Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Gay Old Party Comes Out
The NYTimes ^ | 10-15-06 | Frank Rich

Posted on 10/15/2006 7:35:37 PM PDT by split

October 15, 2006 Op-Ed Columnist The Gay Old Party Comes Out

By FRANK RICH Here’s a gay Republican story you probably did not hear last week. On Tuesday a card-carrying homosexual, Mark Dybul, was sworn into office at the State Department with his partner holding the Bible. Dr. Dybul, was flanked by Laura Bush and Condi Rice. In her official remarks, the secretary of state referred to the mother of Dr. Dybul’s partner as his “mother-in-law.”

If anything good has come out of the Foley scandal, it is surely this: The revelation that the political party fond of demonizing homosexuals each election year is as well-stocked with trusted and accomplished gay leaders as virtually every other power center in America. “ “Across the board gay people are in leadership positions.” Yet it is this same party’s Congressional leadership that in 2006 did almost nothing about government spending, Iraq, immigration or ethics reform, but did drop everything to focus on a doomed constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

The split between the Republicans’ outward homophobia and inner gayness isn’t just hypocrisy; it’s pathology. Take the bizarre case of Karl Rove. Every one of his Bush campaigns has been marked by a dirty dealing of the gay card, dating back to the lesbian whispers that pursued Ann Richards when Mr. Bush ousted her as Texas governor in 1994. Yet we now learn from “The Architect,” the recent book by the Texas journalists James Moore and Wayne Slater, that Mr. Rove’s own (and beloved) adoptive father, Louis Rove, was openly gay in the years before his death in 2004. This will be a future case study for psychiatric clinicians as well as historians.

(Excerpt) Read more at select.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: frankrich; homosexualagenda; liberalsgaybashing; lookmaimatroll; nytimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 10/15/2006 7:35:38 PM PDT by split
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: split
So who's bitch is Frank Rich?
2 posted on 10/15/2006 7:38:41 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: split

Frank Rich is a DEVIL....a GAY DEVIL.


3 posted on 10/15/2006 7:40:17 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

He was dating Maureen Dowd until Maureen told him that she preferred men.


4 posted on 10/15/2006 7:41:21 PM PDT by Perdogg (Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

just an enabled Clintoid


5 posted on 10/15/2006 7:42:04 PM PDT by advertising guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

He wanted to be MONICA!!


6 posted on 10/15/2006 7:42:56 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: split
"The revelation that the political party fond of demonizing homosexuals each election year..."

I wonder which party he's talking about. Maybe Mary Cheney could tell me.
7 posted on 10/15/2006 7:44:11 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: split
"Yet it is this same party’s Congressional leadership that in 2006 did almost nothing about government spending, Iraq, immigration or ethics reform, but did drop everything to focus on a doomed constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage."

Hate to say it, but he has a point... especially if you subsitute "border security" for "immigration".
8 posted on 10/15/2006 7:45:29 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: split
Just today I was thinking "Wow, that Rove-bashing book went nowhere, didn't it?" ANd here's Frank Rich to try to sell some copies with the SHOCKING revelation that Karl Rove's dad was a fag--which has what, exactly, to do with Rove? And this crap about Rove using homophobia to get votes is a democrat lie, all just to create a phony controversy.

The Republicans don't hate gays--we just don't push their agenda. Why is that so damned hard for Frankie to understand? Where is the hypocrisy in having a gay man sworn in with his partner present--how would the administration know or care about him having a partner? Wouldn't Frankie be crying like a bitch if he found out the administration canned this guy (so to speak) upon discovering this?

The pathology is with widdle Frankie and the democrats who actively push the gay agenda, and then try to win an election by demanding a gay congressman's IMs be monitored by the congressional leadership, and who use that congressman's gay behavior to scare people into voting out Republicans. Explain that one Frankie, you ignorant loon. Now go play some shotunes, you former drama critic, you.

9 posted on 10/15/2006 7:45:54 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Republican, atheist, pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: split

Liberals don't get it. Opposing Affirmative Action has nothing to do with racism. Closing the border is not anti-immigrant. And opposing the Gay Rights Agenda and protecting marriage is not about hurting gays.


10 posted on 10/15/2006 7:46:16 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: split
lol, Frank Rich is hysterical!! Probably swooning on his couch after this publication. lol.

The revelation that the political party fond of demonizing homosexuals each election year is as well-stocked with trusted and accomplished gay leaders as virtually every other power center in America. “

How trite. Republicans have not "demonized" gays; they have said they were not for gay "marriage". Gay unions? Domestic Partnership umbrella laws, yes. But marriage? So, marriage is to gays like abortion is to the feminists? The core altar of their "modus"?

How nifty of Frank to make that clear: That only gays demanding marriage are the *real* gays; everyone else is fluff! Gays cannot work alongside us UNLESS we all agree to alter every culture in the world to accommodate "gay marriage". Gays cannot be our friends if we disagree with "gay marriage". Gays cannot be allowed anywhere unless we pay homage and host to "gay marriage".

I think I'd rather watch frank rich, live, hold his breath until he turns blue. Then, all of us who share concensus reality can have an easy laugh together.

11 posted on 10/15/2006 7:46:34 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: split

Hilarious. Libs can't seem to get their head around the fact that one can oppose homosexuality and at the same time not hate or mistreat homosexuals.


12 posted on 10/15/2006 7:47:57 PM PDT by sam_whiskey (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: split
The Gay Old Party Comes Out

Coming from the Times' former theater critic...that's comedy.

13 posted on 10/15/2006 7:48:04 PM PDT by RichInOC (Frank-Studds. They're Not Just Our Names. They're Our Way Of Life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: split

Just part of the only strategy the left has: suppress turnout.


14 posted on 10/15/2006 7:48:10 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: split

Rich DOES love the gutter, doesn't he ?


15 posted on 10/15/2006 7:48:12 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

It ain't Denise Rich! (pictures optional;)


16 posted on 10/15/2006 7:56:56 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

I suspect I know why Frank is so fabulously thrilled by this.


17 posted on 10/15/2006 8:00:48 PM PDT by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Item: Is It A Crime To Hate Gays???

This Frank Rich just sounds like Another Weep-O-Crat to me.


18 posted on 10/15/2006 8:02:30 PM PDT by Weep-o-crat Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: split
The Slimes equates not wanting special rights with hatred.

I don't want special rights for anyone, therefore, I must hate all of humanity, pets, animals, and small household applicances.

Damn, how did I manage to make the baseball team, become a National Merit Scholar, get a Master's Degree, marry, have children, and earn a national award in my current profession by hating everything in sight?

19 posted on 10/15/2006 8:04:28 PM PDT by GoBucks2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: split
In her official remarks, the secretary of state referred to the mother of Dr. Dybul’s partner as his “mother-in-law.”

More proof why Rice is not a true conservative. It always starts with the abortion question, then you learn they are pro gay, then you learn they are environmentalist, then you learn their brand of fiscal conservatism is full of gaps and loopholes.

No thanks there's only one kind of conservative, and she's not it.

20 posted on 10/15/2006 8:06:24 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson