To: Aetius
"Libertarians preferred George W. Bush over Al Gore by 72 to 20 percent, but Bush's margin dropped in 2004 to 59-38 over John Kerry."
Remind me again...just how are they conserative?
To: CWOJackson
Remind me again...just how are they conserative?We believe in small government and leaving most social issues to the states. It's a much more philospohically honest approach to conservatism than the social conservatism, who's followers want to use big government as a tool of social control almost as much as the libs do.
5 posted on
10/12/2006 4:34:53 PM PDT by
Zeroisanumber
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: CWOJackson
"Libertarians preferred George W. Bush over Al Gore by 72 to 20 percent, but Bush's margin dropped in 2004 to 59-38 over John Kerry."Remind me again...just how are they conserative?
You must realize that a.)President Bush is not conservative, so his numbers are not indicitive of conservative views b.)There are a lot of idiots such as Bill Mahar who clkaim to be libertarian but are anything but and c.)President Reagan called libertarianism the "heart and soul of conservatism".
44 posted on
10/13/2006 10:58:59 AM PDT by
jmc813
(.)(.)
To: CWOJackson
"Libertarians preferred George W. Bush over Al Gore by 72 to 20 percent, but Bush's margin dropped in 2004 to 59-38 over John Kerry."
Remind me again...just how are they conserative?
Exactly. They are not "conservative" in any meaningful sense. Moral and cultural relativists who do not reject their behavioral pathologies, but celebrate them and vote according to them, can never be considered conservatives.
Help keep the GOP conservativeDrop a c-note on Santorum
http://www.ricksantorum.com
47 posted on
10/13/2006 11:05:28 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(Ruin a Democrat's day...help re-elect Rick Santorum.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson