Steel must be another of those honest, but "hurtful" Republicans.
1 posted on
10/12/2006 6:07:29 PM PDT by
SmithL
To: SmithL
if CAIR condemns him, then he has my support!
2 posted on
10/12/2006 6:21:26 PM PDT by
Zeppelin
(You've been Zarqed !)
To: SmithL
That the left is rallying behind him tells us all we need to know.
3 posted on
10/12/2006 6:24:23 PM PDT by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
The inflammatory headline claims there had been an "attack": I assumed the guy had been physically assaulted. In the body of the story, it becomes clear that he had simply been called to account for his pro-terrorist views.Naturally, local democrats are supporting the guy who supports the terrorists. And the press is distorting the story. In the Orwellian world of the media, it's the terrorist apologist who is the "victim." This is really an important election. If the democrats win, this country is in deep trouble. The democrats'affinity for America's enemies is frightening.
4 posted on
10/12/2006 6:25:23 PM PDT by
Godwin1
To: SmithL
The Muslim candidate should reply that the city council does not set foreign policy, but he'd be happy to debate garbage collection schedules and police staffing levels.....if he were smart, that is.
To: SmithL
Shows how mentally retarded the left is. Under islamic law, they would be the first ones beheaded.
7 posted on
10/12/2006 6:41:28 PM PDT by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: SmithL
"The challenge from former state GOP chairman Shawn Steel came .... "
Just why is he "former" ?
If this guy is a Democrat, that's enough reason to toss him, but playing " Muzzie..Muzzie ! " dosen't cut it ....
8 posted on
10/12/2006 6:44:22 PM PDT by
RS
("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
To: SmithL
Oh how times have changed. Can anyone who was alive during WWII, imagine a Nazi, whether German or American, running for office in the USA (even in California) and being defended by local yokels to the point that they would condemn and demonize his opponent for pointing out the fact he was indeed a Nazi?
I don't think so.
It is a sorry state of affairs today that we have so many absolute d@mn fools who feel compelled to defend unto the death, anyone who even vaguely resembles an enemy of our Republic.
Death should be the punishment for such traitors, but revoking their citizenship and deporting them to the land of the enemies they side with, would be a satisfactory compromise.
10 posted on
10/12/2006 7:00:53 PM PDT by
F.J. Mitchell
( Stock up on Kleenex,you cry baby Dems. The Mother of all @$$ kickings is coming to you,)
To: SmithL
"We call on all Californians to reject attempts to spread fear of Islam and Muslims by falsely labeling Arab-American and Muslim-American candidates as extremists," said Hussam Ayloush, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.
Says a spokeman for a group that supports terroist. What A suprise.
14 posted on
10/12/2006 9:02:36 PM PDT by
Valin
(http://www.irey.com/)
To: SmithL
didn't see the left condemning the students at columbia for physically attacking Jim Gilchrist.
16 posted on
10/12/2006 9:21:21 PM PDT by
sten
To: SmithL
Now it is a hate crime to call a candidate to account for his publicly declared positions and sympathies.
This is censorship by consensus.
The institutional media ("MSM") are no more a "free press" than was Goebbels' propaganda ministry.
22 posted on
10/22/2006 12:19:06 AM PDT by
atomic conspiracy
(Islamo-terrorists: Strike force of the MSM)
To: SmithL
If you want to know Mr. Dalatis politics may I suggest all go to--- noiri.blogspot.com
The answer to many of Americas problems will be explained at this web sight.
Mr. Dalati is part of the coming problem for America.
24 posted on
10/22/2006 8:50:25 AM PDT by
buck61
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson