Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caseinpoint; Amerigomag; NormsRevenge; SierraWasp

Thank you for posting the recap. I decided to vote against it based on the summary descriptions and the LAO analysis. Your post has enlightened me to yet more reasons to vote NO! The part about no one being able to challenge the validity of the law after six months is the same kind of garbage that we got through the Stem-Cell initiative which has proven troublesome. I hope this thing goes down in flames.


17 posted on 10/14/2006 2:45:12 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: calcowgirl
We already have a "Gore Tax" on each and every business phone bill to supposedly provide internet service to remote rural areas kinda like the old Rural Electrification Agency set up in the olden days. I don't think it's really happening yet, however.

With Gore advertising for this and Clinton making a speech on it's behalf... What more would you or anyone else have to think over on this ridiculously extreme measure?

I've pretty much decided to vote against all the measures except 85 and 90. Am I makin any mistakes?

20 posted on 10/14/2006 2:54:04 PM PDT by SierraWasp (To be fair, Bill Clinton did more than any other President to protect us from the Branch Davidians!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson