Posted on 10/16/2006 1:50:01 PM PDT by Brian Allen
As Hillary Clinton is being touted as a presidential candidate for the 2008 election we should take the time to reflect on her co-presidency that did so much to humiliate and degrade America. Let us not forget how the mainstream media covered up — and still is — those Clinton White House scandals that severely compromised US security and put at risk the lives of millions of Americans. I am of course alluding to the transfer of sensitive military technology to China.
This technology greatly improved the accuracy of Peking’s ICBMs that are now targeting American cities. Being the outrageous liar that he is, Clinton denied that USA cities had been targeted despite conclusive proof to the contrary by the CIA. Whose cities did Hillary and hubby think Beijing was going to target? Despite intelligence briefs, Clinton, with the approval of Hillary, knowingly allowed the export of hi-tech know-how to China by Loral, a company that was later investigated by a federal grand jury. That this involved classified information didn’t faze the Clintons one bit. Why was that I wonder?
Is it because in 1997 Bernard Schwarze, Loral’s chairman and CEO, made the largest personal contribution to the Democratic National Committee? The result of Schwarze’s treason (I’m sorry, I meant donation) was that the Clintons got what they wanted — money, Beijing got what it wanted, Schwartz got what he wanted and Americans got to be targets for Chinese missiles. Guess who’s ended up with the biggest grin?
Naturally, the whole smelly deal led right back to Chinese funding for the Clintons’ election campaign. Anyone who thinks Beijing would fund anyone without getting something in exchange is definitely inhaling. The CIA and FBI knew that Beijing was running agents in the US in the guise of fund-raisers for the Democratic National Committee. Charlie Trie, who ‘contributed’ oodles of lettuce to the Clintons’ defence fund, is unquestionably a Chinese agent. It was Charlie who introduced Ol’ Slickory to the Chairman of the Chinese Communist Polytech at a White House fund-raiser. This gentleman, surprise, surprise, is also connected with Chinese intelligence. Not that this would have bother Bubba Clinton and Madam Dragonfly, both of whom still seem to think everything is for sale, even their country’s national security. After all, if the Clintons had beeb genuinely concerned with defending the country they would not have ignored the CIA’s intelligence briefs.
Some might think that I’m drawing a long bow on this. No way. When Johnny Chung didn’t get what he wanted on PRC visitors to the White House with whom did he meet? You guessed it, Hillary. And did she give him what he wanted? You bet she did. Now why would she do that? For fear of appearing churlish there were Hillary’s long-standing ties with Charlie Trie that went right back to Littlerock. That Charlie was a money-peddling Chinese agent was just bad luck for her — not to mention the country — wasn’t it? And who had Johnny Huang, another Chinese agent, appointed to the Commerce Department? Right again. It was Hillary. Boy, she sure knew how to pick ‘em.
We all know that there were serious security leaks from the Clinton White House. Equally, there is no doubt about the source of those leaks, which brings us directly back to Hillary the Succubus. She took it upon herself, with her husband’s happy support, to select a great many of the White House staff. Many of these appointees were known, and still are, for their extreme left-wing views and their belief that the US is an unjust, racist, sexist and exploitative society. It should come as no surprise, therefore, if this deep-rooted animosity to their own country should take the form of an occasional phone call to a Chinese agent. Of course, if this had been anyone else, except the Groper, it would have immediately raised questions about why this pair were so keen on appointing people who despise their own society.
Does anyone really believe Hillary Clinton has changed? Does anyone think that if she were president she would not bring in the same ratbag America-haters as before with all that that entails?
Gerard Jackson is Brookes’ economics editor
.
From the very beginning, we've been busy asking here:
....Is it Safe..?
...HILLARY RODHAM: Security Risk on Armed Services Committee
http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/835800/posts
.
<< That's very strange...I try to keep up .... >>
Try harder.
The last of the long dead and decadent North-Western Euro-peons having more than sixty years ago given up even pretending to responsibility for their own defense, (as most of them did almost ninety years ago) the Berlin Wall was America's effective border from the minute it was completed until then United States of America's President and Armed-Forces Commander-in-Chief, Ronald Wilson Reagan, with a little help from his as-courageous FRiends -- union leader, Lech Walesa and His Holiness Pope John Paul II -- brought about the destruction of the evil empire whose millions of slaves it contained -- and saw to its tearing down.
<< From the very beginning, we've been busy asking here:
....Is it Safe..? >>
Relax, Ronnie - quit your business.
Think of it as having the world's most prolific living mass-murderer, (Tibet) Peking's Hu, Marc Rich, George Soros, Osama bin Laden, Putin, Kim Jong Il, the Cali cartel and anyone else with two shillings to add to Web Hubbel's daughter, Chelsea Cli'ton's already more than Four Billion Dollar trust fund, once again, as during 1993 - 2001, represented in our oval office.
.
HILLARY on the Senate Armed Services Committee =
HILLARY Fetchingly invites RUMSFELD to testify before the Committee about the War in Iraq, where she promptly tells him to RESIGN from Office
The Enemy is now Within...
...and always has been.
.
.
Another Hit from the Past:
"CHELSEA is COMPLICIT in covering for the CLINTONS own worst misbehaviors"
-Posted on www.Freerepublic.com
-Posted on KCAL-TV Channel 9 Los Angeles Evening News
Sometimes ya just gotta do what you gotta do,
...for FREEDOM..?
.
<< Please try and follow what we were talking about, if your (sic) able.... >>
I responded to your comment about then president Mr Reagan in the context of the Berlin Wall.
While you're on the topic of America's land borders, however, sad to say Mr Reagan signed the 1986 amnesty into law and thus gets to own almost as much responsibility for the current state of the criminal alien invasion as do the traitors, Kennedy, the Cli'tons and Al(Fredo) Gore(leone)!
Also sad to say, that if it was possible to view that aspect of his presidency on its own -- and it most emphatically is not -- insofar as his administration's continuing neglect of its primary duty to protect our nation against invaders and its attitudes and actions and lack of action insofar as every other aspect of the current criminal alien invasion -- and border questions in general -- are concerned, current president, Mr Bush, would deserve to be impeached.
Perhaps you should re-read Rockefeller's memo and refresh your memory on what barriers President Bush has had to face since first taking over the Oval Office. Anyone less in stature would have walked out the front WH door by now. IMO,as one who has suffered tragically from the consequences of this war, I think it's disgusting of you to say President Bush deserves to be impeached.
So, what you are really saying is that the reports are true: Bush can't more than one thing at a time.
What drivel.
What you are also doing is making excuses for the Clinton admin. If Bush can only handle so much then the same excuse could be used for Clinton.
"Bush can't more than one thing at a time."
Sorry you lost me there. I don't want to misread what you wrote. The pictures I used were to represent priorities and accomplishments. The over whelming majority of "illegal aliens" are not "terrorists". American immigrants know the difference. I apologize if you didn't understand.
None but W should have jumped on the border issue right after 911. He's been moving at snails pace, and only after a groundswell of calls for stopping the waves of illegals.
By extrapolation, one could use the same excuse for Clinton. He was too busy with other things and couldn't handle national security.
You can't have it both ways. Either the president is responsible for all things in the Executive branch or he gets an excuse. He has virtually millions of people working for him. Claiming he's too busy on certain issues therby excusing him from taking care of all of his responsibilities is just an excuse.
Sorry, people who use quotes from the Bible to make a point are out of an argument.
Let's cut this short by telling us the political candidate you're stumping for since you've made it a point to condemn President Bush and the Republican party.
Who do you recommend?
And if you were president between 2000 and now, how would you have done things differently?
I don't care to hear more condemnations. I could waste my time in front of the TV to get condemnations for any politician and political party. If you have a plan, then share it. If you have a champion, who is it?
I did not condemn Bush and the Pubs. I condemned your argument. By giving Bush the excuse you did you provide the same excuse for Clinton.
oops, "bordered" is suppose to be "borders".
I can't answer that. I don't have all the info Bush has. I wasn't elected to lead the American people. Bush was. Apparently with the millions of people he has working for him he still can't get the borders secure.
You tell me why it's not a priority for him.
Forget Bush and Clinton.
Why? We are discussing your original post that was an attempt to provide Bush with an excuse for neglecting our borders. That's what I disagree with.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.