1 posted on
10/16/2006 7:43:56 AM PDT by
SmithL
To: SmithL
Yeah - he's a journalist.
And I'm the Czarina of all the Russias.
To: SmithL
Leave him in there... hindering a criminal investigation... maybe aiding/abetting an assault... criminal conspiracy...
3 posted on
10/16/2006 7:47:26 AM PDT by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: SmithL
Is that the prison in the background where he will be locked-up?
To: SmithL
Nonsense, he ahs video of a assualt on a police officer, he is not turing evidence over to the investigation,
I hope Mondays is chicken fried steak day.
5 posted on
10/16/2006 7:47:59 AM PDT by
p[adre29
(Arma in armatos)
To: SmithL
guy looks like RIck Moranis
6 posted on
10/16/2006 7:48:31 AM PDT by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
To: SmithL
If butt ugliness were a crime, he'd never smell freedom again.
7 posted on
10/16/2006 7:48:48 AM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: SmithL
Why do commies always look so dorky?
To: SmithL
Well.....
I am sure he is used to getting beat up alot. Maybe we could all pull together and work up enough money to by him a few bars of soap on a rope.
To me he looks like a cross between Rick Moranis and Booger of Revenge of the Nerds fame.
Way to go Josh..............
LOOO OOOO OOOO ZZZZZZZER!
14 posted on
10/16/2006 8:21:53 AM PDT by
baystaterebel
(http://omphalosgazer.blogspot.com/)
To: SmithL
We are all journalists- though the MSM would like journalists to be above the law- hence their pursuit of a shield law to protect their lying. In that pursuit of course they are also seeking to become a separate class of people from ordinary citizens- and they seek to deny every American's right to be a part of the press.
Josh Wolf's problem isn't that he's not a journalist. His problem is that he's not above the law and he is witholding evidence of a crime. HIs problem is that journalists are not above the law though many think they are.
Neither he nor a journalist working for the NY Times is - or should be- entitled to withhold evidence of a crime.
The first ammendment wasn't established for a special class of people- it applies to us all. But in its protection of free speech there is nothing there ensuring that we have some kind of right to conceal information or withold speech.
20 posted on
10/16/2006 11:39:05 AM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: SmithL
Little pantywaist.
24 posted on
10/16/2006 12:51:46 PM PDT by
New Perspective
(Proud father of an 2 year old son with Down Syndrome)
To: SmithL
If he has footage of the situation when the police officer was injured, he should turn it over.
If he doesn't, he should go free.
If he's worried about the police seeing other footage I'm sure there is a disinterested observer that can watch the footage and tell the police whether the footage they want is there or not.
It ain't rocket science.
25 posted on
10/16/2006 12:57:03 PM PDT by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: SmithL
Wow. You couldn't get that loser laid in a brothel.
28 posted on
10/16/2006 1:04:53 PM PDT by
CougarGA7
(This tag line will be commercial free for the remainder of this thread.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
