[Dimensio]

Nice and vague, because you know it will not happen.

Actually, it is unjustified. Fester has repeatedly asserted that "the disintegration of particle matter into such a form as to make the universe unintelligible and science impossible" would falsify intelligent design, but he has steadfastly refused to explain why "Intelligent Design" predicts that such an event should never occur. If it cannot be explained why an event should never occur according to an explanation, then that event cannot be considered a falsification criteria, and claiming that it is a falsification criteria is fundamentaly dishonest.

[Fester Chugabrew]

. . . he has steadfastly refused to explain why "Intelligent Design" predicts that such an event should never occur.

On the contrary, I have asserted in the past that it is the essential nature of intelligent design to organize matter in such a way that it performs specific functions, much as you make use of intelligent design to respond to my posts. It is not to difficult to predict that where there is intelligent design, organization of matter would take place. There is nothing religious or inherently unscientific about it. OTOH, it would not be happening if intelligent design had the evidence to falsify it, namely all particle matter disintegrating into chaos.