First Kim Jong-il has a NoDong failure. Now this. Oh the humanity!
To: 1curiousmind
First Kim Jong-il has a NoDong failure. Now this. The good news for him is that his country should be mostly safe when he launches...
2 posted on
10/13/2006 8:16:51 AM PDT by
pgyanke
(We can't share the blessings of peace with those for whom violence is holy imperative. -andy58-in-nh)
To: 1curiousmind
The latest intelligence estimates of Monday's test at a nuclear test site near Kilju, in northeastern North Korea, put the size of the blast at 0.2 kilotons, or the equivalent of 200 tons of TNT. A conventional bomb in the 0.2 kiloton range is a distinct possibility. Perhaps this explosion was not nuclear at all, and was just a bluff.
I can't see any rational reason for North Korea to do this. But rationality has never been their strong suit.
3 posted on
10/13/2006 8:16:53 AM PDT by
gridlock
(The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
To: 1curiousmind
I can hear the brain dead libs now:
"See, he does not have a nuclear weapon. We have nothing to worry about. Let' negotiate".
Such ridiculous logic is why libs are so dangerous. If they were around during Edison's time, they would have cut funding on his tests to develop the light bulb after his 700th failure, or maybe his 800th failure.
I actually heard some lib pundit profess a few days back that: "The blast was really small, maybe a quarter of the yield of Hiroshima. So, we should not over react".
Again, see how dangerous libs are. A quarter of the yield. Okay, that means a bomb like that, exploded in a densely populated area, would only kill maybe 50,000 instead of 200,000.
Liberals: "We will put anyones life at risk in order to regain our power"
4 posted on
10/13/2006 8:18:50 AM PDT by
technomage
(NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
To: 1curiousmind
No (working) nukes.
No (working) ICBMs.
Tell me why this guy frightens us, again?
5 posted on
10/13/2006 8:19:19 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Islam is a pathological disorder masquerading as a religion.)
To: 1curiousmind
Poor ol' Kim... he gots the missile dysfunction AND the fissile dysfunction!
And all that "H-bomb" talk? Impotent rage. < Beavis > Heheheheh Heh Heh < /Beavis >
7 posted on
10/13/2006 8:24:18 AM PDT by
Charles Martel
(Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
To: 1curiousmind
Half sized blast for a half sized jerk...
8 posted on
10/13/2006 8:25:58 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Liberals:- Free speech for me, but not for thee...Frikkin' hypocrites.- FreeperLIConFem)
To: 1curiousmind
TIGERLIKESROSTER posted this yesterday: It seems that Russia may have had a hand in designing a tunnel which is designed in masking the telltale P-wave that announced a nuclear explosion
For more go here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1717327/posts
10 posted on
10/13/2006 8:30:57 AM PDT by
Robe
(Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
To: 1curiousmind
"The detected explosion likely was produced by the conventional high-explosives used to
split the plutonium atoms and produce a nuclear explosion, one official said.
Yup.
To: 1curiousmind
"Onry two-hunna tons?! It supposabe twenny kiroton! Now evabody gonna tink my rittre Kimmy is rearry rittre."
23 posted on
10/13/2006 9:05:26 AM PDT by
Redcloak
(Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
To: 1curiousmind
How about the poor bastar...uh, technicians who have to haul it out of there.
26 posted on
10/13/2006 9:28:01 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: 1curiousmind
So North Korea's initial tests failed, claims unnamed intel sources. Big deal. Yesterday, Kim was threatening to set off a
hydrogen bomb in a new test. That threat was published in European media reports. The U.S. news media sat on their hands. ABC, NBC, SeeBS all ignored the threat so it never happened. Just like China's threats to nuke the west coast never happened. Only what appears on the nightly television news happens. The country falls asleep in front of their television sets every night. Nothing ever happens. Except for the Foley scandals. They are still in the news. Go back to sleep, people.
27 posted on
10/13/2006 9:28:39 AM PDT by
ex-Texan
(Matthew 7: 1 - 6)
To: 1curiousmind
The detected explosion likely was produced by the conventional high-explosives used to split the plutonium atoms and produce a nuclear explosion, one official saidThis official has no clue how a nuclear bomb works.
29 posted on
10/13/2006 9:32:05 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: 1curiousmind
Wouldn't a partial detonation would leave an awful lot radioactive material around?
36 posted on
10/13/2006 12:18:22 PM PDT by
Mike Darancette
(Those that do not heed the warnings of history....)
To: 1curiousmind
Failure or deliberate fake?
To: 1curiousmind
I know how he must feel with that, no dong, "failure".
41 posted on
10/13/2006 12:59:37 PM PDT by
buck61
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson