. (I just looked it up.)

[SunTzuWu]

Michelle Malkin on now!

[Txsleuth]

Ugh....I missed all but the good-byes with Ashcroft.

[jmc1969]

I completely believe Abizaid would say that.

Abizaid is a terrible general.

[vintage patriot]

That was a pretty good interview with Bush.

My question is: Will O'Reilly ask Bush when the Border Fence legislation will be signed?

[Mike Darancette]

You Gotta see this!!

Why Vote Republican?

[1035rep]

I think so too. Also it was a very good interview with President Bush, and I'm glad I didn't miss it.

[Chena]

Coming up next is the Bob Woodward rebuttal????? That's right, the Bob Woodward rebuttal!FOX and O'Reilly are way out in left field on this one, I think. Personally, I really don't give a damn what a jackass like Bob Woodward thinks.

I don't give a dang about Woodward's opinion either, but I do think that having someone who spouts such idiocy on after President Bush's interview was perfect. President Bush's thoughtful and intelligent responses were a perfect contrast to the idiocy of Woodward.

[NEWwoman]

Saw it. It was great!

[NYC Republican]

Thanks! Very nice

[LibLieSlayer]

Because the "bloviator" has more cred than russet-head and is known by the left as a bulldog. It pisses off hildebeast and company that Bush will look the lion in the face, while her so-called husband would only sit for Chris Wallace... who is NOT known to be a hard hitting interview. Chris is also a well known dim.

LLS

[LibLieSlayer]

woodless did NOT write this book!!! He kept referring to "in the book it quotes" and "in the book "the subject" says". It is as if his book is always referenced in third person. woodless NEVER STATES THAT HE HEARD SUCH AND SUCH AND HE WITNESSED SUCH AND SUCH. He simply took what a staff put together and typed it up. The bloviator nailed woodless three times, stating that those persons woodless quotes refute him. His only defense was, "If you read in THE book"...

Did anyone notice the quick fleeting "smirk" on our Great President's face, when bloviator asked him about Japan's announcement today that they were contemplating going Nuclear! Bloviator stated that China was concerned about that fact. It was a very satisfying expression!

LLS

[LibLieSlayer]

O'Reilly said he asked the General about that quote and the General told Bill that he was misconstrued by murtha. That is Pentagon speak (concerning pols) that translates to, "murtha is a lying sack of sh!t!

LLS