Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl
They're not allowed to prevent an oil company from passing on the cost of a tax to consumers. Its an impairment of contract and is unconstitutional. DUH But try explaining logic and economic facts to the proponents of the Punitive Tax, Proposition 87.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

15 posted on 10/14/2006 2:30:20 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop

Off Topic... this one is too hard to excerpt for a meaningful thread, but I think you'd enjoy it. Jill Stewart with Jerry Brown--unplugged, lol.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009089


16 posted on 10/14/2006 2:34:03 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: goldstategop
They're not allowed to prevent an oil company from passing on the cost of a tax to consumers. Its an impairment of contract and is unconstitutional.

By requiring that the tax not be passed on to the consumers, but rather come out of the pockets of the oil companies, it is a bill of attainder. Actually, it is a bill of pains and penalties, but the attainder clause was clearly meant to cover bills of pains and penalties as well.

44 posted on 10/14/2006 8:11:00 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson