Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daley: By 2016, cameras on 'almost every block'
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | 10--12-06 | FRAN SPIELMAN

Posted on 10/12/2006 8:22:12 AM PDT by dogbyte12

Security and terrorism won't be an issue if Chicago wins the right to host the 2016 Summer Olympic Games because, by that time, there'll be a surveillance camera on every corner, Mayor Daley said Wednesday. "By the time 2016 [rolls around], we'll have more cameras than Washington, D.C. ... Our technology is more advanced than any other city in the world -- even compared to London -- dealing with our cameras and the sophistication of cameras and retro-fitting all the cameras downtown in new buildings, doing the CTA cameras," Daley said.

"By 2016, I'll make you a bet. We'll have [cameras on] almost every block."

(Excerpt) Read more at suntimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: fascist; govwatch; iforonefeelsafernow; libertarians; mayordaley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: dogbyte12

Where are all the civil liberties complainers?

Oh, nevermind, it isn't a Bush proposal.


21 posted on 10/12/2006 8:58:12 AM PDT by Crooked Constituent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

Remember Meigs Field.............


22 posted on 10/12/2006 8:59:12 AM PDT by lmailbvmbipfwedu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

Humans will evolve in response to a changing enviroment. Those who cannot adopt will die out and a new, improved human will emerge.
-Joe Stalin


23 posted on 10/12/2006 8:59:48 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
Can we be private anywhere now?

I'm no fan of the idea of a camera on every street corner, but the honest truth is that there is no right to privacy when you're in public, and there never has been.

24 posted on 10/12/2006 9:00:31 AM PDT by jpl (Victorious warriors win first, then go to war; defeated warriors go to war first, then seek to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican

I feel safer already.


25 posted on 10/12/2006 9:01:43 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

More guns (in citizen hands), fewer cameras.


26 posted on 10/12/2006 9:03:41 AM PDT by white trash redneck (Everything I needed to know about Islam I learned on 9-11-01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

"Blackmail though."

We are already reaping some of the "rewards" of this kind of intrusion into our lives. Why do you think there are so few quality candidates for public office? Most people have something in their past that would be a problem, or just to painful to deal with in a campaign. The result is we get candidates who are "electable", not qualified.

What the heck, put cameras everywhere. I'm getting too old to care, or fight.


27 posted on 10/12/2006 9:07:20 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

how about cameras on the people counting the votes, and the mayor's office?


28 posted on 10/12/2006 9:09:04 AM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
These cameras will work about as well as the signs posted outside of schools that say NO WEAPONS OR DRUGS ALLOWED ON PROPERTY!

Yep, that keeps the bad guys away.

29 posted on 10/12/2006 9:09:45 AM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I don't think it makes ME feel safer but I do like the thought of the govts ability to track a perpetrator. I would not want the govt having cameras in my home, but in public, no problem. All these people wondering about who will watch these cameras do not understand they go to tape and are used after the fact to review.
30 posted on 10/12/2006 9:11:19 AM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

Liberals live and act as if they watched _The Prisoner_ during the '60s and thought to themselves, hey, yea, that Village, that's the way to make things!

Be seeing you, indeed.


31 posted on 10/12/2006 9:12:55 AM PDT by No.6 (www.fourthfightergroup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

What's the problem?
If you aren't doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear from all the cameras...

/THICK SARC


32 posted on 10/12/2006 9:14:32 AM PDT by bamahead (It is better to correct your own faults than those of another. - Democritus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican

A patrolman on every corner is the best way to protect the streets. With National Guard backup. If it gets hairier than that go to martial law and replace the patrolman with a soldier with a long gun.


33 posted on 10/12/2006 9:15:57 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32; traviskicks

ping


34 posted on 10/12/2006 9:15:59 AM PDT by bamahead (It is better to correct your own faults than those of another. - Democritus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
It ain't just Daley - all the pols seem to love the government cameras. Better to keep an eye on the little people (and political enemies), I suppose.

I say ban them.

35 posted on 10/12/2006 9:17:05 AM PDT by meyer (A vote for amnesty is a vote against America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crooked Constituent

Good point. From a dem organization, this is just accepted. Wonder what kind of howling we would hear if the Republicans pushed this big brother crap.


36 posted on 10/12/2006 9:19:23 AM PDT by abovethefray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican
Who will be watching the cameras? - probably no one, but if an assault occurs they can then go back, see the event, and back track the perp. I like the idea.

We have a few in Chattanooga. I get to watch a couple of them. It's fun watching the drunks leave the corner pub at 2 AM.

37 posted on 10/12/2006 9:19:47 AM PDT by meyer (A vote for amnesty is a vote against America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I think a patrolman on every corner 24/7 is much more expensive. Martial law? now I think you are joking - I hope.


38 posted on 10/12/2006 9:20:13 AM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12

Congratulations, Mr. Orwell. You were only 32 years off.


39 posted on 10/12/2006 9:21:42 AM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Sometimes those who scream loudest for "justice" are the ones that want real justice the least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
Yikes! Big brother is watching, or wants to be. Creepy. I'd love to go to the Olympics, even in Chicago, but this will change things for me.

And Daley has done so well with crime thus far, just look at how the gun control has stymied crime. (end sarcasm, begin laughing)

40 posted on 10/12/2006 9:23:09 AM PDT by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson