WAYYYYYY past time.
I think 1993 was a good time to start thinking about it.
He's a mad dog who will sell weapons to our enemies. A sniper shot is well justified..
National leaders are always against killing other national leaders, because they don't want to become targets themselves. They'd rather send millions of kids to be killed in wars. In Kim's case, I'd think the whole world would be glad to make an exception.
should of done it when mad albright was doing her little dance over there
I think it should be left to the Chinese.
It was time the day after his crazy daddy died.
A nuke would be a good message to certain nations in the world right now.
World: "We hate to use these nucular bombs, yes we really do. But there are times and situations, such as this one, that require the complete desolation of major cities. We really, really, really, didn't like having to do it."
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wait just a minute. Did Pat Robertson write this article?
Only thing I would disagree with is "I am not suggesting that we shoot Kim tomorrow..."
You don't have to assassinate Kim, just put him on the same diet he keeps the population of North Korea on and in a short amount of time he'll starve to death like millions of his countrymen have !!!
Easier said than done.
I do think this is the correct thing even though it is satire.
Bush Mulls Bombing N. Korea ‘Back to the Food Age’
by Scott Ott
(2006-10-10) — Even as President George Bush insisted that the U.S. would continue to pursue diplomacy in the North Korean nuclear crisis, he added today that every option is still on the table, including the possibility of “bombing them back to the food age.”
“It breaks my compassionate conservative heart that Kim Jong-Il’s people are starving while he’s blowing millions of dollars on weapons of mass destruction,” said Mr. Bush. “If it weren’t for U.S. and United Nations food aid, he’d have a massive famine on his hands.”
The president suggested that a carefully executed bombing campaign, or a Special Ops military unit, could return the country to “the food age” — a time when the Korean people could feed themselves without assistance.
“Sometimes,” the president said, “it takes guns to make butter.”
Taking action is
what Muslims do. The West will
arrest and try him . . .
As a point of information when did we ever do this? I know about Castro's exploding cigars but aside from that when have we ever gone around killing off third world leaders? (Or even first world leaders)
Assassination of foreign leaders is at best unreliable policy. One is never certain how much of the difficulty lies with the leader and how much he or she is merely a front man for the real problem. Iran's Ahmadinejad is a perfect example of this. Nor are results always predictable - the South Vietnamese government never really did recover from Diem's assassination.
While it does not surprise me that a freshman at university is under the impression that the U.S. has slaughtered inconvenient Latin American leaders wholesale it isn't actually the case. People have been repeating that Salvador Allende was so assassinated for so long now that serious historians are about the only people to believe otherwise, on campus at least. The trouble taken to capture Manuel Noriega where a simple bullet would have done the job seems to me to indicate quite the reverse. Danny Ortega is still drawing breath, as is Hugo Chavez. The U.S. is much more often (and accurately) accused of supporting, or at least not opposing, a number of two-bit tyrants because they're "our son-of-a-bitch." As usual, the accusers on the left want it both ways.
I don't think it's likely to happen with Kim any more than it did with Muqtada al-Sadr, another fellow whose appearance might, IMHO, be improved by a .45 caliber hole between the eyes. It would be nice if problems were that easily solved, but they usually aren't.
I will bet anyone here, the best hamburger that Burger King sells, that if Kim detonates another nuclear weapon, some Chinese sniper will drill Kim a new anus in the middle of his forehead. Not only will there be a regieme change in North Korea, I predict a sudden termination of the bloodline of Kim...
I realize a lot of people here don't have much faith in the UN, and neither do I, but today's Security Council resolution was a very big deal for the Chinese. North Korea would do themselves very well to quietly back down, because the Chinese are really not in a charitable mood for their little yellow brothers...
According to Francois Rabelais, among the Latin books studied by Pantagruel was one titled "Concerning the things that ought to be passed over in silence". I'd say that the discussion of this subject was surely belonging there, in the footnotes. "Pity that he endures".
The history of assassination is that it is mostly tried by someone close to the person on which the attempt is made. Maybe that's the way to go.
But we should definitely try to knock off Kim Jong "Jabba The Hut" Il.
I'd say hire a Jewish hit squad.