1 posted on
10/11/2006 10:38:38 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem; bitt; Joe Brower; Eaker; blackie; Aeronaut; Pukin Dog; doug from upland; apackof2; ...
2 posted on
10/11/2006 10:53:05 PM PDT by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: neverdem
When they allow business to ban the legally carried arms on their property the next problem you get is some will tell their employees that they can even have a gun in their car in the parking lot.
That makes the employee unarmed going to and from work if they want to keep their job. That is exactly when you are most likely to need it for self defense.
3 posted on
10/11/2006 10:56:24 PM PDT by
Beagle8U
(Demonrats want the Gays out of Congress.....stand back and let them purge their base.)
To: neverdem
Once again, it looks like ev'rythin's up-to-date in Kansas City.
I think the signs are a supercool idea; they'll help all the CW permit holders figure out right away which businesses not to patronize.
I don't know who's more stupid, the bureaucrats who came up with the idea of the signs or the businesses that will actually use them.
5 posted on
10/11/2006 11:44:39 PM PDT by
HKMk23
(PRO-LIFE: Because a Person's a Person, no matter how small.)
To: neverdem
They could use these...
6 posted on
10/12/2006 1:17:28 AM PDT by
Redcloak
(Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
To: neverdem
Look to SC for guidance on gun prohibition signs. Without a tight statute the gun-grabbers will entrap and lie. E.g., a venue without 'doors' requires as four feet by three feet gun prohibition sign.
9 posted on
10/12/2006 3:49:56 AM PDT by
dhuffman@awod.com
(The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
To: neverdem
Shades of Minnesota
10 posted on
10/12/2006 3:59:30 AM PDT by
tiger-one
(The night has a thousand eyes)
To: neverdem
The businesses with these signs will be entered by criminals carrying guns and planning to use them for hold ups.
Criminals carrying guns will avoid businesses where there are no signs.
To: neverdem
The
"Texas Section 30.06" sign seems to work well. Why do Kansas congresscritters think they need to "re-invent the wheel"...?
PROHIBITING HANDGUNS IN A BUSINESS OR OTHER ENTITY
In order to provide notice that entry on property by a license holder with a concealed handgun is forbidden, Penal Code Section 30.06(c)(3)(A) requires that a written communication contain the following language:
"PURSUANT TO SECTION 30.06, PENAL CODE (TRESPASS BY HOLDER OF A LICENSE TO CARRY A CONCEALED HANDGUN) A PERSON LICENSED UNDER SUBCHAPTER H, CHAPTER 411, GOVERNMENT CODE (CONCEALED HANDGUN LAW), MAY NOT ENTER THIS PROPERTY WITH A CONCEALED HANDGUN." "CONFORME A LA SECCIÓN 30.06 DEL CÔDIGO PENAL (TRASPASAR PORTANDO ARMAS DE FUEGO) PERSONAS CON LICENCIA BAJO DEL SUB-CAPITULO H, CAPITULO 411, CODIGO DE GOBIERNO (LEY DE PORTAR ARMAS), NO DEBEN ENTRAR A ESTA PROPIEDAD PORTANDO UN ARMA DE FUEGO." |
Penal Code Section 30.06(c)(3)(B) further states that a sign must meet the following requirements:
- includes the language described by Paragraph (A) in both English and Spanish;
- appears in contrasting colors with block letters at least one inch in height; and
- is displayed in a conspicuous manner clearly visible to the public.
The size (due to the 1" letter height) makes it big and unattractive. ;-)
The only places I've ever seen them is on hospitals and banks...
15 posted on
10/12/2006 6:50:56 AM PDT by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson