Putin Gets Away With Murder

Weekly Standard ^ | 10/23/06 | Anders Åslund

[Donna Lee Nardo]

Putin Gets Away with Murder It's time to confront the Russian leader. by Anders Åslund 10/23/2006, Volume 012, Issue 06

IN RUSSIA, gangsters have the macabre custom of making a birthday present of a murder. On Vladimir Putin's 54th birthday, one of his fiercest domestic critics, the journalist Anna Politkovskaya, was shot to death in her apartment building in central Moscow. She worked for the weekly Novaya Gazeta, Russia's last independent newspaper. Its deputy editor was murdered a couple of years ago, and the killer was never found. Although Politkovskaya had been tailed by the FSB for years and her murderer was captured on film, he got away. The Kremlin has made no comment. The prosecutor general claims to have personally taken charge of the investigation, but such investigations seldom result in an arrest.

Western policy toward Russia has been an unmitigated failure since Vladimir Putin became president on New Year's Eve 1999. Every year since then, the Russian government has moved further away from both the United States and the European Union, and Western influence over Russia has waned.

In the last year, President Putin has exported ground-to-air missiles to Iran that can shoot down American F-16s. He has exported arms to Syria that were successfully used by Hezbollah against Israel. A year ago, the Kremlin cheered when Uzbekistan evicted a large U.S. air base, and now it is encouraging Kyrgyzstan to do the same.

Meanwhile, state-controlled Russian media spew out nationalist and anti-Western propaganda. Every evening after the first state channel's main newscast, one of the Kremlin's foremost propagandists, Mikhail Leontiev, delivers his daily diatribe against the West.

To consider Putin a strategic partner or even ally would be to close one's eyes to reality. If Putin persistently behaves like an enemy of both the United States and the E.U., we had better pick up the gauntlet. Only a fool or a coward would do otherwise.

The G-8 summit in St. Petersburg in July became a symbol of all that is wrong with Western policy toward Russia. For three days, the Western leaders participated in this televised celebration of Putin's new authoritarian powers, and they got nothing in return.

To flatter himself further, Putin invited the presidents of the other eleven former Soviet states for the ensuing week, but they know how to handle him. A few hours before the summit, four of them dropped out--two announcing that they were going on vacations. By contrast, in St. Petersburg it was President Bush who endured Putin's insult ("We certainly would not want to have the same kind of democracy as they have in Iraq.").

The fundamental problem of Western policy toward Russia is that it is still based on the idea that the Cold War is over. Alas, this truth has become obsolete, as Putin has gone about reviving one feature after another of a police state, including authoritarian rule and an anti-Western foreign policy.

The West has retained the same friendly but half-hearted policy toward Russia it pursued under Boris Yeltsin. But Putin is no Yeltsin. In fact, Putin is the anti-Yeltsin. What ever Yeltsin was, Putin is not. Whatever policy the West pursued toward Yeltsin should be replaced with its opposite--with a few exceptions: Not even Putin wants to revive Communist ideol ogy, and Russia remains a market economy.

Although poorly understood in the West, Yeltsin was a democrat, as Leon Aron shows in his excellent biography. Yeltsin believed in free and fair elections and free media. Putin, by contrast, is a secret policeman. In his book First Person, made up of in terviews, he marvels at his own skillful repression of dissidents.

Putin talks about dem ocracy while systematically destroying it, as Berkeley political scientist Steven Fish has detailed in Democracy Derailed in Russia. Putin has mostly destroyed press freedom, deprived both par liamentary chambers of power, undermined free elections, eliminated the election of regional governors, and seized control over the courts. Where Boris Yeltsin boldly and peacefully dissolved the Soviet empire, giving its peoples freedom, his successor has publicly complained that this was the "greatest geopolitical tragedy of the 20th century."

Yeltsin believed in private enterprise. He has been criticized for privatizing the Russian economy in the only way that was possible, rather than leaving a larger share in the hands of the state. Putin is currently undertaking the greatest re-nationalization the world has seen.

Yeltsin regarded both himself and Russia as part of the free and democratic Western world, while Putin does not. He criticizes both the United States and the E.U. in ever more paranoid and conspiratorial language, while praising China more and more. Unlike Westerners, the Chinese do not ask nosy questions about authoritarianism, corruption, and money-laundering, questions for which Putin has no good answers.

In the end, Yeltsin was one of us, although larger than life. So it was worth talking to him and exploring our common interests through quiet diplomacy. The opposite is true of Putin. He gives lip service to our values, but regularly undermines them. A liar should not be treated like a gentleman.

On a few points, the United States has got its policy toward Russia right. First, the United States and the E.U. stood up for democracy during Ukraine's Orange Revolution, and Putin accepted defeat. Second, the West protested loudly against the restrictive Russian draft legislation on nongovernmental organizations, which was softened. Third, the Western outcry over Russia's cutoff of gas supplies to Ukraine last January led to an immediate resumption of deliveries. Putin was upset, but he changed his policy. And the recent U.S. embargo against the Russian state arms export agency Rosoboronexport and the military aircraft producer Sukhoi because of their deliveries of sophisticated arms to Iran is another step in the right direction.

The lesson is that Putin only responds if protests are loud, public, and backed up by threats. Rather than talking about the Cold War being over (which is true), we should remember that the most successful policies toward the Soviet Union were those of Ronald Reagan.

It could be argued that Western policy toward Russia has not mattered much in recent years because Russia has been too weak to dare to be foolhardy. That is no longer the case. In 1999, Russia's GDP was $200 billion in current dollars. This year, it will reach $920 billion. Russia has financial surpluses to waste on foolish policies at home, and perhaps also abroad.

Right now, Russia is apparently preparing for a war against the independent former Soviet republic of Georgia. With no justification whatsoever, Putin personally has accused Georgia of state terrorism. He likened the arrest of four senior Russian military spies in Georgia to the acts of Stalin's henchman Lavrenty Beria. Russia has evacuated its diplomats and citizens from Georgia and imposed a nearly complete embargo. Major Russian military maneuvers are under way.

Most analysts draw parallels to Yeltsin and argue that Russia's actions are meant only to frighten. I doubt that. Putin is a warrior. He won his presidency on a very dubious war, the second war in Chechnya--the region whose agony Anna Politkovskaya covered at the cost of her life. Putin won his reelection and authoritarian rule with his war against the oligarchs, especially his confiscation of the Yukos oil company. It is a logical next step to illegally prolong that rule by starting a war against Georgia.

It couldn't be plainer that the United States needs a serious policy toward Russia and needs it fast.

Anders Åslund is a senior fellow at the Institute for International Economics in Washington.

© Copyright 2006, News Corporation, Weekly Standard, All Rights Reserved.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/824dulje.asp

[nw_arizona_granny]

It couldn't be plainer that the United States needs a serious policy toward Russia and needs it fast. <<<

Morning to you, thanks for posting this.

Too much going on over there, to make one sleep well at night.

[nw_arizona_granny]

ping.

[GarySpFc]

I think Putin would fare far better if he would quote Teddy Roosevelt instead of FDR!

Agreed, but even FDR had some good thoughts. Inded, I have little doubt Putin and TR had some things in common. In the case quoted Putin was quoting the view that gaining wealth by raping others is wrong.

[M. Espinola]

"Let's see, Putin has a 77% favorable rating with Russians, which compares with Ronald Reagan's best."

How dare you place that KGB pig in the same line as America's greatest president (Ronald Reagan) of the 20th century.

The anti-Western, terrorist exporting Axis of Evil régimes are the identical collection of thugs Czar Putin is arming to the teeth today.

Russian weapons, sold by Putin, to those Axis of Evil dictatorships & their cohorts, are murdering American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, but what do you care as long as your boy Putin has the best public relations you can provide.

Your own anti-American propaganda speaks loud and clear.

"If Westerners worried that Russian President Vladimir Putin would escalate the stinging war of words with the Bush administration, notably the combative Vice President Dick Cheney, they can rest easy. .."

"..I now spend a lot of time in Moscow running the American University in Moscow,..."

(I bet you do at that, "comrade".)

[Tailgunner Joe]

gaining wealth by raping others is wrong

But it's just fine gaining wealth by selling missiles and uranium to the Ayatollahs, submarines to Red China and fighter jets and machineguns to Hugo Chavez.

[MarMema]

No link, what's the date on that writing you posted?

[Donna Lee Nardo]

:) Touche.

[GarySpFc]

This weekend we had a Special Forces Association meeting, and they had nothing but good to say about the relaionship between America and Russia. Indeed, Roger Donlon, Medal of Honor winner, told of marching in a parade in Moscow. They were pro-Russia and told of having good relationships with Spetsnaz. The only KGB pig here appears to be your little bitter mind.

[Tailgunner Joe]

Not to mention rockets and intelligence to Hizb-allah via Syria. Killing Israelis can be profitable too.

[GarySpFc]

Who was the individual who posted the lying article on Free Republic that Putin awarded Kim Jong the Medal or Honor, when in reality it was only one of several million medals? Did that individual love the truth enough to correct that error?

[GarySpFc]

No link, what's the date on that writing you posted?

This article originally appeared in Washington Times on May 15, 2006

[Donna Lee Nardo]

Hey, you know the rule...

Oh wait...this thread is not about Bibi. [I'm blushing now.]

BTW, you have many great Putin photos!

[Donna Lee Nardo]

Please gentlemen, Puttie-Put put out a warning that heads will roll faster than those of some recent Russian journalists if there is any arguing on his thread. ;)

[MarMema]

You cannot deny the tyrannical behavior of the Russian leadership today. They willingly put themselves in the news as bullies.

And anyone who thinks they have a police force that is actually functional is beyond help, I believe.

Russia consistently over the last few years rates in the top five for corruption by those watchdog groups.

[GarySpFc]

But it's just fine gaining wealth by selling missiles and uranium to the Ayatollahs, submarines to Red China and fighter jets and machineguns to Hugo Chavez.

There is a difference between gaining wealth and surviving. Apparently you have never heard of Saudi Arabia or Egypt. I seem to remember we sell F-15's and AWACS to S.A. BTW, AKs are not considered machine guns.

[Donna Lee Nardo]

You are correct as well. Many of our allies in capitalism peeve some of our WOT and other strategic partners.

[Admin Moderator]

Bloomberg Publications has requested that Free Republic allow none of their material to be posted.

[GarySpFc]

You cannot deny the tyrannical behavior of the Russian leadership today. They willingly put themselves in the news as bullies.

Let's see, Georgia fragrantly violates the Geneva Convention, and they would lecture Russia?

And anyone who thinks they have a police force that is actually functional is beyond help, I believe.

I learned a long time not to stereotype all individuals into one group, because as a Christian I recognize the distinction between good and bad. Consistently calling good evil or evil good is a dangerous way for a Christian to think.

Russia consistently over the last few years rates in the top five for corruption by those watchdog groups

Who is those, and what are their qualifications for making that judgment? That said, on this 2005 corruption list Russia rates number 126 and Georgia 130. The 2005 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index That said, I fully realize this is a judgment call on these countries.

[M. Espinola]

Sure comrade, relations between America and Russia and just bloody ducky -lol

Say hi to Uncle Vlad on the next trip to Moscow :)